0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Nondiagonal QFT Controller Design for a Three-Input Three-Output Industrial Furnace

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Garcia-Sanz

Automatic Control and Computer Science Department, Campus Arrosadia, Public University of Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spainmgsanz@unavarra.es

M. Barreras

Automatic Control and Computer Science Department, Campus Arrosadia, Public University of Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 128(2), 319-329 (Jul 29, 2005) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2194068 History: Received February 08, 2005; Revised July 29, 2005

This paper addresses the temperature control of a three-input (power supplies) three-output (temperature sensors) industrial furnace used to manufacture large composite pieces. Due to the multivariable condition of the process, the strong interaction between the three control loops and the presence of model uncertainties, a sequential design methodology based on quantitative feedback theory is proposed to design the controllers. The methodology derives a full matrix compensator that improves reliability, stability, and control. It not only copes with furnace model uncertainties but also enhances the reference tracking and the homogeneousness of the composite piece temperature while minimizing the coupling effects among the furnace zones and the operating costs.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Industrial furnace and piece to be manufactured inside. (Courtesy of MTorres and Siflexa, Spain).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Control structure of the furnace. Two degree of freedom MIMO system.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Tracking specifications. (a) Time domain. (b) Frequency domain.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

(a) Element λ11, (b) element λ12, (c) element λ21, and (d) element λ22 of the RGA matrix. λ13, λ23, λ33, λ31, λ32 can be calculated applying Σλij=1, ∀i or ∀j.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Loop shaping step B1: L0(s)=[p11*e(s)]−1g11(s)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Frequency plot of the obtained coupling reduction due to (a) g21(s), (b) g12(s), (c) g32(s),

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Loop shaping step B2: L0(s)=[p22*e(s)]−1g22(s)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Loop shaping step B3: L0(s)=[p33*e(s)]−1g33(s)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Response of the 3×3 MIMO industrial furnace, following a reference cure cycle and rejecting a disturbance at plant output in the first channel at t=41,400sec. (a), (b) T1 and OP1. (c), (d) T2 and OP2. (e), (f) T3 and OP3.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Structure of a two degree of freedom MIMO system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Sequential steps for controller design

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In