0
Research Papers

Turbocharger Map Reduction for Control-Oriented Modeling

[+] Author and Article Information
Karla Stricker, Lyle Kocher, Ed Koeberlein

Cummins, Inc.,
Box 3005,
Columbus, IN 47202

D. G. Van Alstine

Caterpillar,
100 North East Adams Street,
Peoria, IL 61629

Gregory M. Shaver

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Purdue University,
585 Purdue Mall,
West Lafayette, IN 47907

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received March 30, 2011; final manuscript received May 18, 2012; published online April 4, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Marco P. Schoen.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 136(4), 041008 (Apr 04, 2014) (13 pages) Paper No: DS-11-1095; doi: 10.1115/1.4026532 History: Received March 30, 2011; Revised May 18, 2012

Models of the gas exchange process in modern diesel engines typically use manufacturer-provided maps to describe mass flows through, and efficiencies of, the turbine and compressor based on pressure ratios across the turbine and compressor, as well as the turbocharger shaft speed, and in the case of variable-geometry turbochargers, the nozzle position. These look-up maps require multiple interpolations to produce the necessary information for turbocharger performance, and are undesirable when modeling for estimation and control. There have been several previous efforts to reduce dependence on maps with general success, yet many of these approaches remain complex and are not easily integrated into engine control systems. The focus of this paper is the reduction of turbomachinery maps to analytical functions that are amenable to estimator and control design, and have been validated against manufacturer-provided turbomachinery data.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Variable-geometry turbocharger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Compressor mass flow maps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

New non-dimensional map: zoomed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Compressor efficiency maps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Compressor efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Original and non-dimensional turbine mass flow maps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Non-dimensional efficiency fits for the nine VGT positions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Original and non-dimensional turbine efficiency maps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Non-dimensional turbine maps with fits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Efficiency fits for the nine VGT positions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Logic flow comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Experimental engine schematic

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Example air-handling sweep

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Operating points on the compressor map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Operating points on the torque-speed map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Case 1 air handling sweep

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Case 2 air handling sweep

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Case 3 air handling sweep

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In