Unidrive Modular Robot: Dynamics, Control, and Experiments

[+] Author and Article Information
Hamidreza Karbasi, Amir Khajepour, Jan Paul Huissoon

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada

In a SWC as the torsional spring wraps down, the output torque increases linearly in a short period of time and the output velocity becomes equal to the input velocity rapidly. To model this, it is assumed that a virtual viscous friction is acting between the input and output shafts (for details see Ref. 6).

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 128(4), 969-975 (Nov 15, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2363199 History: Received October 18, 2004; Revised November 15, 2005

In this paper, a control design methodology for the new class of modular robots so-called “unidrive modular robots” is introduced. Unidrive modular robots because of employing only a single drive for operating all the joints have a substantial advantage over regular modular robots in terms of the mass of each module. The drive is mounted at the robot base and all joints tap power from the single drive using clutches. By controlling the engagement time of the clutches, the position and velocity of the joints are regulated. In this work, a general state space model of the robot is first developed and then based on the theory of variable structure systems and sliding mode control a design methodology for local controllers is introduced. The control design technique is validated by experimental results.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Series configuration of the unidrive modular robot

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Parallel configuration of the unidrive modular robot

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic of the unidrive modular robot control system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Schematic of the mechanical drive

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Proposed lumped model for SWCs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Steady state error reduction in the controlled response due to gain increasing

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Effects of different gains on 20Hz PWM: (a) gain=0.05, (b) gain=0.1, (c) gain=0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Chattering reduced by increasing PWM frequency

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

PWM signals with different frequencies: (a) 5Hz, (b) 20Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Unidrive gantry robot

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Average model of ON-OFF-ON PWM controlled system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Nonlinear PWM controlled system




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In