0
Research Papers

Compound Control Strategy Based on Active Disturbance Rejection for Selected Catalytic Reduction systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Jinbiao Ning

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McMaster University,
Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: ningj4@mcmaster.ca

Fengjun Yan

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McMaster University,
Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: yanfeng@mcmaster.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received March 31, 2014; final manuscript received October 7, 2014; published online December 10, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Gregory Shaver.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 137(5), 051008 (May 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: DS-14-1147; doi: 10.1115/1.4028790 History: Received March 31, 2014; Revised October 07, 2014; Online December 10, 2014

Urea-based selected catalytic reduction (SCR) systems are effective ways in diesel engine after-treatment systems to meet increasingly stringent emission regulations. To achieve high NOx reduction efficiency and low NH3 slip, the control of the SCR system becomes more challenging, especially in transient operating conditions with model uncertainties. To effectively address this issue, this paper proposed a compound control strategy with a switching mechanism between an active disturbance rejection (ADR) controller and a zero-input controller. The ADR controller estimates and rejects the total (internal and external) disturbances from the SCR system when the exhaust gas temperature is high and its variation is small. The zero-input controller is used to lower ammonia surface coverage ratio to avoid high ammonia slip when exhaust gas temperature suddenly rises. The proposed control strategy is validated through a high-fidelity GT-Power simulation for a light-duty diesel engine over steady states and federal test procedure (FTP-75) test cycle. Its effectiveness is demonstrated especially in rapidly transient conditions with model uncertainties.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

World Health Organization, 2006, WHO Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, and Sulfur Dioxide: Global Update 2005, WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland, Chap. XII.
Backman, H., Arve, K., Klingstedt, F., and Murzin, D. Y., 2006, “Kinetic Considerations of H2 Assisted Hydrocarbon Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO over Ag/Al2O3: II. Kinetic Modeling,” Appl. Catal., 304, pp. 86–92. [CrossRef]
Hsieh, M.-F., and Wang, J., 2010, “An Extended Kalman Filter for Ammonia Coverage Ratio and Capacity Estimations in the Application of Diesel Engine SCR Control and Onboard Diagnosis,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, Baltimore, MD, June 30–July 2, pp. 5874–5879. [CrossRef]
Johnson, T. V., 2010, “Review of Diesel Emissions and Control,” SAE World Congress, SAE Technical Paper No. 2010-01-0301. [CrossRef]
Willems, F., and Cloudt, R., 2011, “Experimental Demonstration of a New Model-Based SCR Control Strategy for Cleaner Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 19(5), pp. 1305–1313. [CrossRef]
Willems, F., Cloudt, R., Eijnden, E. V. D., Genderen, M. V., Verbeek, R., Jager, B. D., Boomsma, W., and Heuvel, I. V. D., 2007, “Is Closed-Loop SCR Control Required to Meet Future Emission Targets?,” SAE World Congress, SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-1574.
Hsieh, M.-F., and Wang, J., 2011, “Design and Experimental Validation of An Extended Kalman Filter-Based NOx Concentration Estimator in Selective Catalytic Reduction System Applications,” Control Eng. Pract., 19(4), pp. 346–353. [CrossRef]
Hsieh, M.-F., and Wang, J., 2010, “Observer-Based Estimation of Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalyst Ammonia Storage,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D, 224(9), pp. 1199–1211. [CrossRef]
McKinley, T. L., and Alleyne, A. G., 2012, “Adaptive Model Predictive Control of an SCR Catalytic Converter System for Automotive Applications,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 20(6), pp. 2458–2467. [CrossRef]
Devarakonda, M., Parker, G., Johnson, J., Strots, V., and Santhaam, S., 2008, “Model-Based Estimation and Control System Development in a Urea-SCR After-Treatment System,” SAE World Congress, SAE Technical Paper No. 2008-01-1324.
Gao, Z., Huang, Y., and Han, J., 2001, “An Alternative Paradigm for Control System Design,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, FL, Vol. 5, pp. 4578–4585. [CrossRef]
Han, J., 2009, “From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 56(3), pp. 900–906. [CrossRef]
Gao, Z., 2006, “Active Disturbance Rejection Control: A Paradigm Shift in Feedback Control System Design,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN, June 14–16, Vol. 2, pp. 399–405. [CrossRef]
Zheng, Q., Chen, Z., and Gao, Z., 2009, “A Practical Approach to Disturbance Decoupling Control,” Control Eng. Pract., 17(9), pp. 1016–1025. [CrossRef]
Piazzesi, G., Devadas, M., Krocher, O., Elsener, M., and Wokaun, A., 2006, “Isocyanic Acid Hydrolysis Over Fe-ZAM5 in Urea SCR,” Catal. Commun., 7(8), pp. 600–603. [CrossRef]
Kim, J. Y., Ryu, S. H., and Ha, J. S., 2004, “Numerical Prediction on the Characteristics of Spray-Induced Mixing and Thermal Decomposition of Urea Solution in SCR System,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2004-0889. [CrossRef]
Strots, V. O., Santhanam, S., Adelman, B. J., Griffin, G. A., and Derybowski, E. M., 2009, “Deposit Formation in Urea-SCR Systems,” SAE World Congress, SAE Technical Paper No. 2009-01-2780. [CrossRef]
Schaber, P., Colson, J., Higgins, S., Thielen, D., Anspach, B., and Brauer, J., 2004, “Thermal Decomposition (Pyrolysis) of Urea in an Open Reaction Vessel,” Thermochim. Acta, 424(1–2), pp. 131–142. [CrossRef]
Yim, S. D., Kim, S. J., Baik, J. H., Nam, I., Mok, Y. S., Lee, J. H., Cho, B. K., and Oh, S. H., 2004, “Decomposition of Urea Into NH3 for the SCR Process,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(16), pp. 4856–4862. [CrossRef]
Chatterjee, D., Burkhardt, T., Webel, M., Nova, I., Grossale, A., and Tronconi, E., 2007, “Numerical Simulation of Zeolite- and V-Based SCR Catalyst Converters,” SAE World Congress, SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-1136. [CrossRef]
Grossale, A., Nova, I., and Tronconi, E., 2008, “Study of a Fe-Zeolite-Based System as NH3-SCR Catalyst for Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment,” Catal. Today, 136(1–2), pp. 18–27. [CrossRef]
Upadhyay, D., and Nieuwstadt, M. V., 2002, “Modeling of a Urea SCR Catalyst With Automotive Applications,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2002-32104. [CrossRef]
Grossale, A., Nova, I., Tronconi, E., Chatterjee, D., and Weibel, M., 2008, “The Chemistry of Reaction Analysis,” J. Catal., 256(2), pp. 312–322. [CrossRef]
Upadhyay, D., and Nieuwstadt, M. V., 2006, “Model Based Analysis and Control Design of a Urea-SCR DeNOx Aftertreatment System,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 128(3), pp. 737–741. [CrossRef]
Schär, C. M., Onder, C. H., Elsener, M., and Geering, H. P., 2004, “Model-Based Control of an SCR System for a Mobile Application,” SAE World Congress, SAE Technical Paper No. 2004-05-0412.
Hunnekes, E. V., Heijden, P., and Patchett, J. A., 2006, “Ammonia Oxidation Catalysts for Mobile SCR System,” SAE World Congress, SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-0640. [CrossRef]
Hsieh, M.-F., and Wang, J., 2011, “A Two-Cell Backstepping-Based Control Strategy for Diesel Engine Selective Catalystic Reduction Systems,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 19(6), pp. 1504–1515. [CrossRef]
Gao, Z., 2003, “Scaling and Bandwidth-Parameterization Based Controller Tuning,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, CO, June 4–6, pp. 4989–4996.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Urea base SCR system for diesel engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

ADRC combined with a switch controller

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

ADRC controller design for SCR system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The variation of the ammonia surface storage ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The ammonia input and downstream ammonia of the SCR system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The variation of the ammonia surface storage ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The conditions before and after the input hits zero

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

NOx reduction of compound control strategy when engine on steady state

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The speed tracking in the FTP-75 test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The light-duty vehicle model built in GT-Power

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The temperature out of the engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The mole fraction of the NO and NO2 at upstream of the SCR system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The flow mass rate of the exhaust gas out of engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Ammonia input and output of compound control strategy when engine on steady state

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

NOx reduction after SCR system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Ammonia input at the upstream of SCR system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Comparison between compound control and feed-forward control

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Ammonia slip of urea injection inaccuracy and ammonia storage decrease due to aging

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

SCR-out NOx of urea injection inaccuracy and ammonia storage decrease due to aging

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Ammonia slip after SCR system

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In