Research Papers

Adaptive-Robust Stabilization of the Furuta's Pendulum Via Attractive Ellipsoid Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Patricio Ordaz

Research Center on Technology of
Information and Systems (CITIS),
Autonomous University of Hidalgo State,
Mineral de la Reforma Hidalgo 42074, México
e-mail: jp.ordaz.oliver@gmail.com

Alex Poznyak

Automatic Control Department,
Center for Research and
Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV),
México City 07360, México
e-mail: apoznyak@ctrl.cinvestav.mx

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received April 19, 2014; final manuscript received November 23, 2015; published online December 23, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Srinivasa M. Salapaka.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 138(2), 021005 (Dec 23, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: DS-14-1182; doi: 10.1115/1.4032130 History: Received April 19, 2014; Revised November 23, 2015

This paper focuses on the issue of adaptive-robust stabilization of the Furuta's pendulum around unstable equilibrium where the dynamical model is unknown. The control scheme lies at the lack of the dynamical model as well as external disturbances. The stabilization analysis is based on the attractive ellipsoid method (AEM) for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems having “quasi-Lipschitz” nonlinearities. Even more, a modification of the AEM concept that permits to use online information obtained during the process is suggested here. This adjustment (or adaptation) is made only in some fixed sample times, so that the corresponding gain matrix of the robust controller is given on time interval too. Furthermore, under a specific “regularized persistent excitation condition,” the proposed method guarantees that the controlled system trajectories remain inside an ellipsoid of a minimal size (the minimal size is refereed to as the minimal trace of the corresponding inverse ellipsoidal matrix). Finally, the adaptive process describes a region of attraction (ROA) of the considered system under adaptive-robust nonlinear control law.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Furuta, K. , Yamakita, M. , and Kobayashi, S. , 1992, “ Swing-Up Control of Inverted Pendulum Using Pseudo-State Feedback,” J. Syst. Control Eng., 206(6), pp. 263–269.
Iwashiro, M. , Furuta, K. , and Astrom, K. J. , 1996, “ Energy Based Control of Pendulum,” IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Dearborn, MI, Sept. 15–18, pp. 715–720.
Maalouf, D. , Moog, C. , Aoustin, Y. , and Li, S. , 2015, “ Classification of Two-Degree-of-Freedom Underactuated Mechanical Systems,” IET Control Theory Appl., 10(9), pp. 1501–1510. [CrossRef]
Fantoni, I. , and Lozano, R. , 2002, Non-Linear Control of Underactuated Mechanical Systems, Vol. 1, Springer-Verlag, London.
Ordaz, P. , Espinoza, E. , and Muñoz, F. , 2014, “ Research on Swing up Control Based on Energy for the Pendubot System,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 136(4), p. 041018. [CrossRef]
Machleidt, K. , Kroneis, J. , and Liu, S. , 2007, “ Stabilization of the Furuta Pendulum Using a Nonlinear Control Law Based on the Method of Controlled Lagrangians,” IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Vigo, Spain, June 4–7, pp. 2129–2134.
Iwase, M. , Astom, K. J. , Furuta, K. , and Akesson, J. , 2006, “ Analysis of Safe Manual Control by Using Furuta Pendulum,” International Conference on Control Applications Munich, Munich, Germany, Oct. 4–6, pp. 568–572.
Xin, X. , and Liu, Y. , 2014, Control Design and Analysis for Underactuated Robotic Systems, 1st ed., Springer-Verlag, London.
Astrom, K. J. , and Wittenmark, B. , 1994, Adaptive Control, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, New York.
Anderson, B. D. O. , 1995, “ Adaptive Systems, Lack of Persistency of Excitation and Bursting Phenomena,” Automatica, 21(3), pp. 247–258. [CrossRef]
Ioannou, P. A. , and Sun, J. , 1996, Robust Adaptive Control, Courier Corporation, Amsterdam.
Poliakov, A. , and Poznyak, A. , 2011, “ Invariant Ellipsoid Method for Minimization of Unmatched Disturbances Effects in Sliding Mode Control,” Automatica, 47(7), pp. 1450–1454. [CrossRef]
Utkin, V. , 1992, Sliding Modes in Control and Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Takeshi, T. , 1990, “ Stability Theorems of Perturbed Linear Ordinary Differential Equations,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 149(2), pp. 583–598. [CrossRef]
Ordaz, P. , Alazki, H. , and Poznyak, A. , 2013, “ Attractive Ellipsoid Method With a Sample-Time Adjusted Feedback for Robust Bounded Output Stabilization,” Kybernetika, 49(6), pp. 911–934.
Ordaz, P. , and Poznyak, A. , 2014, “ ‘KL’-Gain Adaptation for Attractive Ellipsoid Method,” IMA J. Math. Control Inf., 32(3), pp. 447–469. [CrossRef]
Ljung, L. , 1998, System Identification: Theory for the User, Birkhauser, Boston.
Poznyak, A. , 2010, Advanced Mathematical Tools for Automatic Control Engineers: Deterministic Techniques, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Mineola, NY.
Sastry, S. , and Bodson, M. , 1994, Adaptive Control: Stability, Convergence, and Robustness, Prentice-Hall, New York.
Blanchini, F. , and Miani, S. , 2007, Set-Theoretic Methods in Control, Springer Science and Business Media, Boston, Basel, Berlin.
Haddad, W. M. , and Chellaboina, V. , 2008, Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Control: A Lyapunov-Based Approach, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Bose, N. , and Li, C. , 1968, “ A Quadratic Form Representation of Polynomials of Several Variables and Its Applications,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 13(4), pp. 447–448. [CrossRef]
Hachicho, O. , and Tibken, B. , 2002, “ Estimating Domains of Attraction of a Class of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems With LMI Methods Based on the Theory of Moments,” 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, NV, Dec. 10–13, Vol. 3, pp. 3150–3155.
Levin, A. , 1994, “ An Analytical Method of Estimating the Domain of Attraction for Polynomial Differential Equations,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 39(12), pp. 2471–2475. [CrossRef]
Topcu, U. , Packard, A. , Seiler, P. , and Balas, G. , 2009, “ Robust Region-of-Attraction Estimation,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 55(1), pp. 137–142. [CrossRef]
Cruck, E. , Moitie, R. , and Suebe, N. , 2001, “ Estimation of Basins of Attraction for Uncertain Systems With Affine and Lipschitz Dynamics,” Dyn. Control, 11(3), pp. 211–227. [CrossRef]
Hu, T. , and Lin, Z. , 2003, “ Composite Quadratic Lyapunov Functions for Constrained Control Systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 48(3), pp. 440–450. [CrossRef]
Peaucelle, D. , Henrion, D. , Labit, Y. , and Taitz, K. , 2002, User's Guide for SeDuMi Interface 1.04.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Furuta's pendulum system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The class C(A,δ1,δ2) of quasi-Lipschitz functions (scalar case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Invariant ellipsoids Eti corresponding to trajectories x2(t) versus x4(t)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

System position x1 and x2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

System velocity x3 and x4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Invariant ellipsoids Eti corresponding to trajectories x1(t) versus x3(t)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In