Experimental Robot Identification: Advantages of Combining Internal and External Measurements and of Using Periodic Excitation

[+] Author and Article Information
Walter Verdonck, Jan Swevers

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium

Jean-Claude Samin

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 123(4), 630-636 (Feb 17, 2001) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1409936 History: Received February 17, 2001
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Swevers,  J., Ganseman,  C., De Schutter,  J., and Van Brussel,  H., 1996, “Experimental robot identification using optimized periodic trajectories,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 10, No. 5, pp. 561–577.
Swevers,  J., Ganseman,  C., Bilgin,  D., De Schutter,  J., and Van Brussel,  H., 1997, “Optimal robot excitation and identification,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 13, No. 5, pp. 730–740.
Hirzinger,  G., Fischer,  M., Brunner,  B., Koeppe,  R., Otter,  M., Grebenstein,  M., and Schäfer,  I., 1999, “Advances in Robotics: The DLR Experience,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 18, No. 11, pp. 1064–1087.
Chenut,  X., Samin,  J. C., Swevers,  J., and Ganseman,  C., 2000, “Combining internal and external robot models for improved model parameter estimation,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 14, No. 5, pp. 691–704.
Gautier, M., 1986, “Identification of robot dynamics,” Proc. IFAC Symposium on Theory of Robots, Vienna, pp. 351–356.
Raucent, B., and Samin, J. C., 1993, “Modelling and identification of dynamic parameters of robot manipulators,” Robot Calibration, R. Bernhardt and S. Albright, eds., Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 197–232.
Liu, G., Iagnemma, K., Dubowsky, S., and Morel, G., 1998, “A base force/torque sensor approach to robot manipulator inertial parameter estimation,” Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, pp. 3316–3321.
Maes,  P., Samin,  J. C., and Willems,  P. Y., 1989, “Linearity of multibody systems with respect to barycentric parameters: dynamic and identification models obtained by symbolic generation,” Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 17, No. 2, pp. 219–237.
Fisette,  P., Raucent,  B., and Samin,  J. C., 1996, “Minimal dynamic characterization of tree-like multibody systems,” Nonlinear Dyn., 9, pp. 165–184.
Armstrong,  B., 1989, “On finding excitation trajectories for identification experiments involving systems with nonlinear dynamics,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 8, No. 6, pp. 28–48.
Gautier,  M., and Khalil,  W., 1992, “Exciting trajectories for the identification of base inertial parameters of robots,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 10, pp. 362–375.
Ljung, L., 1987, System identification, theory for the user, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Wittenburg, J., 1977, Dynamics of Systems or Rigid Bodies, Teubner, Stuttgart.
Ganseman, C., 1998, “Dynamic modeling and identification of mechanisms with application to industrial robots,” Ph.D. thesis, KULeuven, Leuven.
Van De Poel, P., Witvrouw, W., Bruyninckx, H., and De Schutter, J., 1993, “An environment for developing and optimizing compliant robot motion tasks,” 6th Int. IEEE Conference on Advanced Robotics, Atlanta, pp. 112–126.
Schoukens, J., and Pintelon, R., 1991, Identification of linear systems: a practical guideline to accurate modeling, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Swevers, J., Pieters, S., Naumer, B., Biber, E., and Verdonck, W., 2001, “Experimental robot load identification,” submitted to IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
Corke,  P. I., 1996, “In situ Measurement of Robot Motor Electrical Constants,” Robotica, 14, No. 4, pp. 433–436.
Olsen,  M. M., and Petersen,  H. G., 2001, “A new method for estimating parameters of a dynamic robot model,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 17, No. 1, pp. 95–100.


Grahic Jump Location
Schematic representation of a KUKA IR 361 robot
Grahic Jump Location
Optimized robot excitation trajectory: axis 1 (full line), axis 2 (dashed line) and axis 3 (dash-dotted line)
Grahic Jump Location
Joint angular position for the validation trajectory: axis 1 (full line), axis 2 (dashed line) and axis 3 (dash-dotted line)
Grahic Jump Location
Measured motor torque, predicted torque and the corresponding torque prediction errors for the validation trajectory using the combined model
Grahic Jump Location
Measured and predicted reaction forces and torques and the corresponding prediction errors for the validation trajectory using the combined model
Grahic Jump Location
Accelerations obtained by analytical and numerical differentiation (using Tustin’s bilinear differentiation rule) of joint angle measurements: axis 1 (full line), axis 2 (dashed line) and axis 3 (dash-dotted line)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In