Research Papers

Lumped-Parameter Modeling of an Immersion Flow Field for Analyzing Meniscus Dynamic Behavior

[+] Author and Article Information
Ying Chen

State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power
Transmission and Control,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou, 310027, China;
Georgia W. Woodruff School
of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
e-mail: yingchen@zju.edu.cn

Kok-Meng Lee

Georgia W. Woodruff School
of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0405;
State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing
Equipment and Technology,
School of Mechanical Science and Engineering,
Huazhong University of Science and Technology,
Wuhan 430074, China
e-mail: kokmeng.lee@me.gatech.edu

Chun-Yeon Lin

Georgia W. Woodruff School
of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
e-mail: cylin219@gatech.edu

Xin Fu

State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power
Transmission and Control,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou, 310027, China
e-mail: xfu@zju.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control. Manuscript received September 11, 2012; final manuscript received June 14, 2013; published online August 30, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Prashant Mehta.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 136(1), 011001 (Aug 30, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: DS-12-1298; doi: 10.1115/1.4024889 History: Received September 11, 2012; Revised June 14, 2013

Motivated by the interest to increase production throughputs of immersion lithography machines, wafers are scanned at increasingly high velocities and accelerations, which may result in liquid loss at the receding contact line. The dynamic characteristics of the immersion fluid with free boundary play an important role for fluid management system, and are concerned in various potential immersion unit designs. To offer intuitive insights into the dynamic effects of the immersion fluid due to scan speeds, a lumped-parameter model based on two-dimensional (2D) image data has been developed to characterize the 3D hydrodynamics of the immersion flow process. To validate the model, meniscus behavior information under dynamic conditions is extracted experimentally and analyzed using image processing techniques. The reduced model agrees qualitatively well with the experimental data.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bonn, D., Eggers, J., Indekeu, J., Meunier, J., and Rolley, E., 2009, “Wetting and Spreading,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 81(2), pp. 739–805. [CrossRef]
Blake, T. D., Dobson, R. A., and Ruschak, K. J., 2004, “Wetting at High Capillary Numbers,” J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 279(1), pp. 198–205. [CrossRef]
Bertrand, E., Bonn, D., Broseta, D., Dobbs, H., Indekeu, J. O., Meunier, J., Ragil, K., and Shahidzadeh, N., 2002, “Wetting of Alkanes on Water,” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 33(1–3), pp. 217–222. [CrossRef]
Bergeron, V., Bonn, D., Martin, J. Y., and Vovelle, L., 2000, “Controlling Droplet Deposition With Polymer Additives,” Nature, 405(6788), pp. 772–775. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tabeling, P., 2005, Introduction to Microfluidics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Bhattacharjee, B., and Najjaran, H., 2010, “Simulation of Droplet Position Control in Digital Microfluidic Systems,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 132(1), p. 014501. [CrossRef]
Chen, W. Y., Chen, Y., Zou, J., Fu, X., Yang, H. Y., Ruan, X. D., and Gong, G. F., 2009, “Effect of Liquid Dispensing on Flow Field for Immersion Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 27(5), pp. 2192–2199. [CrossRef]
Owa, S., and Nagasaka, H., 2003, “Immersion Lithography Exposure Tool Update,” Immersion Lithography Workshop, San Jose, CA.
Mulkens, J., Flagello, D., Streefkerk, B., and Graeupner, P., 2004, “Benefits and Limitations of Immersion Lithography,” J. Microlithogr. Microfabr. Microsyst., 3(1), pp. 104–114. [CrossRef]
El-Morsi, M., Nellis, G., Schuetter, S., Van Peski, C., and Grenville, A., 2005, “Full Wafer Simulation of Immersion Fluid Heating,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 23(6), pp. 2596–2600. [CrossRef]
Burnett, H., Shedd, T., Nellis, G., El-Morsi, M., Engelstad, R., Garoff, S., and Varanasi, K., 2005, “Control of the Receding Meniscus in Immersion Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, pp. 2611–2616. [CrossRef]
Schuetter, S., Shedd, T., Doxtator, K., Nellis, G., Van Peski, C., Grenville, A., Lin, S. H., and Owe-Yang, D. C., 2006, “Measurements of the Dynamic Contact Angle for Conditions Relevant To Immersion Lithography,” J. Microlithogr. Microfabr. Microsyst., 5(2), p. 023002. [CrossRef]
Schuetter, S. D., Shedd, T. A., and Nellis, G. F., 2007, “Prediction of the Velocity at Which Liquid Separates From a Moving Contact Line,” J. Micro-Nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS, 6(2), p. 023003. [CrossRef]
Harder, P. M., and Shedd, T. A., 2008, “Improved Model for Liquid Loss at a Dynamic Contact Line Including Behaviors of High-Index Fluids,” J. Micro-Nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS, 7(3), p. 033002. [CrossRef]
Winkels, K. G., Peters, I. R., Evangelista, F., Riepen, M., Daerr, A., Limat, L., and Snoeijer, J. H., 2011, “Receding Contact Lines: From Sliding Drops to Immersion Lithography,” Eur. Phys. J. –Spec. Top., 192(1), pp. 195–205. [CrossRef]
Kim, H., Grosse, S., Elsinga, G. E., and Westerweel, J., 2011, “Full 3D-3C Velocity Measurement Inside a Liquid Immersion Droplet,” Exp. Fluids, 51(2), pp. 395–405. [CrossRef]
Bush, J. W. M., and Aristoff, J. M., 2003, “The Influence of Surface Tension on the Circular Hydraulic Jump,” J. Fluid Mech., 489, pp. 229–238. [CrossRef]
Munson, B. R., Young, D. F., Okiishi, T. H., and Huebsch, W. W., 2009, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, J. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Chen, Y., Lee, K. M., and Fu, X., 2011, “Effect of Upper Surface Characteristics on Meniscus Stability in Immersion Flow Field,” Microelectron. Eng., 88(8), pp. 1939–1943. [CrossRef]
Gonzalez, R. C., Woods, R. E., and Eddins, S. L., 2009, Digital Image Processing UsingMATLAB, Gatesmark Pub., Knoxville, TN.
Chapra, S. C., and Canale, R. P., 2010, Numerical Methods for Engineers, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of immersion lithography

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Liquid deformation and symbols

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Lumped-parameter meniscus model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

x-stage velocity and displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Edge finding process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Curve fits of edge data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dynamic contact angles versus meniscus displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Meniscus transient responses (60 mm/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Meniscus transient responses (65 mm/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Dynamic contact angles (60 mm/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Dynamic contact angles (65 mm/s)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In