0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Design and Control of Optimal Scan Trajectories: Scanning Tunneling Microscope Example

[+] Author and Article Information
Hector Perez, Qingze Zou, Santosh Devasia

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Box 352600, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 126(1), 187-197 (Apr 12, 2004) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1636770 History: Received March 12, 2002; Revised May 12, 2003; Online April 12, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Barrett,  R., and Quate,  C., 1991, Optical scan-correction system applied to atomic force microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 62(6), 1393–1399.
Cai,  C., Chen,  X., Shu,  Q., and Zheng,  X., Dec., 1993, Computer correction for distorted stm images. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 63(12), 5649–5652.
Cloet, C., Tomizuka, M., and Horowitz, R., July 2001, Design requirements and reference trajectory generation for a copier paper-path. IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics Proceedings, pages 911–916. Como, Italy.
Croft,  D., and Devasia,  S., December 1999, Vibration compensation for high speed scanning tunneling microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 70(12), 4600–4605.
Curtis,  R., Mitsui,  T., and Ganz,  E., 1997, An ultrahigh vacuum high speed scanning tunneling microscope. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 68, 2790–2796.
Daniele, A., Salapaka, S., Salapaka, M., and Dahleh, M., June 1999, Piezoelectric scanners for atomic force microscopes: Design of lateral sensors, indentification and control. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pages 253–257, San Diego, CA.
Devasia,  S., Nov. 2002, Should model-based inverse input be used as feedforward under plant uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 47(11), 1865–1871.
Devasia,  S., Chen,  D., and Paden,  B., 1996, Nonlinear inversion-based output tracking. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 41(7), 930–942.
Dewey,  J. S., Leang,  K., and Devasia,  S., 1998, Experimental and theoretical results in output-trajectory redesign for flexible structures. ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 120, 456–461.
Dowd,  A. V., and Thanos,  M. D., October 2000, Vector motion processing using spectral windows. IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 20(5), 8–19.
Fung,  R.-F., Huang,  J. S., Chien,  C. G., and Wang,  Y. C., 2000, Design and application of a continuous repetitive controller for rotating mechanisms. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 42, 1805–1819.
Ghosh,  J., and Paden,  B., May 2000, Nonlinear repetitive control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 45(5), 949–954.
Gupta,  N. K., Nov 1980, Frequency-shaped cost functionals: Extension of linear-quadratic-gaussian design methods. J. Guid. Control, 3(6), 529–535.
J., G. H. and (Editors), W. R., 1994, Scanning Tunneling Microscopy I. Surface Sciences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2nd edition.
Lewis, F. L., and Syrmos, V. L., 1995, Optimal Control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158–0012.
Moore,  K. L., and Xu,  J.-X. E., 2000, Special issue on iterative learning control. Int. J. Control, 73(10), 57.
Ortega, J. M., 1987, Matrix Theory. The university series in mathematics. 1987 Plenum Press, New York., 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013.
Piazzi,  A., and Visioli,  A., March 2000, Minimum-time system-inversion-based motion planning for residual vibration reduction. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 5(1), 12–22.
Pitas, I., 2000, Digital Image Processing Algorithms and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sain,  M. K., and Massey,  J. L., 1969, Invertibility of linear time-invariant dynamical systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 14, 141–149.
Sastry, S., 1999, Nonlinear Systems. Analysis, Stability and Control, volume 10 of Interdisciplinary applied mathematics. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010.
Silverman,  L. M., 1969, Inversion of multivariable linear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 14(3), 270–276.
Urey, H., Wine, D., and Lewis, J. R., January 1999, Scanner design and resolution tradeoffs for miniature scanning displays. Conference on Flat Panel Display Technology (Proc. of SPIE), 3636 , 60–68. San Jose, CA.
Vandervoort,  K. G., Zasadzinski,  R. K., Galicia,  G. G., and Crabtree,  G. W., Apr., 1993, Full temperature calibration from 4 to 300 k of the voltage response of piezoelectric tube scanner pzt-5a for use in scanning tunneling microscopes. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 64(4), 896–899.
Vig,  J. R., and Kim,  Y., Jul/Aug 1999, Noise in microelectromechanical system resonators. IEEE Trans. on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectronics, and Frequency Control, 46(6), 1558–1565.
Whitesides,  G. M., and Love,  H. C., 2001, The art of building small. Sci. Am., 285(3), 39–47.
Wiesendanger, R., editor, 1994, Scanning Probe Microscopy and Spectroscopy. Cambridge University Press.
Wilder,  K., Soh,  H. T., Atalar,  A., and Quate,  C. F., 1999, Nanometer-scale patterning and individual current controlled lithography using multiple scanning probes. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 70, 2822–2827.
Zou,  Q., and Devasia,  S., December 1999, Preview-based stable-inversion for output tracking of linear systems. ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 121 625–630.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Scan trajectory consisting two parts: Tracking (active-scan) section (t0<t<ti); and the transition (retrace) section (ti≤t≤tf). The desired output trajectory is pre-specified in the active-scan section; it is not pre-specified during the retrace section.
Grahic Jump Location
STM scanner scheme (plot (a)) and scan trajectory (plot (b)); figures are not to scale.
Grahic Jump Location
System consisting of Prefilter and STM scanner.
Grahic Jump Location
Inputs obtained in simulation for Case I with Ttran=Ttrack=5 ms (left column) and case II (right column) with Ttrack=5 ms,Ttran=2 ms, using three approaches: (i) the polynomial trajectory with the DC-gain approach (plot (a1) and (a2)), (ii) the polynomial trajectory with the inversion-based approach (plot (b1) and (b2)), (iii) the optimal scan-trajectory approach (plot (c1) and (c2)), where u (solid line) is the input before the pre-filter, and u⁁ (dashed line) is the input after pre-filter (see Figure 3).
Grahic Jump Location
Simulation results of the output tracking using DC-gain approach for Case I with Ttran=Ttrack=5 ms (plot (a)) and case II with Ttrack=5 ms,Ttran=2 ms (plot (b)).
Grahic Jump Location
Experimental results, images of graphite surface: For Case I (K=1, left column), and case II (K=0.4, right column), the images were acquired using inputs found from the three approaches: (i) the polynomial trajectory with the DC-gain approach (plots (a1) and (a2)); (ii) the polynomial trajectory with the inversion-based approach (plots (b1) and (b2)); and (iii) the optimal scan-trajectory approach (plots (c1) and (c2)).
Grahic Jump Location
Experimental STM image of graphite acquired using polynomial trajectory with inversion-based approach for K=1 (plot (a)), and the plot of the connected atom centers (plot (b)) for the image shown on the left. In plot (b), the atom-spacing where the maximum error occurred (δmax) is indicated as the thick line between two atoms.
Grahic Jump Location
Simulation results: optimal scanning cost Jtran* for different K: Transition Time/Tracking Time, where Tracking time is fixed to be 5 ms.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In