Technical Brief

Contractile Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Configured to Generate Extension

[+] Author and Article Information
Benjamin K. S. Woods, Shane M. Boyer, Erica G. Hocking

Graduate Research Assistant
Smart Structures Laboratory,
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742

Norman M. Wereley

Minta Martin Professor and
Department Chair
Fellow ASME
Smart Structures Laboratory,
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: wereley@umd.edu

Curt S. Kothera

Senior Research Engineer
InnoVital Systems, Inc.,
Beltsville, MD 20705

1Present address: Senior Research Officer, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received August 4, 2012; final manuscript received December 15, 2013; published online January 29, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Nariman Sepehri.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 136(3), 034501 (Jan 29, 2014) (3 pages) Paper No: DS-12-1248; doi: 10.1115/1.4026308 History: Received August 04, 2012; Revised December 15, 2013

Pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs) are comprised of an elastomeric bladder surrounded by a braided mesh sleeve. When the bladder is inflated, the actuator may either contract or extend axially, with the direction of motion dependent on the orientation of the fibers in the braided sleeve. Contractile PAMs have excellent actuation characteristics, including high specific power, specific work, and power density. Unfortunately, extensile PAMs exhibit much reduced blocked force, and are prone to buckling under axial compressive loading. For applications in which extensile motion and compressive force are desired, the push-PAM actuator introduced here exploits the operational characteristics of a contractile PAM, but changes the direction of motion and force by employing a simple internal mechanism using no gears or pulleys. Quasi-static behavior of the push-PAM was compared to a contractile PAM for a range of operating pressures. Based on these data, the push-PAM actuator can achieve force and stroke comparable to a contractile PAM tested under the same conditions.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Caldwell, D., Tsagarakis, N., and Medrano-Cerda, G. A., 2000, “Bio-mimetic Actuators: Polymeric Pseudo Muscular Actuators and Pneumatic Muscle Actuators for Biological Emulation,” Mechatronics, 10(4–5), pp. 499–530. [CrossRef]
Robinson, R. M., Kothera, C. S., Woods, B. K. S., Vocke, R. D., III, and Wereley, N. M., 2011, “High Specific Power Actuators for Robotic Manipulators,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 22(13), pp. 1501–1511. [CrossRef]
Woods, B. K. S., Kothera, C. S., and Wereley, N. M., 2011, “Wind Tunnel Testing of a Helicopter Rotor Trailing Edge Flap Actuated via Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 22(13), pp. 1513–1528. [CrossRef]
Vocke, R. D., III, Kothera, C. S., Chaudhuri, A., Woods, B. K. S., and Wereley, N. M., 2012, “Design and Testing of a High-specific Work Actuator Using Miniature Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 23(3), pp. 365–378. [CrossRef]
Woods, B. K. S., Gentry, M. F., Kothera, C. S., and Wereley, N. M., 2011, “Fatigue Life Testing of Swaged Pneumatic Artificial Muscles as Actuators for Aerospace Applications,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 23(3), pp. 327–343. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y., Yin, W., Liu, Y., and Leng, J., 2011, “Structural Design and Analysis of Morphing Skin Embedded with Pneumatic Muscle Fibers,” Smart Mater. Struct., 20, p. 085033. [CrossRef]
Philen, M. K., 2009, “On the Applicability of Fluidic Flexible Matrix Composite Variable Impedance Materials for Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices,” Smart Mater. Struct., 18, p. 104023. [CrossRef]
Trivedi, D., and Rahn, C. D., 2012, “Soft Robotic Manipulators: Design, Analysis, and Control,” Plants and Mechanical Motion: A Synthetic Approach to Nastic Materials and Structures, N. M.Wereley and J. M.Sater, eds., DEStech Publications, Inc., Lancaster, PA, pp. 141–165.
Davis, S., and Caldwell, D., 2006, “Braid Effects on Contractile Range and Friction Modeling in Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 25(4), pp. 359–369. [CrossRef]
Kothera, C. S., Jangid, M., Sirohi, J., and Wereley, N. M., 2009, “Experimental Characterization and Static Modeling of McKibben Actuators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131, p. 091010. [CrossRef]
De Volder, M., Moers, A. J. M., and Reynaerts, D., 2011, “Fabrication and Control of Miniature McKibben Actuators,” Sens. Actuat. A, 166(1), pp. 111–116. [CrossRef]
Solano, B., and Rotinat-Libersa, C., 2011, “Compact and Lightweight Hydraulic Actuation System for High Performance Millimeter Scale Robotic Applications: Modeling and Experiments,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 22(13), pp. 1479–1487. [CrossRef]
Hocking, E. G., and Wereley, N. M., 2013, “Analysis of Nonlinear Elastic Behavior in Miniature Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,” Smart Mater. Struct.22(1), p. 014016. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Z., and Philen, M. K., 2011, “Review: Pressurized Artificial Muscles,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 23(3), pp. 255–268. [CrossRef]
Tondu, B., 2012, “Modelling of the McKibben Artificial Muscle: A Review,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 23(3), pp. 225–253. [CrossRef]
Philen, M. K., Shan, Y., Prakash, P., Wang, K. W., Rahn, C. D., Zydney, A. L., and Bakis, C. E., 2007, “Fibrillar Network Adaptive Structure with Ion-Transport Actuation,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 18(4), pp. 323–334. [CrossRef]
Zhu, B., Rahn, C. D., and Bakis, C. E., 2011, “Actuation of Fluidic Flexible Matrix Composites in Structural Media,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 23(3), pp. 269–278. [CrossRef]
Woods, B. K. S., Wereley, N. M., Kothera, C. S., and Boyer, S. M., 2012, “Extensile Fluidic Muscle Actuator,” U.S. Patent Pending. Application No. 12/955,242.
Gelb, A., and Vander Velde, W. E., 1968, Multiple-input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 4–5.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of a push-PAM in its resting (top) and actuated (bottom) configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Actuators characterized in this study (contractile PAM above, and push-PAM for extensile motion below)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of measured actuator load lines at operating pressures of 207, 414, and 621 kPa, (a) Full experimental results and (b) Average force within hysteresis loop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Blocked force as a function of actuation pressure. The intercept of the line fit to the data with the actuation pressure axis determines the pressure dead-band.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In