0
Technical Briefs

Closed-Loop Dynamic Analysis of a Rotary Inverted Pendulum for Control Design

[+] Author and Article Information
Hashem Ashrafiuon1

Director, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics and Control Professor e-mail: hashem.ashrafiuon@villanova.edu Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085

Alan M. Whitman

Director, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics and Control Professor e-mail: hashem.ashrafiuon@villanova.edu Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085

1

Corresponding author.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 134(2), 024503 (Dec 30, 2011) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005358 History: Received February 02, 2011; Revised September 26, 2011; Published December 30, 2011; Online December 30, 2011

This paper presents an approximate analytical solution for the weakly nonlinear closed-loop dynamics of the sliding phase of a sliding mode controlled rotary inverted pendulum based on the multiple scale method. A locally stable nonlinear sliding mode control law with starting configurations above the horizontal line is presented for the rotary inverted pendulum. The analytical expressions derived from the nonlinear solution of the reduced-order closed-loop dynamics provide both qualitative and quantitative insight into the closed-loop response leading to proper selection of parameters that guarantee stabilization and improve controller performance. The approximate analytical solution is verified through comparison with the exact numerical solution. The control performance predicted by the analytical solution is experimentally demo.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

The rotary inverted pendulum

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Comparison of simulation and experimental results; (top) pendulum rod angle, (middle) rotating arm angle, (bottom) control input voltage

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Comparison of approximate and exact solutions for small δ  = 0.01; (top) u corresponding to φ , (bottom) x corresponding to θ

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Comparison of approximate and exact solutions for large δ  = 0.1; (top) u corresponding to φ , (bottom) x corresponding to θ

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Sensitivity of the closed-loop response to ɛ ; (top) u corresponding to φ , (bottom) x corresponding to θ

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Sensitivity of the closed-loop response to Δ; (top) u corresponding to φ , (bottom) x corresponding to θ

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Experimental control with varying ɛ values; (top) u corresponding to φ , (middle) x corresponding toθ , (bottom) input voltage v

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Experimental control with varying Δ values; (top) u corresponding to φ , (middle) x corresponding to θ , (bottom) input voltage v

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In