Technical Brief

On the Energetics of a Mechatronic Elevator System

[+] Author and Article Information
Kun-Yung Chen

Assistant Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Air Force Institute of Technology,
No. 198, Jieshou West Road, Gangshan District,
Kaohsiung City 820, Taiwan
e-mail: u9615906@nkfust.edu.tw

Rong-Fong Fung

Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering,
National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology,
No. 1, University Road, Yanchao District,
Kaohsiung City 824, Taiwan
e-mail: rffung@nkfust.edu.tw

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received March 10, 2014; final manuscript received March 13, 2015; published online April 17, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Junmin Wang.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 137(8), 084501 (Aug 01, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: DS-14-1109; doi: 10.1115/1.4030063 History: Received March 10, 2014; Revised March 13, 2015; Online April 17, 2015

The energy balance equation consisting of mechanical and electrical parts of a mechatronic elevator system is studied in this paper. The total input energy is equal to the mechanical and electrical energies, where a weighting factor should be added for the mechatronic system. The calculus of variation is implemented to find the minimum input electrical energy control (MIEEC) and minimum dissipation energy control (MDEC), which are compared and found to have the same results. From numerical simulations, it is confirmed to demonstrate that the energy balance equation must contain a weighting factor in a mechatronic system.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Motor drive system: (a) block diagram of a PMSM control system and (b) gear speed-reducer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Physical model of the mechatronic elevator system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Numerical responses of the mechatronic elevator system by the MIEEC method between cases 1 and 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparisons of the total input, dissipation, and storage energies between cases 1 and 2




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In