0
Research Papers

A Framework for Control of Robots With Energy Regeneration

[+] Author and Article Information
Hanz Richter

Associate Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Cleveland State University,
Cleveland, OH 44115
e-mail: h.richter@csuohio.edu

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received February 24, 2014; final manuscript received April 6, 2015; published online June 2, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Heikki Handroos.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 137(9), 091004 (Sep 01, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: DS-14-1090; doi: 10.1115/1.4030391 History: Received February 24, 2014; Revised April 06, 2015; Online June 02, 2015

This paper focuses on robot control problems where energy regeneration is an explicit consideration, and it proposes a methodology for modeling and control design of regenerative motion control systems. The generic model consists of a robotic manipulator where some joints are actively controlled and the remaining joints are energetically self-contained and semi-actively controlled. The model can capture various electromechanical and hydraulic actuator configurations for industrial robots and powered human-assist devices. The basic control approach consists of three steps. First, a virtual control design is conducted by any suitable means. Then, virtual control inputs are enacted by a matching law for the adjustable parameters of the semi-active joints. Finally, the energy storage dynamics are adjusted using design parameters and an optional outer supervisory loop. The method has several attractive features: design simplicity, amenability to simultaneous plant and control design optimization, explicit treatment of energy regeneration, and applicability to multiple domains. This paper emphasizes electromechanical robots whose semi-active joints use ultracapacitors as the single energy storage medium. An internal energy balance equation and associated ideal self-powered operation (ISPO) condition are given for the semi-active joints. This condition is a structural characteristic of the system and independent of the control law. Extensions to handle higher-order dynamics are presented. Also, it is shown that discrepancies between virtual and actual controls can be mapped to parametric uncertainty in the virtual design. Experimental results confirm the validity of the approach.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Karnopp, D., Margolis, D., and Rosenberg, R., 2012, System Dynamics: Modeling, Simulation, and Control of Mechatronic Systems, 5th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. [CrossRef]
Hunter, B., 1981, “Design of a Self-Contained Active, Regenerative, Computer-Controlled Above-Knee Prosthesis,” Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Seth, B., 1987, “Energy Regeneration and Its Application to Active Above-Knee Prostheses,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Tabor, K., 1988, “The Real-Time Digital Control of a Regenerative Above-Knee Prosthesis,” Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Tucker, M., and Fite, K., 2010, “Mechanical Damping With Electrical Regeneration for a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis,” IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 6–9, pp. 13–18. [CrossRef]
Blumentritt, S., Scherer, H., Michael, J., and Schmalz, T., 1998, “Transfemoral Amputees Walking on a Rotary Hydraulic Prosthetic Knee Mechanism: A Preliminary Report,” J. Prosthet. Orthotics, 10(3), pp. 61–70. [CrossRef]
van den Bogert, A., Samorezov, S., Davis, B., and Smith, W., 2012, “Modeling and Optimal Control of an Energy-Storing Prosthetic Knee,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 134(5), p. 051007. [CrossRef]
Hitt, J., Sugar, T., Holgate, M., Bellman, R., and Hollander, K., 2009, “Robotic Transtibial Prosthesis With Biomechanical Energy Regeneration,” Ind. Rob., 36(5), pp. 441–447. [CrossRef]
Martinez-Villalpando, E., and Herr, H., 2009, “Agonist–Antagonist Active Knee Prosthesis: A Preliminary Study in Level-Ground Walking,” J. Rehab. Res. Dev., 46(3), pp. 361–373. [CrossRef]
Rankis, I., Meike, D., and Senfelds, A., 2013, “Utilization of Regeneration Energy in Industrial Robots System,” Power Electr. Eng., 31, pp. 95–100.
Ho, H., and Ahn, K., 2012, “Design and Control of a Closed-Loop Hydraulic Energy-Regenerative System,” Autom. Constr., 22, pp. 444–458. [CrossRef]
Seth, B., and Flowers, W., 1990, “Generalized Actuator Concept for the Study of the Efficiency of Energetic Systems,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 112(2), pp. 233–238. [CrossRef]
Nakano, K., Suda, Y., and Nakadai, S., 2003, “Self-Powered Active Vibration Control Using a Single Electric Actuator,” J. Sound Vib., 260(2), pp. 213–235. [CrossRef]
Izumi, T., 2000, “Energy Saving Manipulator by Regenerating Conservative Energy,” Advanced Motion Control Symposium, Nagoya, Japan, Apr. 1, pp. 630–635. [CrossRef]
Izumi, T., Boyagoda, P., Nakaoka, M., and Hiraki, E., 1995, “Optimal Control of a Servo System Regenerating Conservative Energy to a Condenser,” Proceedings of the IEEE/IAS Conference on Industrial Automation and Control: Emerging Technologies, Taipei, Taiwan, May 22–27, pp. 651–656. [CrossRef]
Conway, B., 1999, Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications, Springer, New York. [CrossRef]
Shimizu, T., and Underwood, C., 2013, “Super-Capacitor Energy Storage for Micro-Satellites: Feasibility and Potential Mission Applications,” Acta Astronaut., 85, pp. 138–154. [CrossRef]
Vinot, E., and Trigui, R., 2013, “Optimal Energy Management of HEVs With Hybrid Storage System,” Energy Conv. Manage., 76, pp. 437–452. [CrossRef]
Naayagi, R., and Forsyth, A., 2010, “Bidirectional DC–DC Converter for Aircraft Electric Energy Storage Systems,” IET Conference on Power Electronics, Machines, and Drives (PEMD 2010), Brighton, UK, pp. 1–6.
Grbovic, P., Delarue, P., Le Moigne, P., and Bartholomeus, P., 2011, “Modeling and Control of the Ultracapacitor-Based Regenerative Controlled Electric Drives,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 58(8), pp. 3471–3484. [CrossRef]
Hredzak, B., Agelidis, V., and Demetriades, G., 2014, “A Low Complexity Control System for a Hybrid DC Power Source Based on Ultracapacitor-Lead Acid Battery Configuration,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 29(6), pp. 2882–2891. [CrossRef]
Kuperman, A., Aharon, I., Malki, S., and Kara, A., 2013, “Design of a Semiactive Battery-Ultracapacitor Hybrid Energy Source,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 28(2), pp. 806–815. [CrossRef]
Kannappan, S., Kaliyappan, K., Manian, R. K., Pandian, A. S., Yang, H., Lee, Y. S., Jang, J.-H., and Lu, W., 2014, “Graphene Based Supercapacitors With Improved Specific Capacitance and Fast Charging Time at High Current Density,” arXiv:1311.1548 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci].
Vael, G., Achten, P., and Zhao, F., 2004, “The Innas Hydraulic Transformer: The Key to the Hydrostatic Common Pressure Rail,” Marcel Dekker, New York.
Spong, M., Hutchinson, S., and Vidyasagar, M., 2006, Robot Modeling and Control, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Khalil, H., 2001, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Swaroop, D., Hedrick, J. K., Yip, P. P., and Gerdes, J. C., 2000, “Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 45(10), pp. 1893–1899. [CrossRef]
Johansen, T., and Fossen, T., 2013, “Control Allocation: A Survey,” Automatica, 49(5), pp. 1087–1103. [CrossRef]
Gawthrop, P., Wagg, D., Neild, S., and Wang, L., 2013, “Power-Constrained Intermittent Control,” Int. J. Control, 86(3), pp. 396–409. [CrossRef]
Brown, K., 1994, “Design and Analysis of Robots That Perform Dynamic Tasks Using Internal Body Motion,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Seok, S., Wang, A., Otten, D., and Kim, S., 2012, “Actuator Design for High Force Proprioceptive Control in Fast Legged Locomotion,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vilamoura, Oct. 7–12, pp. 1970–1975. [CrossRef]
Anderson, F., and Pandy, M., 2001, “Dynamic Optimization of Human Walking,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 123(5), pp. 381–390. [CrossRef]
Erdemir, A., McLean, S., Herzog, W., and van den Bogert, A., 2007, “Model-Based Estimation of Muscle Forces Exerted During Movements,” Clin. Biomech., 22(2), pp. 131–154. [CrossRef]
Lewis, F., Dawson, D., and Abdallah, C., 2003, “Robot Manipulator Control: Theory and Practice,” Automation and Control Engineering, Taylor & Francis, New York. [CrossRef]
Francis, B., and Wonham, W., 1975, “The Internal Model Principle for Linear Multivariable Regulators,” Appl. Math. Optim., 2(2), pp. 170–194. [CrossRef]
Richter, H., Simon, D., and van den Bogert, A., 2014, “Semiactive Virtual Control Method for Robots With Regenerative Energy-Storing Joints,” Proceedings of the 19th IFAC World Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 10244–10250.
Corke, P., and Armstrong-Helouvry, B., 1994, “A Search for Consensus Among Model Parameters Reported for the PUMA 560 Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, pp. 1608–1613.
Winter, D., 1983, “Energy Generation and Absorption at the Ankle and Knee During Fast, Natural, and Slow Cadences,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 175, pp. 147–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hogan, N., 1985, “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II—Implementation,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 107(1), pp. 8–16. [CrossRef]
Richter, H., and Selvaraj, D., 2015, “Impedance Control With Energy Regeneration in Advanced Exercise Machines,” American Control Conference, Chicago, IL.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Robotic manipulator configuration assumed throughout this work. There are n joints, of which the first n − m are fully actuated and the remaining m are semi-actuated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of active and semi-active joints. Half-arrows denote bidirectional power flow, with power following the direction of the arrow when positive.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of inline (electromechanical example) and crank–slider (hydraulic example) joints. The bond graph captures the mechanical input stage of either design.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic and bond graph of conversion, modulation, and storage elements in the electromechanical semi-active JM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Bond graph of conversion, modulation, and storage elements in the hydraulic semi-active JM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

PUMA 560 robot used in simulation studies and experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Sinewave tracking experiments: fully active and semi-active virtual control results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Sinewave tracking experiments: source power in active and semi-active approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Semi-active control with manually applied disturbance torque estimated by dynamic model inversion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Semi-active control with manually applied disturbance torque: ultracapacitor power

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In