Research Papers

A Lumped-Parameter Modeling Methodology for One-Dimensional Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations Describing Nonlinear Wave Propagation in Fluids

[+] Author and Article Information
Stephanie Stockar

Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Center for Automotive Research,
The Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH 43212
e-mail: stockar.1@osu.edu

Marcello Canova, Giorgio Rizzoni

Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Center for Automotive Research,
The Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH 43212

Yann Guezennec

Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Center for Automotive Research,
The Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH 43212

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received February 4, 2013; final manuscript received June 24, 2014; published online August 28, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Yang Shi.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 137(1), 011002 (Aug 28, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: DS-13-1059; doi: 10.1115/1.4027924 History: Received February 04, 2013; Revised June 24, 2014

Modeling the transient response of compressible fluid systems using dynamic systems theory is relevant to various engineering fields, such as gas pipelines, compressors, or internal combustion engines. Many applications, for instance, real-time simulation tools, system optimization, estimation and control would greatly benefit from the availability of predictive models with high fidelity and low calibration requirements. This paper presents a novel approach for the solution of the nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) describing unsteady flows in compressible fluid systems. A systematic methodology is developed to operate model-order reduction of distributed-parameter systems described by hyperbolic PDEs. The result is a low-order dynamic system, in the form of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which enables one to apply feedback control or observer design techniques. The paper combines an integral representation of the conservation laws with a projection based onto a set of eigenfunctions, which capture and solve the spatially dependent nature of the system separately from its time evolution. The resulting model, being directly derived from the conservation laws, leads to high prediction accuracy and virtually no calibration requirements. The methodology is demonstrated in this paper with reference to classic linear and nonlinear problems for compressible fluids, and validated against analytical solutions.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Rasmussen, B., and Alleyne, A., 2004, “Control-Oriented Modeling of Transcritical Vapor Compression Systems,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 126(1), pp. 54–64. [CrossRef]
Gruhle, W. D., and Isermann, R., 1985, “Modeling and Control of a Refrigerant Evaporator,” ASME J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control, 107(4), pp. 235–240. [CrossRef]
Palm, W., 2005, System Dynamics, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York.
Mohitpour, M., Thompson, W., and Asante, B., 1996, “Importance of Dynamic Simulation on the Design and Optimization of Pipeline Transmission Systems,” Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 9–14, Vol. 2, pp. 1183–1188.
Aalto, H., 2008, “Transfer Functions for Natural Gas Pipeline Systems,” Proceedings of the IFAC 17th World Congres s, Seoul, Korea, July 6–11.
Abbaspour, M., and Chapman, K., 2008, “Nonisothermal Transient Flow in Natural Gas Pipeline,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 75(3), p. 031018. [CrossRef]
Zhang, G., and Assanis, D., 2003, “Manifold Gas Dynamics Modeling and its Coupling With Single-Cylinder Engine Models Using Simulink,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 125(2), pp. 563–571. [CrossRef]
Turin, R., and Geering, H., 1994, “Model-Based Adaptive Fuel Control in an SI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 940374.
Stefanopoulou, A., Cook, J., Grizzle, J., and Freudenberg, J., 1998, “Control-Oriented Model of a Dual Equal Variable Cam Timing Spark Ignition Engine,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 120(2), pp. 257–266. [CrossRef]
Stefanopoulou, A., Cook, J., Freudenberg, J., Grizzle, J., Haghgooie, M., and Szpak, P., 1995, “Modeling and Control of a Spark Ignition Engine With Variable Cam Timing,” Proceedings of the IEEE American Control Conference, Seattle, WA, June 21–23, Vol. 4, pp. 2576–2581.
Pfiffner, R., Weber, F., Amstutz, A., and Guzzella, L., 1997, “Modeling and Model-Based Control of Supercharged SI-Engines for Cars With Minimal Fuel Consumption,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference.
Doebelin, E., 1998, System Dynamics: Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Design, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Karnopp, D., Margolis, R., and Rosenberg, R., 1990, System Dynamics: A Unified Approach, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
Karnopp, D., 1978, “Pseudo Bond Graphs for Thermal Energy Transport,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 100(3), pp. 165–169. [CrossRef]
Karnopp, D., 1979, “State Variables and Pseudo Bond Graphs for Thermofluid Systems,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 101(3), pp. 201–203. [CrossRef]
Margolis, D., 1979, “Bond Graph Fluid Line Models for Inclusion With Dynamic Systems Simulation,” J. Franklin Inst., 308, pp. 255–268. [CrossRef]
Margolis, D., 2002, “Bond Graphs for 1-Dimensional Duct Flows Using Nonlinear Finite Lumps,” Simulation Series, 35(2), pp. 65–71.
Tan, J., Stelson, K., and Janni, K., 1994, “Compressible-Flow Modeling With Pseudo Bond Graphs,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 116(2), pp. 272–280. [CrossRef]
Brown, F., 2002, “Non-Iterative Evaluation of Multiphase Thermal Compliances in Bond Graphs,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part I, 216(1), pp. 13–19. [CrossRef]
Brown, F., 2006, Engineering System Dynamics: A Unified Graph-Centered Approach, Vol. 8, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Stockar, S., Canova, M., Guezennec, Y., Rizzoni, G., and Follen, K., 2011, “A System Dynamics Modeling Methodology to Predict Transient Phenomena in Compressible Fluid Flow Systems,” Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Arlington, VA, Oct. 31–Nov. 2.
Shapiro, A., 1977, The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Horlock, J. H., and Winterbone, D. E., 1986, “The Thermodynamics and Gas Dynamics of Internal Combustion Engines,” Vol. 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
Winterbone, D., and Pearson, R., 2005, Theory of Engine Manifold Design: Wave Action Methods for IC Engines, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Montenegro, G., Onorati, A., Della Torre, A., and Torregrosa, A., 2011, “The 3Dcell Approach for the Acoustic Modeling of After-Treatment Devices,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 4(2), pp. 2519–2530, SAE Technical Paper 2011-24-0215. [CrossRef]
Diamantaras, K., and Kung, S., 1996, Principal Component Neural Networks: Theory and Applications, Wiley, New York.
Chatterjee, A., 2000, “An Introduction to the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition,” Curr. Sci., 78(7), pp. 808–817.
Onorati, A., Perotti, M., and Rebay, S., 1997, “Modeling One-Dimensional Unsteady Flows in Ducts: Symmetric Finite Difference Schemes Versus Galerkin Discontinuous Finite Element Methods,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 39(11), pp. 1213–1236. [CrossRef]
Schiesser, W., 1991, The Numerical Method of Lines: Integration of Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 29, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., and Lewy, H., 1967, “On the Partial Difference Equations of Mathematical Physics,” IBM J. Res. Development, 11(2), pp. 215–234. [CrossRef]
Sod, G., 1978, “A Survey of Several Finite Difference Methods for Systems of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Conservation Laws,” J. Comput. Phys., 27(1), pp. 1–31. [CrossRef]
Toro, E., 2009, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Strand, K., and Engja, H., 1991, “Bond Graph Interpretation of One-Dimensional Fluid Flow,” J. Franklin Inst., 328, pp. 781–793. [CrossRef]
Onorati, A., and Ferrari, G., 1998, “Modeling of 1-D Unsteady Flows in IC Engine Pipe Systems: Numerical Methods and Transport of Chemical Species,” SAE Technical Paper No. 980782.
Pearson, R., and Winterbone, D., 1993, “Calculating the Effects of Variations in Composition on Wave Propagation in Gases,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 35(6), pp. 517–537. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of one-dimensional control volume

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of a staggered grid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of straight pipe with the orifice termination

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison between analytical and ROM solution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Sensitivity of the frequency resolution to number of lumps and SBF order

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Distribution of the flow variables in the shock tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of the mesh size on the accuracy and prediction ability of the model (quadratic SBF)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In