0
Research Articles

Pelton Turbine Needle Control Model Development, Validation, and Governor Designs

[+] Author and Article Information
Randell M. Johnson

Lead Engineer
Transmission Planning and Strategy,
Northeast Utilities,
Hartford, CT 06141

Joe H. Chow

Professor
Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,
Troy, NY 12180

MATLAB and SIMULINK are trademarks of The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.

Manager Hydro Projects,
Anchorage Municipal Light & Power,
Anchorage, AK 99501

1The research was performed when R. Johnson was a Ph.D. student at RPI, prior to his current affiliation with Northeast Utilities.

2Corresponding author.

3Retired.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control. Manuscript received July 28, 2008; final manuscript received September 17, 2012; published online December 19, 2012. Editor: J. Karl Hedrick.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 135(1), 011015 (Dec 19, 2012) (10 pages) Paper No: DS-08-1227; doi: 10.1115/1.4007972 History: Received July 28, 2008; Revised September 17, 2012

Underspeed needle control of two Pelton turbine hydro units operating in a small power system has caused many incidents of partial system blackouts. Among the causes are conservative governor designs with regard to small signal stability limits, nonminimum phase power characteristics, and long tunnel-penstock traveling wave effects. A needle control model is developed from “water to wires” and validated for hydro-turbine dynamics using turbine test data. Model parameters are tuned using a trajectory sensitivity method. In the governor design proposed here the needle regulation gains are distributed into the power and frequency governor loops with a multi-timescale approach. Elements of speed loop gain scheduling and a new inner-loop pressure stabilization circuit are devised to improve the frequency regulation and to damp the traveling wave effects. Simulation studies show the improvements of the proposed control designs.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Trudnowski, D. J., and Agee, J. C., 1995, “Identifying a Hydraulic-Turbine Model From Measured Field Data,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 10(4), pp. 768–773. [CrossRef]
Hannett, L. N., Feltes, J. W., Fardanesh, B., and Crean, W., 1999, “Modeling and Control Tuning of a Hydro Station With Units Sharing a Common Penstock Section,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 14, pp. 1407–1414. [CrossRef]
Hannett, L. N., 1994, “Field Tests to Validate Hydro Turbine-Governor Model Structure and Parameters,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 9, pp. 1744–1750. [CrossRef]
Chaudhry, M. H., 1987, Applied Hydraulic Transients, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
IEEE Working Group Report, 1992, “Hydro Turbine Control Models for System Dynamic Studies,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 7, pp. 167–179. [CrossRef]
Sanathanan, C. K., 1987, “Accurate Low Order Model for Hydraulic Turbine-Penstock,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2(2), pp. 196–200. [CrossRef]
Mansoor, S. P., Jones, D. I., Bradley, D. A., Aris, C., and Jones, G., 2000, “Reproducing Oscillatory Behaviour of a Hydroelectric Power Station by Computer Simulation,” Control Eng. Pract., 8, pp. 1261–1272. [CrossRef]
Franklin, G. F., Powell, J. D., and Emami-Naeini, A., 1994, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, Addison-Wesley, New York.
Streeter, V. L., and Wylie, E. B., 1975, Fluid Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wood, A. J., and Wollenberg, B. F., 1996, Power Generation Operation and Control, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.
Johnson, R. M., Chow, J. H., and Dillon, M. V., 2004, “Pelton Turbine Deflector Overspeed Control for a Small Power System,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 19(2), pp. 1032–1037. [CrossRef]
Chow, J. H., Javid, S. H., Sanchez-Gasca, J. J., Bowler, C. E. J., and Edmonds, J. S., 1986, “Torsional Mode Identification for Turbine-Generators,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 1(4), pp. 83–90. [CrossRef]
Benchluch, S. M., and Chow, J. H., 1993, “A Trajectory Sensitivity Method for the Identification of Nonlinear Excitation System Models,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 8(2), pp. 159–164. [CrossRef]
The MathWorks, Inc., 2002, Using MATLAB andSimulink, Version 6.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Needle control functional diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Needle servomotor block diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Elastic tunnel-penstock simulation diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

90 MW plant load rejection test data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Unit emergency shutdown test data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

6 MW unit load acceptance test data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Uncompensated single unit bode plots

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Governor regulator diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Traveling wave damper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Root locus with pressure stabilization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Response with pressure oscillation stabilizer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Compensated system frequency responses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Speed-loop gain scheduling time response

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In