0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Active Versus Passive Vibration Absorbers

[+] Author and Article Information
R. Herzog

International Center for Magnetic Bearings, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 116(3), 367-371 (Sep 01, 1994) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2899231 History: Received March 26, 1992; Online March 17, 2008

Abstract

Passivity based control has several advantages, e.g., robustness and simplicity. However, the passivity constraint causes performance degradations. Specifically, the degree to which passively controlled absorber systems yield a flat response around the nominal absorber frequency is limited. An inherent flatness bound is derived using Nevanlinna-Pick boundary interpolation theory. For active vibration absorbers, this limitation cancels, and magnitude response can be made arbitrarily flat.

Copyright © 1994 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In