Research Papers

Teleoperation Systems Design Using Singular Perturbation Method and Sliding Mode Controllers

[+] Author and Article Information
Soheil Ganjefar

Associate professor
Department of Electrical Engineering,
Bu-Ali Sina University,
e-mail: s_ganjefar@basu.ac.ir

Mohammad Hadi Sarajchi, S. Mahmoud Hoseini

Department of Electrical Engineering,
Bu-Ali Sina University,

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received December 14, 2012; final manuscript received March 8, 2014; published online May 22, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Won-jong Kim.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 136(5), 051005 (May 22, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: DS-12-1420; doi: 10.1115/1.4027164 History: Received December 14, 2012; Revised March 08, 2014

The purpose of designing a controller for a teleoperation system is to achieve stability and optimal operation in the presence of factors such as time-delay, system disturbance, and modeling errors. This paper proposes a new method of controller design based on singular perturbation for the bilateral teleoperation of robots through Internet. This study provides sliding mode controller based on the singular perturbation model which is robust on time-varying delay. Using singular perturbation method, the teleoperation system is decomposed into fast and slow subsystems. Teleoperation systems usually have complex dynamic and controller designing is difficult for them. This method is a novel step toward reducing order modeling. In this paper, teleoperation system dynamic was decomposed into two states, slave and error (different from master and slave) and a sliding mode controller was designed for each state. Despite the communication channel in teleoperation systems, it is difficult and almost impossible to design controller based on full-order system. Therefore, many researchers have focused on controller design based on master and slave subsystems. This study shows that the singular perturbation is a proper method for controller design in master or slave, based on slave and error subsystem models with the effect on the total system. It is intended here to reduce the tracking error between the master and the slave. For different values of time-delay, the positions of master-slave were compared. This comparison was also applied for master and slave control signals based on singular perturbation. In all schemes, the effectiveness of the system was shown through simulations and comparisons between the various schemes were presented.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Sheridan, T. B., 1995, “Teleoperation, Telerobotics and Telepresence: A progress Report,” Control Eng. Pract., 3(2), pp. 204–214. [CrossRef]
Micaelli, A., Marchal, P., and Vertut, J., 1981, “Short Transmission Delay on a Force Reflective Bilateral Manipulator,” Proceedings of the 4th Rom_An, Sywarsaw, pp. 269–275.
Lawrence, D. A., 1993, “Stability and Transparency in Bilateral Teleoperation,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., 9(5), pp. 624–637. [CrossRef]
Hashtrudi-zaad, K., and Salcudean, S. E., 2001, “Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems With Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 20(6), pp. 419–445. [CrossRef]
Kwon, D. S., Hannaford, B., and Ryu, J. H., 2004, “Stable Teleoperation With Time-Domain Passivity Control,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., 20(2), pp. 365–373. [CrossRef]
Momeni, H. R., Sharafat, A. R., and Kamrani, E., 2005, “A Novel Adaptive Control System for Stable Teleoperation via Internet,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Toronto, Canada, pp. 1164–1169.
Postigo, J., and Slawinski, V. E., 2007, “Bilateral Teleoperation Through the Internet,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 55(3), pp. 205–215.
Sirouspour, S., Shahdi, A., and Setoodeh, P., 2006, “Discrete-time Multi-model Control for Cooperative Teleoperation under Time Delay,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, FL, pp. 2921–2926.
Stramigioli, S., Fantuzzi, C., and Secchi, C., 2008, “Variable Delay in Scaled-Port-Hamiltonian Telemanipulation,” Mechatronics, 18(7), pp. 357–363. [CrossRef]
Preusche, C., and Ryu, J. H., 2007, “Stable Bilateral Control of Teleoperators Under Time-Varying Communication Delay: Time Domain Passivity Approach,” 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3508–3513.
Artigas, J., Preusche, C., and Ryu, J. H., 2010, “A Passive Bilateral Control Scheme for a Teleoperator With Time-Varying Communication Delay,” Mechatronics, 20(7), pp. 812–823. [CrossRef]
Momeni, H. R., Janabi-sharifi, F., and Hosseini-Suny, K., 2010, “A Modified Adaptive Controller Design for Teleoperation Systems,” Robot. Autom. Syst., 58(5), pp. 676–683. [CrossRef]
Song, J. B., Cho, C., Kang, S., Kim, M., and Ryu, D., 2010, “Development of a Six DOF Haptic Master for Teleoperation of a Mobile Manipulator,” Mechatronics, 20(2), pp. 181–191. [CrossRef]
Seo, C., Kim, J. P., Ryu, J., and Park, S., 2011, “Robustly Stable Rate-Mode Bilateral Teleoperation Using an Energy-Bounding Approach,” Mechatronics, 21(1), pp. 176–184. [CrossRef]
Sheng, L. H., Liu, G. P., and Yang, X. H., 2011, “An Adaptive Teleoperation Based on Predictive Control,” Proc. Eng., 16, pp. 151–156. [CrossRef]
Jiang, Z. C., Tang, G. J., and Zhou, J. Y., 2012, “A New Approach for Teleoperation Rendezvous and Docking With Time Delay,” Sci. China Phys. Mech., 55(2), pp. 339–346. [CrossRef]
Talebi, H. A., Sedigh, A. K., and Forouzantabar, A., 2012, “Bilateral Control of Master–Slave Manipulators With Constant Time Delay,” ISA Trans., 51(1), pp. 74–80. [CrossRef]
Khalil, H., O'Reilly, J., and Kokotovic, P., 1999, Singular Perturbation Methods in Control Analysis and Design, Academic Press, London.
Fenichel, N., 1971, “Persistence and Smoothness of Invariant Manifolds for Flows,” Ind. Univ. Math. J., 21, pp. 193–226. [CrossRef]
Fenichel, N., 1974, “Asymptotic Stability With Rate Conditions,” Ind. Univ. Math. J.,23, pp. 1109–1137. [CrossRef]
Fenichel, N., 1977, “Asymptotic Stability With Rate Conditions, II,” Ind. Univ. Math. J.,26, pp. 81–93. [CrossRef]
Pugh, C. C., Shub, M., and HirschM. W., 1977, Invariant Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, New York.
Siddarth, A., and Valasek, J., 2011, “Global Tracking Control Structures for Nonlinear Singularly Perturbed Aircraft Systems,” Proceedings of the CEAS EuroGNC, April, Munich, Germany, pp. 13–15.
Ricardo, P., Marco, D. S., and Teixeira, A., 2012, “Regularization and Singular Perturbation Techniques for Non-Smooth Systems,” Physica D,24(22), pp. 1948–1955. [CrossRef]
Sheridan, T. B., 1992, Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control, The MIT Press, Cambrige, MA.
Spong, D. J., and Lee, M. W., 2006, “Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Constant Time-Delay,” IEEE Trans. Robot., 22(2), pp. 269–281. [CrossRef]
Craig, J. J., 1989, Introduction to Robotics, Mechanics and Control, 2nd ed, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA.
Janabi-Sharifi, F., 1995, “Modelling, Simulation and Identification of Robotic Manipulators Interacting With Environments,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst., 13(1), pp. 1–44. [CrossRef]
Pinto, M. A., Trofimchuk, S. I., and Ivanov, A. F., 2000, “Global Behavior in Nonlinear System With Delayed Feedback,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, Vol. 5, pp. 4420–4421.
Ivanov, A. F., and Sharkovsky, A. N., 1991, “Oscillations in Singularly Perturbed Delay Equations,” Dyn. Report., 1, pp. 165–224. [CrossRef]
Reinoso, O., Sabater, J. M., Perez, C., and Azorin, J. M., 2003, “A New Control Method of Teleoperation With Time Delay,” The International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Coimbra, Portugal, pp. 100–105.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Structure of teleoperation systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Position-position structure of 1-DOF linear type teleoperation system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Diagram of 1-DOF manipulator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Master and slave positions for time-delay 100 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Master and slave control signals for time-delay 100 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Master and slave positions for time-delay 500 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Master and slave control signals for time-delay 500 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Master and slave positions for time-delay 1000 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Master and slave control signals for time-delay 1000 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Time-varying delay

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Master and slave positions for time-varying delay

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Master and slave control signals for time-varying delay




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In