0
Research Papers

Adaptive Semi-Active Suspension of Quarter-Vehicle With Magnetorheological Damper

[+] Author and Article Information
K. El Majdoub

University of Caen,
GREYC UMR CNRS,
Caen 14032, France

D. Ghani

Université Mohamed V,
Electric Engineering Department,
Rabat, Agdal 10000, Morocco

F. Giri

University of Caen,
GREYC UMR CNRS,
Caen 14032, France
e-mail: fouad.giri@unicaen.fr

F. Z. Chaoui

ENSET,
University Mohamed V,
Electric Engineering Department,
Rabat, Suissi 10100, Morocco

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received September 2, 2013; final manuscript received August 11, 2014; published online September 24, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Shankar Coimbatore Subramanian.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 137(2), 021010 (Sep 24, 2014) (12 pages) Paper No: DS-13-1337; doi: 10.1115/1.4028314 History: Received September 02, 2013; Revised August 11, 2014

This paper addresses the problem of controlling quarter-vehicle semi-active suspension systems. Presently, the suspension system involves a magnetorheological (MR) damper featuring hysteretic behavior captured through the Bouc–Wen model. The control objective is to regulate well the chassis vertical position despite the road irregularities. The difficulty of the control problem lies in the nonlinearity of the system model, the uncertainty of some parameters and the inaccessibility to measurements of the hysteresis internal state variable. The control design is performed using Lyapunov control design tools; it includes an observer providing online estimates of the hysteresis internal state and an adaptive state-feedback regulator. The adaptive controller, obtained by combining the state observer and the state-feedback regulator, is formally shown to meet the desired control objectives. This theoretical result is confirmed by several simulations. The latter illustrate the performances of the present adaptive controller and compare them with those of earlier control approaches and those of the passive suspension.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Yagiz, N., and Hacioglu, Y., 2008, “Backstepping Control of a Vehicle With Active Suspensions,” Control Eng. Pract., 16(12), pp. 1457–1467. [CrossRef]
Du, H., and Zhang, N., 2007, “H Control of Active Vehicle Suspensions With Actuator Time Delay,” J. Sound Vib., 301(1–2), pp. 236–252. [CrossRef]
Bohn, C., Cortabarria, A., Härtel, V., and Kowalczyk, K., 2004, “Active Control of Engine Induced Vibrations in Automotive Vehicles Using Disturbance Observer Gain Scheduling,” Control Eng. Pract., 12(8), pp. 1029–1039. [CrossRef]
Poussot-Vassal, C., Sename, O., Dugard, L., Gáspár, P., Szabó, Z., and Bokor, J., 2008, “A New Semi-Active Suspension Control Strategy Through LPV Technique,” Control Eng. Pract., 16(12), pp. 1519–1534. [CrossRef]
Kim, Y., Langari, R., and Hurlebaus, S., 2009, “Semi-Active Nonlinear Control of a Building With a Magnetorheological Damper System,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 23(2), pp. 300–315. [CrossRef]
Liu, Y., Matsuhisa, H., and Utsuno, H., 2008, “Semi-Active Vibration Isolation System With Variable Stiffness and Damping Control,” J. Sound Vib., 313(1–2), pp. 16–28. [CrossRef]
Spelta, C., Previdi, F., Savaresi, S. M., Fraternale, G., and Gaudiano, N., 2009, “Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Vibration Reduction in a Washing Machine,” Mechatronics, 19(3), pp. 410–421. [CrossRef]
Yao, G. Z., Yap, F. F., Chen, G., Li, W. H., and Yeo, S. H., 2002, “MR Damper and its Application for Semi-Active Control of Vehicle Suspension System,” Mechatronics, 12(7), pp. 963–973. [CrossRef]
Carlson, J. D., 1999, “Magnetorheological Fluid Actuators,” Adaptronics and Smart Structures: Basics, Materials and Applications, H.Janocha, ed., Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Çeşmeci, Ş. and Engin, T., 2010, “Modeling and Testing of a Field-Controllable Magnetorheological Fluid Damper,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 52(8), pp. 1036–1046.
Choi, S. B., and Lee, S. K., 2001, “A Hysteresis Model for the Field-Dependent Damping Force of a Magnetorheological Damper,” J. Sound Vib., 245(2), pp. 375–383. [CrossRef]
Jimenez, R., and Alvarez, L., 2002, “Real Time Identification of Structures With Magnetorheological Dampers,” Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 1017–1022.
Horvat, D., 1997, “Survey of Advanced Suspension Developments and Related Optimal Control Application,” Automatica, 33(10), pp. 1781–1817. [CrossRef]
Zin, A., Sename, O., Gàspàr, P., Dugard, L., and Bokor, J., 2006, “An LPV, Active Suspension Control for Global Chassis Technology: Design and Performance Analysis,” Proceedings of the IEEE American Control Conference (ACC), Minneapolis, MN, pp. 2945–2950.
Zapateiro, M., Pozo, F., Karimi, H. R., and Luo, N., 2012, “Semi-Active Control Methodologies for Suspension Control With Magnetorheological Dampers,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 17(2), pp. 370–380. [CrossRef]
Ahmadian, M., and Blanchard, E., 2011, “Non-dimensionalised Closed-Form Parametric Analysis of Semi-Active Vehicle Suspensions Using a Quarter-Car Model,” J. Veh. Syst. Dyn., 49(1–2), pp. 219–235. [CrossRef]
Ahmadian, M., and Vahdati, N., 2006, “Transient Dynamics of Semi-Active Suspensions With Hybrid Control,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 17(2), pp. 145–153. [CrossRef]
Choi, S. B., and Han, S. S., 2003, “H Control of Electrorheological Suspension System Subjected to Parameter Uncertaintie,” Mechatronics, 13(7), pp. 639–657.
Guo, D. L., Hu, H. Y., and Yi, J. Q., 2004, “Neural Network Control for a Semi-Active Vehicle Suspension With a Magnetorheological Damper,” J. Vib. Control, 10(3), pp. 461–471. [CrossRef]
Haiping, D., James, L., Cheung, K. C., Weihua, L., and Zhang, N., 2013, “Direct Voltage Control of MR Damper for Vehicle Suspensions,” J. Smart Struct., 22(10), p. 105016. [CrossRef]
Savaresi, S. M., and Spelta, C., 2007, “Mixed Skyhook and ADD: Approaching the Filtering Limits of Semi-Active Suspension,” J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 129(4), pp. 382–392. [CrossRef]
Giorgetti, N., Benporad, A., Tseng, H. E., and Hrovat, D., 2006, “Hybrid Model Predictive Control Application Toward Optimal Semi-Active Suspension,” Int. J. Control, 79(5), pp. 521–533. [CrossRef]
Khalil, H., 2003, Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Krstić, M., Kanellakopoulos, I., and Kokotovic, P., 1995, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Zin, A., Sename, O., Basset, M., Dugard, L., and Gissinger, G., 2004, “A Nonlinear Vehicle Bicycle Model for Suspension and Handling Control Studies,” Proceedings of the IFAC Conference on Advances in Vehicle Control and Safety AVCS, Genova, Italy, pp. 638–643.
Ikhouane, F., and Rodellar, J., 2007, Systems With Hysteresis Analysis, Identification and Control Using the Bouc–Wen Model, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Ioannou, P. A., and Fidan, B., 2006, Adaptive Control Tutorial, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
Ahmadian, M., and Pare, C. A., 2000, “A Quarter-Car Experimental Analysis of Alternative Semi-Active Control Methods,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 11(8), pp. 604–612. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Model of quarter vehicle with MR damper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Bouc–Wen model for MR damper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Vehicle suspension adaptive

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Bump road inputs where T1 = 1 s and T2 = 2 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) The vertical displacement motion of the sprung mass for the bump road input. Solid: semi-active suspension with MR damper; Dotted: passive suspension. (b) The vertical acceleration of the sprung mass for the bump road input. Solid: semi-active suspension with MR damper; Dotted: passive suspension.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

MR damper actuator force in the case of bump road input

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

MR damper actuator control voltage in the case of bump road input

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Road inputs with limited ramp where T1 = 1 s and T2 = 1.1 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

MR damper actuator force in the case of limited ramp input

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

MR damper actuator control voltage in the case of limited ramp input

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) The vertical displacement motion of the sprung mass for the limited ramp input. Solid: semi-active suspension with MR damper; Dotted: passive suspension. (b) The vertical acceleration of the sprung mass for the limited ramp input. Solid: semi-active suspension with MR damper; Dotted: passive suspension.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Road inputs with sinusoidal road input

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a) The vertical displacement motion of the sprung mass for the sinusoidal road input. Solid: semi-active suspension with MR damper; Dotted: passive suspension. (b) The vertical acceleration of the sprung mass for the sinusoidal road input. Solid: semi-active suspension with MR damper; Dotted: passive suspension.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

MR damper actuator force in the case of the sinusoidal road input

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

MR damper actuator control voltage in the case of the sinusoidal road input

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In