0
Research Papers

Real-Time Hybrid Switching Control of Automotive Cold Start Hydrocarbon Emission

[+] Author and Article Information
Rasoul Salehi

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Sharif University of Technology,
Tehran, Iran 1458889694
e-mail: r_salehi@mech.sharif.ir

Mahdi Shahbakhti

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Michigan Technological University,
Houghton, MI 49931
e-mail: mahdish@mtu.edu

J. Karl Hedrick

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of California,
Berkeley, CA 94720
e-mail: khedrick@me.berkeley.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received November 5, 2012; final manuscript received January 14, 2014; published online March 13, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Shankar Coimbatore Subramanian.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 136(4), 041002 (Mar 13, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: DS-12-1361; doi: 10.1115/1.4026534 History: Received November 05, 2012; Revised January 14, 2014

Reduction of cold start hydrocarbon (HC) emissions requires a proper compromise between low engine-out HC emission and fast light-off of the three way catalytic converter (TWC). In this paper, a hybrid switching system is designed and optimized for reducing HC emissions of a mid-sized passenger car during the cold start phase of FTP-75 (Federal Test Procedure). This hybrid system has the benefit of increasing TWC temperature during the early stages of the driving cycle by switching between different operational modes. The switching times are optimized to reduce the cumulative tailpipe HC of an experimentally validated automotive emission model. The designed hybrid system is tested in real-time on a real engine control unit (ECU) in a model-in-the-loop structure. The results indicate the new hybrid controller reduces the HC emissions over 6.5% compared to nonswitching cold start controller designs.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Weilenmann, M., Favez, Y., and R. A., 2009, “Cold-Start Emissions of Modern Passenger Cars at Different Low Ambient Temperatures and Their Evolution Over Vehicle Legislation Categories,” Atmos. Environ., 43(15), pp. 2419–2429. [CrossRef]
Henein, N., and Tagomori, M., 1999, “Cold-Start Hydrocarbon Emissions in Port-Injected Gasoline Engines,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 25(6), pp. 563–593. [CrossRef]
Asami, S., Cranmer, A., Shahbakhti, M., and Hedrick, J., 2011, “Model-Based Control Via Balanced Realization for Automotive Cold Start Hydrocarbon Reduction,” ASME Conference Proceedings, 2011(54761), pp. 755–762.
Lee, D., and Heywood, J., 2010, “Effects of Secondary Air Injection During Cold Start of SI Engines,” SAE Int. J. Eng., 3(2), pp. 182–196.
Zhou, Q., Sun, J., and Qiu, J., 2010, “Development of Control Strategy for SI Engine Cold Start,” Information and Automation Conference(ICIA), pp. 1618–1621.
Andrianov, D., Manzie, C., and Brear, M., 2012, “A Methodology for Minimising Emissions Constrained Cold Start Fuel Consumption,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-0894.
Sanketi, P., Zavala, J., Wilcutts, M., Kaga, T., and Hedrick, J., 2007, “MIMO Control for Automotive Coldstart,” 5th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control.
Sanketi, P. R., Zavala, J. C., and Hedrick, J. K., 2006, “Automotive Engine Hybrid Modelling and Control for Reduction of Hydrocarbon Emissions,” Int. J. Control, 79(5), pp. 449–464. [CrossRef]
Borrelli, F., Bemporad, A., Fodor, M., and Hrovat, D., 2001, “A Hybrid Approach to Traction Control,” Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 2034, Springer, Berlin, pp. 162–174.
Palladino, A., Aguirre, L., Fiengo, G., and de Castro Lima, R., 2010, “Modeling Priority Analysis Via Hybrid Petri Nets for an Internal Combustion Engine Management System,” American Control Conference, pp. 670–675.
Wang, J., 2008, “Hybrid Robust Air-Path Control for Diesel Engines Operating Conventional and Low Temperature Combustion Modes,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 16(6), pp. 1138–1151. [CrossRef]
Bayindir, K. C., Gozukucuk, M. A., and Teke, A., 2011, “A Comprehensive Overview of Hybrid Electric Vehicle: Powertrain Configurations, Powertrain Control Techniques and Electronic Control Units,” Energy Convers. Manage., 52(2), pp. 1305–1313. [CrossRef]
Wirasingha, S., and Emadi, A., 2011, “Classification and Review of Control Strategies for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60(1), pp. 111–122. [CrossRef]
Beydoun, A., Wang, L., Sun, J., and Sivashanka, S., 1998, “Hybrid Control of Automotive Powertrain Systems: A Case Study,” Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Vol. 1386, Springer, Berlin, pp. 33–48.
Balluchi, A., Di Benedetto, M., Pinello, C., Rossi, C., and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., 1997, “Cut-Off in Engine Control: A Hybrid System Approach,” Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 5, pp. 4720–4725.
Balluchi, A., Benvenuti, L., di Benedetto, M., Pinello, C., and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., 2000, “Automotive Engine Control and Hybrid Systems: Challenges and Opportunities,” Proc. IEEE, 88(7), pp. 888–912. [CrossRef]
Shahbakhti, M., Li, J., and Hedrick, J., 2012, “Early Model Based Verification of Automotive Control System Implementation,” American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 3587–3592.
Shaw, B. T., 2002, “Modelling and Control of Automotive Coldstart Hydrocarbon Emissions,” Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Sanketi, P. R., 2009, “Coldstart Modeling and Optimal Control Design for Automotive si Engines,” Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Eriksson, L., 2002, “Mean Value Models for Exhaust System Temperatures,” SAE Technical Paper (2002-01-0374).
Ranganathan, R. T. D., and Franchett, M., 2005, “Exhaust Manifold Gas Temperature Predictions Using System Level Data Driven Modelling,” SAE Technical Paper (2005-01-0698).
Xu, X., and Antsaklis, P., 2002, “Optimal Control of Switched Autonomous Systems,” Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 4, pp. 4401–4406.
Wardi, Y., Ding, X., Egerstedt, M., and Azuma, S., 2007, “On-Line Optimization of Switched-Mode Systems: Algorithms and Convergence Properties,” Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 5005–5010.
Kamgarpour, M., 2011, “Optimal Control of Hybrid Systems in Air Traffic Applications,” Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Egerstedt, M., Wardi, Y., and Delmotte, F., 2003, “Optimal Control of Switching Times in Switched Dynamical Systems,” Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 3, pp. 2138–2143.
Wardi, Y., Twu, P., and Egerstedt, M., 2010, “On-Line Optimal Timing Control of Switched Systems,” Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2137–2142.
Guzzella, L., and Onder, C. H., 2010, Introduction to Modeling and Control of Internal Combustion Engine Systems, Springer, New York.
Kiencke, U., and Nielsen, L., 2005, Automotive Control Systems for Engine, Driveline, and Vehicle, Springer, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Behavior of engine brake torque and engine raw HC rate versus exhaust gas temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Evolution of switching times with optimization step

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of the TWC conversion efficiency and temperature in three designed cold start control strategies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison among HC emissions of the designed control strategies: (a) engine raw cumulative HC, (b) tailpipe cumulative HC, and (c) mode schedule

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Model-in-the-loop setup used for real-time testing of the designed controller

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison between switching times from real-time and off-line computation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of the TWC performance among nonswitching and switching (off-line, real-time) cold start strategies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison between emission performance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Designed hybrid switching system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Evolution of eigenvalues for uncontrolled states x2 and x4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Control signals calculated by the SMC to the engine to follow the desired trajectories

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison between simulated and measured tailpipe HC emissions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Tracking performance of the designed controller

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

General structure of engine model and the designed MIMO controller

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Effect of oxygen sensor faults on the λ-controller performance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Gradient of tailpipe emission with respect to λ at different Tcat values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Increase of HCtp due to oxygen sensor fault. (a) fault in sensor gain and (b) fault in sensor response time (the results are from running the controller in real-time on the dSPACE ECU).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In