Technical Briefs

A New Robust Filtering Strategy for Linear Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
S. A. Gadsden

e-mail: gadsden@mcmaster.ca

S. R. Habibi

e-mail: habibi@mcmaster.ca
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University,
1280 Main Street West,
Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7, Canada

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received February 2, 2011; final manuscript received March 4. 2012; published online October 30, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Won-jong Kim.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 135(1), 014503 (Oct 30, 2012) (9 pages) Paper No: DS-11-1025; doi: 10.1115/1.4006628 History: Received February 02, 2011; Revised March 04, 2012

For linear and well-defined estimation problems with Gaussian white noise, the Kalman filter (KF) yields the best result in terms of estimation accuracy. However, the KF performance degrades and can fail in cases involving large uncertainties such as modeling errors in the estimation process. The smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) is a relatively new estimation strategy based on sliding mode theory and has been shown to be robust to modeling uncertainties. The SVSF makes use of an existence subspace and of a smoothing boundary layer to keep the estimates bounded within a region of the true state trajectory. Currently, the width of the smoothing boundary layer is chosen based on designer knowledge of the upper bound of modeling uncertainties, such as maximum noise levels and parametric errors. This is a conservative choice, as a more well-defined smoothing boundary layer will yield more accurate results. In this paper, the state error covariance matrix of the SVSF is used for the derivation of an optimal time-varying smoothing boundary layer. The robustness and accuracy of the new form of the SVSF was validated and compared with the KF and the standard SVSF by testing it on a linear electrohydrostatic actuator (EHA).

© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

SVSF estimation concept

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Smoothed estimated trajectory ψ ≥ β [28]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Presence of chattering effect ψ < β [28]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Well-defined system case (SVSF–VBL strategy)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Presence of a fault or poorly-defined system case (SVSF–VBL strategy)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Summary of the SVSF–VBL strategy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Position estimates for the EHA computer experiment (normal case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Smoothing boundary layer widths (normal case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Position estimates for the EHA computer experiment (uncertainty case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Smoothing boundary layer widths (uncertainty case)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In