Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of an Opto-Pneumatic Detector

[+] Author and Article Information
G. Belforte, V. Viktorov, G. Eula, A. Ivanov

Department of Mechanics, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 10129 Torino, Italy

T. Raparelli

Department of Energetics, Università di L’Aquila, 67040 Roio Poggio, L’ Aquila, Italy

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 122(1), 168-173 (Jun 25, 1996) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.482438 History: Received June 25, 1996
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Gurney,  J. O., 1984, “Photofluidic Interface,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 106, pp. 90–97.
Hockaday,  B. D., and Waters,  J. P., 1990, “Direct Optical-to-Mechanical Actuation,” Appl. Opt., 29, No. 31. pp. 4629–4632.
Hu, F. Q., Watson, J. M., Page, M., and Payne, P. A., 1990, “A High Speed Optopneumatic Digital Actuator,” Appl. Optics Optoelectron., Sept., pp. 97–98.
Bramley, H. C., Hu, F. Q., and Walton, J. M., 1993, “Optical Control of a Pneumatic Actuator,” EURO+PEAN. J. Fluid Power, March, pp. 16–19.
Nakada T., Morikawa M., and Cao Dong-Hiu, 1994, “Study on Opto-Pneumatic Control System,” 11th Aachener International Colloquium, pp. 255–260.
Drzewiecki, M., Tada, K., and Gurney, J., 1985, “Photofluidic Interface,” USA Patent N.4.512.371.
Viktorov, V. V., 1990, “An Optofluidic Converter,” Transaction of the All-Union Conference Pneumohydroautomatic and Hydraulic Power, Suzdal, USSR (Russian).
Yamamoto,  K., 1991, “Characteristic of an Optofluidic Converter Utilizing Photoacoustic Effect,” Trans. Soc. Instrum. Control Engineers, 27, No. 12, pp. 1406–1411.
Eula, G., Viktorov, V., and Ivanov, A., 1996, “Valutazione della conduttanza in una cella fotoacustica,” Oleodinamica-Pneumatica, Tecniche Nuove editor, No. 12, pp. 82–88.
Kutatekadze, S. S., and Borishanskii, V. M., 1966, A Concise Encyclopedia of Heat Transfer, Pergamon Press, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of an OPD
Grahic Jump Location
Geometrical configuration of an OPD with a grid system
Grahic Jump Location
Scheme of the experimental prototype
Grahic Jump Location
Pressure signal versus time for G=0,Vad=30 mm3,F=5 Hz; (a) La=150 μm;V=105 mm3; (b) La=150 μm;V=350 mm3; (c) La=150 μm;V=665 mm3; (d) La=45 μm;V=675 mm3; — experimental data; - - theoretical data
Grahic Jump Location
Pressure signal versus time for G=0.5*10−9 m3/s Pa,Vad=70 mm3: (a) La=150 μm;V=105 mm3;F=5 Hz; (b) La=150 μm;V=200 mm3;F=5 Hz; (c) La=150 μm;V=350 mm3;F=10 Hz; (d) La=150 μm;V=665 mm3;F=10 Hz; — experimental data; - - theoretical data
Grahic Jump Location
Pressure signal versus time for G=0.5*10−9m3/s Pa,Vad=70 mm3,F=5 Hz: (a) La=225 μm;V=100 mm3; (b) La=100 μm;V=110 mm3; (c) La=45 μm;V=115 mm3; — experimental data; - - theoretical data
Grahic Jump Location
Pressure signal versus time for G=0.5*10−9 m3/s Pa,Vad=70 mm3,La=150 μm;V=105 mm3: (a) F=10 Hz; (b) F=50 Hz; (c) F=100 Hz; (d) F=200 Hz; — experimental data; - - theoretical data



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In