Technical Brief

Experimental Comparisons of Sliding Mode Controlled Pneumatic Muscle and Cylinder Actuators

[+] Author and Article Information
Ville Jouppila

Department of Mechanics and Design,
Tampere University of Technology,
Tampere 33720, Finland
e-mail: ville.jouppila@tut.fi

S. Andrew Gadsden

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McMaster University,
Hamilton ON, L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: gadsden@mcmaster.ca

Asko Ellman

Department of Mechanics and Design,
Tampere University of Technology,
Tampere 33720, Finland

1Corresponding authors.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received August 26, 2012; final manuscript received February 12, 2014; published online April 28, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Evangelos Papadopoulos.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 136(4), 044503 (Apr 28, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: DS-12-1278; doi: 10.1115/1.4026873 History: Received August 26, 2012; Revised February 12, 2014

Pneumatic muscle actuators offer a higher force-to-weight ratio compared to traditional cylinder actuators, and introduce stick-slip-free operation that offers an interesting option for positioning systems. Despite several advantages, pneumatic muscle actuators are commonly avoided in industrial applications, mainly due to rather different working principles. Due to the highly nonlinear characteristics of the muscle actuator and pneumatic system, a reliable control strategy is required. Although muscle actuators are widely studied, the literature lacks detailed studies where the performance for servo systems is compared with traditional pneumatic cylinders. In this paper, a pneumatic servo actuation system is compared with a traditional cylinder actuator. As the overall system dynamics are highly nonlinear and not well defined, a sliding mode control (SMC) strategy is chosen for the control action. In order to improve the tracking performance, an SMC strategy with an integral action (SMCI) is also implemented. The control algorithms are experimentally applied on the pneumatic muscle and the cylinder actuator, for the purposes of position tracking. The robustness of the systems are verified and compared by varying the applied loads.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Pierce, R. C., 1940, “Expansible Cover,” U.S. Patent No. 2,211,478.
De Haven, H., 1949, “Tensioning Device for Producing a Linear Pull,” U.S. Patent No. 2,483,088.
Gaylord, R. H., 1958, “Fluid Actuated Motor System and Stroking Device,” U.S. Patent No. 2,844,126.
Schulte, R. A., 1961, “The Characteristics of the McKibben Artificial Muscle,” The Applications of External Power in Prosthetics and Orthotics, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, pp. 94–115.
Chou, P., and Hannaford, B., 1996, “Measurement and Modeling of McKibben Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,” IEEE Trans. Robo. Autom., 12(1), pp. 90–102. [CrossRef]
Caldwell, D. G., Medrano-Cerda, G. A., and Bowler, C. J., 1997, “Investigation of Bipedal Robot Locomotion Using Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” IEEE Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Vol. 1, pp. 799–804.
Klute, G. K., and Hannaford, B., 2000, “Accounting for Elastic Energy Storage in McKibben Artificial Muscle Actuators,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 122(2), pp. 386–388. [CrossRef]
Tondu, B., and Lopez, P., 2000, “Modeling and Control of McKibben Artificial Muscles,” IEEE Control Syst., 20(2), pp. 15–38. [CrossRef]
Plettenburg, D. H., 2005, “Pneumatic Actuators: A Comparison of Energy-to-Mass Ratio's,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, pp. 545–549.
Festo, 2002, “Fluidic Muscle MAS,” Festo Brochure.
Caldwell, D. G., Medrano-Cerda, G. A., and Goodwin, M. J., 1995, “Control of Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” IEEE Control Syst., 15(1), pp. 40–48. [CrossRef]
Lilly, J. H., 2003, “Adaptive Tracking for Pneumatic Muscle Actuators in Bicep and Tricep Configurations,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 11(3), pp. 333–339. [CrossRef]
Medrano-Cerda, G. A., Bowler, C. J., and Caldwell, D. G., 1995, “Adaptive Position Control of Antagonistic Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, pp. 378–383.
Hesselroth, T., Sarkar, K., Van der Smagt, P., and Schulten, K., 1994, “Neural Network Control of a Pneumatic Robot Arm,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern., 24(1), pp. 28–38. [CrossRef]
Chan, S. W., Lilly, J. H., Repperger, D. W., and Berlin, J. E., 2003, “Fuzzy PD+I Learning Control for a Pneumatic Muscle,” 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, St. Louis, Vol. 1, pp. 278–283.
Balasubramanian, K., and Rattan, K. S., 2003, “Feedforward Control of a Nonlinear Pneumatic Muscle System Using Fuzzy Logic,” 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, St. Louis, Vol. 1, pp. 272–277.
Hildebrandt, A., Sawodny, O., Neumann, R., and Hartmann, A., 2002, “A Flatness Based Design For Tracking Control of Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Vision, Singapore, pp. 1151–1161.
Aschemann, H., and Hofer, E. P., 2004, “Flatness-Based Trajectory Control of Pneumatically Driven Carriage With Uncertainties,” Proceedings of 6th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems (NOLCOS 2004), F. Allgöwer and M. Zeitz, eds., Elsevier, Kidlington, Oxford, Vol. 1, pp. 225–230.
Carbonell, P., Jiang, Z. P., and Repperger, D. W., 2001, “Nonlinear Control of a Pneumatic Muscle Actuator: Backstepping vs. Sliding Mode,” IEEE Proceedings of International Conference on Control Applications, Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 167–172.
Lilly, J. H., and Yang, L., 2005, “Sliding Mode Tracking for Pneumatic Muscle Actuators in Opposing Pair Configuration,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 13(4), pp. 550–558. [CrossRef]
Aschemann, H., and Schindele, D., 2008, “Sliding-Mode Control of a High-Speed Linear Axis Driven by Pneumatic Muscle Actuators," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 11(55), pp. 3855–3864. [CrossRef]
Shen, X., 2010, “Nonlinear Model-Based Control of Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Actuator Systems,” Control Eng. Pract., 18(3), pp. 311–317. [CrossRef]
Tsagarakis, N., and Caldwell, D. G., 2000, “Improved Modeling and Assessment of Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 3641–3646.
Davis, S., Tsagarakis, N. G., Canderle, J., and Caldwell, D. G., 2003, “Enhanced Modeling and Performance in Braided Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 22(3–4), pp. 213–227. [CrossRef]
Davis, S., and Caldwell, D. G., 2006, “Braid Effects on Contractile Range and Friction Modeling in Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 25(4), pp. 359–369. [CrossRef]
Jouppila, V., Gadsden, S. A., and Ellman, A., 2010, “Modeling and Identification of a Pneumatic Muscle Actuator System Controlled by an On/Off Solenoid Valve,” Workshop Proceedings of the 7th International Fluid Power Conference, Aachen, Germany, pp. 167–182.
International Organization for Standardization, 1989, “Pneumatic Fluid Power—Components Using Compressible Fluids—Determination of Flow-Rate Characteristics,” Report No. ISO 6358:1989.
Utkin, V. I., 1978, Sliding Modes and Their Application in Variable Structure Systems, Mir Publishers, Moscow.
Slotine, J. J. E., and Li, W., 1991, Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice-Hall, NJ, Chap. VII.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Nonlinear muscle actuator force characteristics, maximum cylinder force, and specified operating region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Pneumatic servo system with muscle actuators (middle) and cylinder actuator (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Servo mass flow rate and (b) servo mass flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Sinusoidal tracking with 1.5 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Point-to-point positioning with muscle configuration. (b) Point-to-point positioning with cylinder configuration.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Sinusoidal tracking with 0.25 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Sinusoidal tracking with 1.0 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Robustness to payload variation



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In