0
TECHNICAL BRIEFS

Adaptive Servoregulation of a Projectile Fin Using Piezoelectric Actuator

[+] Author and Article Information
Smitha Mani

Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering,  University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4026

Sahjendra N. Singh

Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering,  University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4026sahaj@ee.unlv.edu

Surya Kiran Parimi, Woosoon Yim

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4026

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 129(1), 100-104 (Mar 07, 2006) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2397159 History: Received June 08, 2005; Revised March 07, 2006

This brief paper treats the question of adaptive control of a projectile fin using a piezoelectric actuator. The hollow projectile fin is rigid, within which a flexible cantilever beam with a piezoelectric active layer is mounted. The model of the fin-beam system includes the aerodynamic moment, which is a function of angle of attack of the projectile. The rotation angle of the fin is controlled by deforming the flexible beam, which is hinged at the tip of the rigid fin. An adaptive servoregulator is designed for the control of the fin angle using the fin angle and its derivative for feedback. Interestingly, the knowledge of the dimension and parameters of the system is not essenstial for the synthesis of the control law. In the closed-loop system, the fin angle asymptotically converges to the desired set point and the elastic modes converge to their equilibrium values. Computer simulation and laboratory test results are presented to show the performance of the controller.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Configuration of smart fin

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Adaptive control: θ=3deg, α=5deg. (a) Fin angle, θ (deg). (b) Deflections w6, w5, w4 (m). (c) Deflections w3, w2 (m). (d) Control input (Volts). (e) Tracking error (deg). (f) Estimated parameter.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Experimental results (a) Control input (Volts). (b) Fin angle, θ (deg). (c) Estimated parameter.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In