0
Research Papers

Optimal Proportional–Integral–Derivative Control of Time-Delay Systems Using the Differential Quadrature Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Wei Dong

State Key Laboratory of
Mechanical System and Vibration,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: chengquess@sjtu.edu.cn

Ye Ding

State Key Laboratory of
Mechanical System and Vibration,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: y.ding@sjtu.edu.cn

Xiangyang Zhu

State Key Laboratory of
Mechanical System and Vibration,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: mexyzhu@sjtu.edu.cn

Han Ding

State Key Laboratory of
Mechanical System and Vibration,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: hding@sjtu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received November 24, 2014; final manuscript received June 1, 2015; published online July 14, 2015. Assoc. Editor: M. Porfiri.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 137(10), 101005 (Oct 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: DS-14-1498; doi: 10.1115/1.4030783 History: Received November 24, 2014; Revised June 01, 2015; Online July 14, 2015

This paper presents an accurate and computationally efficient time-domain design method for the proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control of first-order and second-order plants in the presence of discrete time delays. As time delays would generally deteriorate the achievable performance of the PID controllers, their effects should be thoroughly considered in the controller design and parameter tuning process. This paper is thereby motivated to propose a time-domain semi-analytical method for the parameter tuning and stability analysis of PID controllers of the time-delay systems. To facilitate this development, the transfer functions of the investigated plants associated with the PID controllers are first rewritten as linear periodic delayed differential equations (DDEs) in state-space form. Then, the differential quadrature method (DQM) is adopted to estimate the time derivative of the state-space function at each sampling grid point within a duration of the time delay by the weighted linear sum of the function values over the whole sampling grid points. In this way, the DDEs in the time-delay duration are discretized as a series of algebraic equations, and the transition matrix can be obtained by combining these discretized algebraic equations. Thereafter, the stability boundary can be determined and the optimal control gains are obtained by minimizing the largest absolute eigenvalue of the transition matrix. As the minimum problems are commonly solved by the gradient descent approaches, the analytical form of the gradient of the largest absolute eigenvalue of transition matrix with respect to the control gains is explicitly presented. Finally, extensive numeric examples are provided, and the proposed DQM is proven to be an accurate and computationally efficient way to tune the optimal control gains and estimate the stability region in the control gain space.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The contour of the maximum eigenvalues corresponding to varying KP and KI

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The three-dimensional (3D) plot of the largest absolute eigenvalue of the system (39) near the global minimum point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The response of the system (39) when with different controllers and tuning method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The stability region in 3D parametric space

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The step response of the PID controller with KI = 2.08, KP = 1.5, and KD = 0.6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The contour of the maximum eigenvalues corresponding to varying KP and KI

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The step responses of the system with control gains tuned with the semi-discretization method and the DQM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

A detailed view of the contour of the maximum eigenvalues

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In