0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Performance Limitation and Autotuning of Inverse Optimal PID Controller for Lagrangian Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Youngjin Choi

Intelligent Robotics Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Hawolgok-Dong, Sungbuk-Gu, Seoul, 136-791, Republic of Korea, Phone: 82-2-958-5756; Fax: 82-2-958-5749cyj@kist.re.kr

Wan Kyun Chung

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), San 31, Hyoja-Dong, Nam-Ku, Pohang, 790-784, Republic of Korea, Phone: 82-54-279-2172; Fax: 82-54-279-5899wkchung@postech.edu

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 127(2), 240-249 (Oct 25, 2004) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1898236 History: Received October 10, 2002; Revised October 25, 2004

The PID trajectory tracking controller for Lagrangian systems shows performance limitation imposed by inverse dynamics according to desired trajectory. Since the equilibrium point cannot be defined for the control system involving performance limitation, we define newly the quasiequilibrium region as an alternative for equilibrium point. This analysis result of performance limitation can guide us the autotuning method for PID controller. The quasiequilibrium region is used as the target performance of autotuning PID trajectory tracking controller. The autotuning law is derived from the direct adaptive control scheme, based on the extended disturbance input-to-state stability and the characteristics of performance limitation. Finally, experimental results show that the target performance can be achieved by the proposed automatic tuning method.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Simple pendulum system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Desired trajectory for pendulum system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Simulation results for pendulum system when k=10

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Quasiequilibrium region

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Target performance and nontuning region

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

3-DOF Robotic Manipulator

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Performance of autotuning PID controller

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Composite error and autotuned gains

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In