Research Papers

Developing Compact Models of Terrain Surfaces

[+] Author and Article Information
John B. Ferris

e-mail: jbferris@vt.edu
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
150 Slayton Avenue,
Danville, VA 24540

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received February 24, 2012; final manuscript received July 12, 2013; published online August 23, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Sean Brennan.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 135(6), 061008 (Aug 23, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: DS-12-1070; doi: 10.1115/1.4025016 History: Received February 24, 2012; Revised July 12, 2013

Terrain topology is the principal source of vertical excitation to the vehicle system and must be accurately represented in order to correctly predict the vehicle response. It is desirable to evaluate vehicle and tire models over a wide range of terrain types, but it is computationally impractical to simulate long distances of every terrain variation. This work seeks to study the terrain surface, rather than the terrain profile, to maximize the information available to the tire model (i.e., wheel path data), yet represent it in a compact form. A method to decompose the terrain surface as a combination of deterministic and stochastic components is presented. If some, or all, of the components of the terrain surface are considered to be stochastic, then the sequence can be modeled as a stochastic process. These stochastic representations of terrain surfaces can then be implemented in tire and vehicle models to predict chassis loads.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Creating a uniform grid (curved regular grid) in the horizontal plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Defining the surface coordinate system (u, v, s) in a CRG format

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Example of a discretized terrain surface in curved regular grid format

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Original terrain profile measured with VTMS of longitudinally tined concrete located at MnRoad test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

First two empirical basis vectors for a sample of U.S. Highway data, bl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

First two analytic basis vectors for a sample of U.S. Highway data, pl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

First two empirical components of terrain for a sample of U.S. Highway data, σi,l

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

First two analytic components of terrain, σi,l for a sample of U.S. Highway data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparing true surface to subsequent empirical truncated surfaces for a sample of U.S. Highway data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Partial autocorrelation of the second empirical component of terrain σi,2 for a sample of U.S. Highway data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Empirical bank angle component of terrain and AR synthesis of bank angle component of terrain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparing true surface to truncated surface with AR synthesized bank angle component of terrain




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In