0
Technical Brief

On Constrained and Energy Efficient Balance Control of a Standing Biped: Experimentation and Stability Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Yuming Sun

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: umsun82@cc.umanitoba.ca

Mansoor Alghooneh

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: umalghoo@cc.umanitoba.ca

Yun-Hsiang Sun

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: suny3411@myumanitoba.ca

Christine Qiong Wu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: Christine.Wu@umanitoba.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received July 4, 2013; final manuscript received March 20, 2014; published online July 9, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Hashem Ashrafiuon.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 136(5), 054504 (Jul 09, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: DS-13-1260; doi: 10.1115/1.4027288 History: Received July 04, 2013; Revised March 20, 2014

Balancing control is important for biped standing. In spite of large efforts, it is very difficult to design balancing control strategies satisfying three requirements simultaneously: maintaining postural stability, improving energy efficiency, and satisfying the constraints between the biped feet and the ground. To implement such a control, inclusion of the actuators' dynamics is necessary, which complicates the overall system, obstructs the control design, and makes stability analysis more difficult. In this paper, a constrained balancing control meeting all three requirements is designed for a standing bipedal robot. The dynamics of the selected actuators has been considered for developing the motion equations of the overall control system, which has usually been neglected in simulations. In addition, stability analysis of such a complex biped control system has been provided using the concept of Lyapunov exponents (LEs), which shows the significance of actuators' dynamics on the stability region. The paper contributes to balancing standing biped in both the theoretical and the practical sense.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Masani, K., Vette, A. H., and Popovic, M. R., 2006, “Controlling Balance During Quiet Standing: Proportional and Derivative Controller Generates Preceding Motor Command to Body Sway Position Observed in Experiments,” Gait Posture, 23(2), pp. 164–172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gatev, P., Thomas, S., Kepple, T., and Hallett, M., 1999, “Feedforward Ankle Strategy of Balance During Quiet Stance in Adults,” J. Physiol., 514(3), pp. 915–928. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pai, Y., and Patton, J., 1997, “Center of Mass Velocity-Position Predictions for Balance Control,” J. Biomech., 30(4), pp. 347–354. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yang, C., Wu, Q., and Joyce, G., 2007, “Effects of Constraints on Bipedal Balance Control During Standing,” Int. J. Humanoid Rob., 4(4), pp. 753–775. [CrossRef]
Kuo, A. D., 1995, “An Optimal Control Model for Analyzing Human Postural Balance,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 42(1), pp. 87–101. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dariush, B., Hemami, H., and Parnianpour, M., 2001, “Multi-Modal Analysis of Human Motion From External Multi-Modal Analysis of Human Motion From External Measurements,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 123(2), pp. 272–278. [CrossRef]
Lower, M., 2008, “Simulation Model of Human Individual in Quiet Standing Based on an Inverted Pendulum With Fuzzy Controller,” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, pp. 3418–3422.
Colbaugh, R., Barany, E., and Glass, K., 1997, “Global Stabilization of Uncertain Manipulators Using Bounded Controls,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 86–91.
Luca, A. D., Siciliano, B., and Zollo, L., 2005, “PD Control With On-Line Gravity Compensation for Robots With Elastic Joints: Theory and Experiments,” Automatica, 41(10), pp. 1809–1819. [CrossRef]
Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Jose, R., and Cervantes, I., 2003, “Semiglobal Stability of Saturated Linear PID Control for Robot Manipulators,” Automatica, 39(6), pp. 989–995. [CrossRef]
Shen, X., and Christ, D., 2011, “Design and Control of Chemomuscle: A Liquid-Propellant-Powered Muscle Actuation System,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 133(2), p. 021006. [CrossRef]
Ghorbani, R., Wu, Q., and Wang, G. G., 2007, “Nearly Optimal Neural Network Stabilization of Bipedal Standing Using Genetic Algorithm,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 20(4), pp. 473–480. [CrossRef]
Sun, Y., and Wu, C. Q., 2012, “Stability Analysis via the Concept of Lyapunov Exponents: A Case Study in Optimal Controlled Biped Standing,” Int. J. Control, 85(12), pp. 1952–1966. [CrossRef]
Chevallereau, C., and Aoustin, Y., 2001, “Optimal Reference Trajectories for Walking and Running of a Biped Robot,” Robotica, 19, pp. 557–569. [CrossRef]
Bertec, Co., 2014, Bertec Instrumented-Treadmills, http://bertec.com/products/instrumented-treadmills.html
Stefanski, A., 2000, “Estimation of the Largest Lyapunov Exponent in Systems With Impacts,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, 11(15), pp. 2443–2451. [CrossRef]
Dingwell, J. B., and Cusumano, J. P., 2000, “Nonlinear Time Series Analysis of Normal and Pathological Human Walking,” Chaos, 10(4), pp. 848–863. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kinsner, W., 2006, “Characterizing Chaos Through Lyapunov Metrics,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern., Part C, 36(2), pp. 141–151. [CrossRef]
Polo, M. P., Albertos, P., and Galiano, J. A. B., 2008, “Tuning of a PID Controlled Gyro by Using the Bifurcation Theory,” Syst. Control Lett., 57(1), pp. 10–17. [CrossRef]
Zribi, M., Oteafy, A., and Smaoui, N., 2009, “Controlling Chaos in the Permanent Magnet Syschronous Motor,” Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 41(3), pp. 1266–1276. [CrossRef]
Oseledec, V. I., 1968, “A Multiplicative Ergodic Theorem: Lyapunov Characteristic Numbers for Dynamical System,” Trans. Moscow Math. Soc., 19, pp. 197–231.
Wolf, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L., and Vastano, J. A., 1985, “Determining Lyapunov Exponents From a Time Series,” Physics D, 16, pp. 285–317. [CrossRef]
Brown, R., Bryant, P., and Abarbanel, H. D. I., 1991, “Computing the Lyapunov Spectrum of a Dynamical System From an Observed Time Series,” Phys. Rev. A, 43, pp. 2787–2806. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Williams, G. P., 1997, Chaos Theory Tamed, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.
Slotine, J.-J. E., and Li, W., 1991, Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice Hall, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) The simplified biped model; (b) the free body diagram of the two-link inverted pendulum; and (c) the free body diagram of the foot-link

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Block diagram of GA-based PID control

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Experimental setup: (a) the control system, (b) the Bertec's fully instrumented treadmill [15], and (c) a side view of the treadmill and the standing robot

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Performance of the convergence test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Evolution of (a) the angle and the angular speed of the lower link; (b) the angle and the angular speed of the upper link; (c) two control torques applied at the ankle joint and the hip joint, respectively; and (d) two voltage signals generated by the PID controllers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Evolution of (a) the vertical ground reaction force; (b1) and (b2) the horizontal ground reaction force; and (c) the location of COP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Evolution of the system Lyapunov exponents. The converged value of each exponent has been shown as the Y reading of the datatip in the corresponding subplot, while the X reading reflects the time the system has progressed over.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Stability regions of the controlled robot: The area surrounded by blue circles is the stability region for the real one-legged robot actuated by the GA-based controller, the area encompassed by green squares is the stability region for the simulation model with the identical mass geometry and the same controller, but without incorporation of the motor dynamics

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In