0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Nanoscale Motion Control With a Compact Minimum-Actuator Magnetic Levitator

[+] Author and Article Information
Jie Gu, Shobhit Verma

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3123

Won-jong Kim1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3123wjkim@mengr.tamu.edu

1

Corresponding author, Member of ASME

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 127(3), 433-442 (Aug 24, 2004) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1978906 History: Received May 23, 2003; Revised August 24, 2004

This paper presents a novel magnetically levitated (maglev) stage developed to meet the ever-increasing precise positioning requirements in nanotechnology. This magnetic levitator has 6 independent linear actuators necessary and sufficient to generate all 6-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) motions. This minimum-actuator design concept led to a compact, 200 g lightweight moving part and the power consumption less than of a Watt, thereby reducing the thermal-expansion error drastically. The analysis and sizing of the magnetic linear actuators and the working principle of the maglev stage are presented. We designed and implemented stabilizing controllers for 6-DOF motion control with the dynamic model based on the actuator analysis. Test results showed nanoscale step responses in all six axes with 2nmrms horizontal position noise. A noise propagation model and analysis identified the capacitance sensor noise and the floor vibration as the dominant noise sources in the vertical and horizontal dynamics, respectively. A comparison of noise performances with controllers closed at 25, 65, and 90 Hz crossover frequencies illustrated how the selection of the control bandwidth should be made for nanopositioning. Experimental results including a 250μm step response, sinusoidal and square-wave trajectories, and spherical motion generation demonstrated the three-dimensional (3D) nanoscale motion-control capability of this minimum-actuator magnetic levitator. Potential applications of this maglev stage include manufacture of nanoscale structures, atomic-level manipulation, assembly and packaging of microparts, vibration isolation for delicate instruments, and seismic motion detection.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Photograph of the maglev stage. The triangular shape in the center is the maglev single-moving platen

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Exploded view of the mechanical setup

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Noise contributions from various sources (a) in the horizontal modes, and (b) In the vertical modes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Extended-range 250μm step response in x and disturbed motions in all the other axes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

(a) 20nm amplitude square-wave motion in x. (b) 50nm amplitude sinusoidal motion in x. The dashed lines represent the commanded input to generate the motion.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

3D spherical motion. The hemispherical shell has a radius of 50μm, and each circular motion is separated by 0.5μm in the vertical direction.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic diagram of a linear magnetic actuator. A Lorentz force is generated by placing the current-carrying coil in the magnetic field produced by the magnet assembly. The optimal thickness of 3.84mm of the aluminum nonmagnetic spacer is exaggerated here for clarity.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

(a) Definition of the axes and the numbering convention for each actuator. (b) Definition of the geometric parameters in the modal force and displacement transformations. (c) Conceptual actuator force allocation for 6-axis modal force generation.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Plot of payload vs current required to maintain the position

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Control loop of the maglev system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Convariances of the theoretical sensor noise and disturbance, and an empirical result with respect to the crossover frequency in the horizontal modes. To find the total theoretical noise convarience, the two components (disturbance and sensor noise) should be added. Note that the magnitude is in a logarithmic scale.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

1μm step responses in x with crossover frequencies at (a) 25Hz, (b) 65Hz, and (c) 90Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

1μm step responses in X by a MATLAB simulation and an experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Step responses in all six axes with step sizes of (a) 20nm in x, (b) 20nm in y, (c) 0.2μm in z, (d) 10μrad in ψ, (e) 10μrad in θ, and (f) 1μrad in ϕ

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In