Research Papers

LMI Based Sliding Mode Surface Design With Mixed H2/H Optimization

[+] Author and Article Information
Shirin Valiloo

e-mail: sh.valiloo@gmail.com

Mohammad J. Khosrowjerdi

e-mail: khosrowjerdi@sut.ac.ir

Mohammad Salari

e-mail: salari@gmail.com

Department of Electrical Engineering,
Sahand University of Technology,
P.O. Box 51335-1996, Sahand,
Tabriz, Iran

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received April 24, 2013; final manuscript received September 22, 2013; published online October 15, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Srinivasa M. Salapaka.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 136(1), 011016 (Oct 15, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: DS-13-1167; doi: 10.1115/1.4025553 History: Received April 24, 2013; Revised September 22, 2013

In this paper sliding mode surface design is concerned with multi objective optimization for nonlinear continuous-time systems in the presence of matched and mismatched uncertainties and disturbances. In order to reduce the effect of uncertainties and disturbances on sliding motion, this problem is formulated as a well-motivated mixed H2/H optimization problem and a constructive algorithm based on linear matrix inequality (LMI) is proposed. We also give an LMI-based sliding mode control law to direct the system trajectories onto the designed sliding surface. Finally, using a numerical example, we show the effectiveness of proposed method.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Takahashi, R. H. C., and Peres, P. L. D., 1999, “H2 Guaranteed Cost Switching Surface Design for Sliding Modes With Nonmatching Disturbances,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 44, pp. 2214–2218. [CrossRef]
Gouaisbaut, F., Dambrine, M., and Richard, J. P., 2002, “Robust Control of Delay Systems: A Sliding Mode Control Design Via LMI,” Syst. Control Lett., 46(4), pp. 219–230. [CrossRef]
Choi, H. H., 2003, “An LMI-Based Switching Surface Design Method for a Class of Mismatched Uncertain Systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 48, pp. 1634–1638. [CrossRef]
Edwards, C. A., 2004, “A Practical Method for the Design of Sliding Mode Controllers Using Linear Matrix Inequalities,” Automatica, 40, pp. 1761–1769. [CrossRef]
Edwards, C., Fossas Colet, E., and Fridman, L. E., 2006, Advances in Variable Structure and Sliding Mode Control, Springer–Verlag, Berlin.
Choi, H. H., 2007, “LMI-Based Sliding Surface Design for Integral Sliding Mode Control of Mismatched Uncertain Systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 52, pp. 736–742. [CrossRef]
Park, P., Choi, D. J., and Kong, S. G., 2007, “Output Feedback Variable Structure Control for Linear Systems With Uncertainties and Disturbances,” Automatica, 43, pp. 72–79. [CrossRef]
Wang, H., Han, Z. Z., Xie, Q. Y., and Zhang, W., 2009, “Sliding Mode Control for Chaotic Systems Based on LMI,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 14(4), pp. 1410–1417. [CrossRef]
Wua, L., Sua, X., and Shib, P., 2012, “Sliding Mode Control With Bounded L2 Gain Performance of Markovian Jump Singular Time-Delay Systems,” Automatica, 48(8), pp. 1929–1933. [CrossRef]
Guo, B. Z., and Liu, J. J., 2013, “Sliding Mode Control and Active Disturbance Rejection Control to the Stabilization of One-Dimensional Schrödinger Equation Subject to Boundary Control Matched Disturbance,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 23(8), pp. 1012–1018. [CrossRef]
Sarvi, M., Soltani, I., Namazy Pour, N., and Rabbani, N., 2013, “A New Sliding Mode Controller for DC/DC Converters in Photovoltaic Systems,” J. Energy, 13(13), pp. 801–808. [CrossRef]
EL-Ghezawi, O. M. E., Zinober, A. S. I., and Billings, A. A., 1983, “Analysis and Design of Variable Structure Systems Using a Geometric Approach,” Int. J. Control, 38, pp. 657–671. [CrossRef]
Dorling, C. M., and Zinober, S. I., 1989, “Two Approaches to Hyperplane Design in Multivariable Structure Control Systems,” Int. J. Control, 44, pp. 65–82. [CrossRef]
Choi, H. H., 2008, “Output Feedback Variable Structure Control Design With an H2 Performance Bound Constraint,” Automatica, 44, pp. 2403–2408. [CrossRef]
Castanos, F., and Fridman, L., 2006, “Analysis and Design of Integral Sliding Manifolds for Systems With Unmatched Perturbations,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 51, pp. 853–858. [CrossRef]
Kim, K. S., and Park, Y., 2000, “Using Lyapunov Matrices for Sliding Mode Design,” Proceedings of the 39th Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2204–2209.
Kim, K. S., and Park, Y., 2004, “Sliding Mode Design Via Quadratic Performance Optimization With Pole-Clustering Constraint,” SIAM J. Control Optim., 43, pp. 670–684. [CrossRef]
Khargonekar, P. P., and Rotea, M. A., 1991, “Mixed H2/H∞ Control: A Convex Optimization Approach,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 36, pp. 824–837. [CrossRef]
Scherer, C. W., Gahinet, P., and Chilali, M., 1997, “Multi-Objective Output Feedback Control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 17, pp. 138–149.
Khosrowjerdi, M. J., Nikoukhah, R., and Safari-Shad, N., 2004, “A Mixed H2/H∞ Approach to Simultaneous Fault Detection and Control,” Automatica, 40, pp. 261–267. [CrossRef]
Scherer, C., and WeilandS., 1999, Lecture Notes DISC Course on Linear Matrix Inequalities in Control, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, p. 54.
Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., and Balakrishnan, V., 1994, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, “Studies in Applied Mathematics,” Vol. 15, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, p. 28.
Khargonekar, P. P., Petersen, I. R., and Zhou, K., 1990, “Robust Stabilization of Uncertain Linear Systems: Quadratic Stabilizability and H∞ Control Theory,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 35, pp. 356–361. [CrossRef]
Wang, Y., Xie, L., and deSousa, C. E., 1992, “Robust Control of a Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems,” Syst. Control Lett., 19, pp. 139–149. [CrossRef]
Bernstein, D. S., and Haddad, W. M.,1989, “LQG Control With an H∞ Performance Bound: A Riccati Equation Approach,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 34, pp. 293–305. [CrossRef]
Castanos, F., and Fridman, L., 2011, “Dynamic Switching Surfaces for Output Sliding Mode Control: An H∞ Approach,” Automatica, 47, pp. 1957–1961. [CrossRef]
Gahinet, P., Nemirovski, A., Laub, A. J., and Chilali, M., 1995, LMI Control Toolbox, The Math Works, Natick, MA.
El Ghaoui, L., Nikoukhah, R., Delebecque, F., and Commeau, J. L., 1998, “LMITOOL-2.0 Package: An Interface to Solve LMI Problems,” Optimization and Control Group, ENSTA, Paris, France.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Disturbance signal w(t)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

System closed loop behavior using H2 approach and θ = 1. Top: sliding surface value σ = Cx; bottom: states x(t).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

System closed loop behavior using mixed H2/H approach and θ = 1. Top: sliding surface value σ = Cx; bottom: states x(t).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Control effort u for θ = 1. Top: using H2 approach; bottom: using mixed H2/H approach.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

System closed loop behavior using H2 approach and θ = 10. Top: sliding surface value σ = Cx; bottom: states x(t).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

System closed loop behavior using mixed H2/H approach and θ = 10. Top: sliding surface value σ = Cx; bottom: states x(t).




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In