0
Technical Brief

Stochastic Model Predictive Control for Guided Projectiles Under Impact Area Constraints

[+] Author and Article Information
Jonathan Rogers

Assistant Professor
Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received November 19, 2013; final manuscript received June 25, 2014; published online October 21, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Dejan Milutinovic.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 137(3), 034503 (Oct 21, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: DS-13-1453; doi: 10.1115/1.4028084 History: Received November 19, 2013; Revised June 25, 2014

The dynamics of guided projectile systems are inherently stochastic in nature. While deterministic control algorithms such as impact point prediction (IPP) may prove effective in many scenarios, the probability of impacting obstacles and constrained areas within an impact zone cannot be accounted for without accurate uncertainty modeling. A stochastic model predictive guidance algorithm is developed, which incorporates nonlinear uncertainty propagation to predict the impact probability density in real-time. Once the impact distribution is characterized, the guidance system aim point is computed as the solution to an optimization problem. The result is a guidance law that can achieve minimum miss distance while avoiding impact area constraints. Furthermore, the acceptable risk of obstacle impact can be quantified and tuned online. Example trajectories and Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed stochastic control formulation in comparison to deterministic guidance schemes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Diagram of impact point prediction guidance parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Deterministic and stochastic impact point prediction guidance. Deterministic guidance follows the solid path; stochastic guidance follows the dashed path.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Obstacle geometry, example scenario

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Aim point evolution, for example scenario

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Monte Carlo dispersion patterns and mean-centered CEP rings for varying εp, example geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Obstacle impact probability versus εp, for example scenario

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Obstacle geometry, defilade case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Aim point evolution for stochastic IPP guidance, defilade case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Range versus altitude and zoom view of target area, defilade example case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Obstacle impact probability versus εp, defilade case

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In