0
Research Papers

Linearized J2 and Atmospheric Drag Model for Control of Inner-Formation Satellite System in Elliptical Orbits

[+] Author and Article Information
Lu Cao

The State Key Laboratory
of Astronautic Dynamics,
China Xi'an Satellite Control Center,
Xi'an 710043, China
e-mail: lu.cao2@mail.mcgill.ca

Hengnian Li

The State Key Laboratory
of Astronautic Dynamics,
China Xi'an Satellite Control Center,
Xi'an 710043, China
e-mail: Henry_xscc@aliyun.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received April 6, 2015; final manuscript received January 18, 2016; published online March 9, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Ming Xin.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 138(5), 051004 (Mar 09, 2016) (15 pages) Paper No: DS-15-1158; doi: 10.1115/1.4032745 History: Received April 06, 2015; Revised January 18, 2016

A new set of linearized differential equations governing relative motion of inner-formation satellite system (IFSS) is derived with the effects of J2 as well as atmospheric drag. The IFSS consists of the “inner satellite” and the “outer satellite,” this special configuration formation endows its some advantages to map the gravity field of earth. For long-term IFSS in elliptical orbit, the high-fidelity set of linearized equations is more convenient than the nonlinear equations for designing formation control system or navigation algorithms. In addition, to avoid the collision between the inner satellite and the outer satellite, the minimum sliding mode error feedback control (MSMEFC) is adopted to perform a real-time control on the outer satellite in the presence of uncertain perturbations from the system and space. The robustness and steady-state error of MSMEFC are also discussed to show its theoretical advantages than traditional sliding mode control (SMC). Finally, numerical simulations are performed to check the fidelity of the proposed equations. Moreover, the efficacy of the MSMEFC is performed to control the IFSS with high precision.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Neeck, S. P. , Magner, T. J. , and Paules, G. E. , 2005, “ NASA's Small Satellite Missions for Earth Observation,” Acta Astronaut., 56(1–2), pp. 187–192. [CrossRef]
Folta, D. , Bristow, J. , Hawkins, A. , and Dell, G. , 2002, “ NASA's Autonomous Formation Flying Technology Demonstration, Earth Observing-1,” First International Symposium on Formation Flying Missions and Technologies, Center National d'Etudes Spatiales, Paris, pp. 29–30.
Cabeza, I. , and Maetinez, A. , 2002, “ Smart-2: An ESA Mission to Demonstrate the Key Technologies for Formation Flying and Drag-Free Control,” 1st International Symposium on Formation Flying Missions and Technologies, Center National d'Etudes Spatiales, Paris, pp. 29–30.
Alfriend, K. T. , Vadali, S. R. , Gurfil, P. , How, J. P. , and Breger, L. S. , 2010, Spacecraft Formation Flying: Dynamics, Control and Navigation, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
Kristiansen, R. , and Nicklasson, P. J. , 2009, “ Spacecraft Formation Flying: A Review and New Results on State Feedback Control,” Acta Astronaut., 65(11), pp. 1537–1552. [CrossRef]
Bauer, F. , Bristow, J. , Carpenter, J. , Garrison, J. , Hartman, K. , Lee, T. , Long, A. , Kelbel, D. , Lu, V. , How, J. , Busse, F. , Axelrad, P. , and Moreau, M. , 2001, “ Enabling Spacecraft Formation Flying in Any Earth Orbit Through Spaceborne GPS and Enhanced Autonomy Technologies,” Space Technol., 20(4), pp. 175–185.
Wei, C. Z. , Park, S. Y. , and Park, C. , 2013, “ Linearized Dynamics Model for Relative Motion Under a J2-Perturbed Elliptical Reference Orbit,” Int. J. Nonlinear Mech., 55, pp. 55–69. [CrossRef]
Cabeza, I. , and Maetinez, A. , 2002, “ Smart-2: An ESA Mission to Demonstrate the Key Technologies for Formation Flying and Drag-Free Control,” 1st International Symposium on Formation Flying Missions and Technologies, Center National d'Etudes Spatiales, Paris, pp. 29–30.
Neeck, S. P. , Magner, T. J. , and Paules, G. E. , 2005, “ NASA's Small Satellite Missions for Earth Observation,” Acta Astronaut., 56(1–2), pp. 187–192. [CrossRef]
Kristiansen, R. , and Nicklasson, P. J. , 2009, “ Spacecraft Formation Flying: A Review and New Results on State Feedback Control,” Acta Astronaut., 65(11–12), pp. 1537–1552. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. L. , Zeng, G. Q. , Wang, Z. K. , and Li, L. , 2008, Theory and Application of Distributed Satellite, Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese).
Lange, B. , 1964, “ The Drag-Free Satellite,” AIAA J., 2(9), pp. 1590–1606. [CrossRef]
Wang, Z. K. , and Zhang, Y. L. , 2008, “ A Novel Concept of Satellite Gravity Field Measurement System Using Precision Formation Flying Technology,” 3rd CSA-IAA Conference on Advanced Space Systems and Applications-Satellite Applications and Applied Satellites, IEEE, New York, p. 58.
Wang, Z. K. , and Zhang, Y. L. , 2010, “ Acquirement of Pure Gravity Orbit Using Precision Formation Flying Technology,” 6th International Workshop on Satellite Constellation and Formation Flying, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 124–128.
Seeber, G. , 2003, Satellite Geodesy, 2nd ed., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, NY.
Dang, Z. H. , and Zhang, Y. L. , 2012, “ Formation Control Using μ-synthesis for Inner-Formation Gravity Measurement Satellite System,” Adv. Space Res., 49(10), pp. 1487–1505. [CrossRef]
Dang, Z. H. , and Zhang, Y. L. , 2011, “ Relative Position and Attitude Estimation for Inner-Formation Gravity Measurement Satellite System,” Acta Astronaut., 69, pp. 514–525. [CrossRef]
Schweigart, S. A. , and Sedwick, R. J. , 2002, “ High-Fidelity Linearized J2 Model for Satellite Formation Flight,” J. Guid., Control Dyn., 25(6), pp. 1073–1080. [CrossRef]
Carter, T. , and Humi, M. , 2002, “ Rendezvous Equations in a Central-Force Field With Linear Drag,” J. Guid., Control Dyn., 25(1), pp. 74–79. [CrossRef]
Carter, T. , and Humi, M. , 2002, “ Clohessy–Wiltshire Equations Modified to Include Quadratic Drag,” J. Guid., Control Dyn., 25(6), pp. 1595–1607. [CrossRef]
Roberts, J. A. , and Roberts, P. C. E. , 2004, “ The Development of High Fidelity Linearized J2 Models for Satellite Formation Flying Control,” American Astronautical Society, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK, AAS Paper No. 04-162.
Sengupta, P. , and Vadali, S. R. , 2007, “ Relative Motion and the Geometry of Formation in Keplerian Elliptic Orbits,” J. Guid., Control Dyn., 30(4), pp. 953–964. [CrossRef]
Mishne, D. , 2004, “ Formation Control of Satellites Subject to Drag Variations and J2 Perturbations,” J. Guid., Control Dyn., 27(4), pp. 685–692. [CrossRef]
Morgan, D. , and Chung, S. , 2012, “ Swarm-Keeping Strategies for Spacecraft under J2 and Atmospheric Drag Perturbations,” J. Guid., Control Dyn., 35(5), pp. 1492–1505. [CrossRef]
Schaub, H. , and Junkins, L. , 2003, Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Cao, L. , and Misra, A. K. , 2015, “ Linearized J2 and Atmospheric Drag Model for Satellite Relative Motion With Small Eccentricity,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G, 229(4), pp. 2718–2736. [CrossRef]
Vallado, D. A. , 2001, Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, 3rd ed., Microcosm Press, Hawthorne, CA.
Cao, L. , Li, X. L. , Chen, X. Q. , and Zhao, Y. , 2014, “ Minimum Sliding Mode Error Feedback Control for Fault Tolerant Small Satellite Attitude Control,” Adv. Space Res., 53(2), pp. 309–324. [CrossRef]
Cao, L. , and Chen, X. Q. , 2015, “ Minimum Sliding Mode Error Feedback Control and Observer for Satellite Attitude Control and Determination,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G, 229(12), pp. 2242–2257. [CrossRef]
Sabatini, M. , and Palmerini, G. B. , 2008, “ Linearized Formation-Flying Dynamics in a Perturbed Orbital Environment,” IEEE Aerospace Conference.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of inner–outer formation system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Relative motion J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–10 orbits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Relative motion in three directions J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–10 orbits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relative motion J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–10 orbits—different initial conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relative motion errors J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–2 orbits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relative motion sliding mode and control force J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–2 orbits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Equivalent control error and estimated perturbations J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–2 orbits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Relative motion errors for serious case J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–2 orbits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Relative motion sliding mode and control force for serious case J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–2 orbits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Equivalent control error and estimated perturbations for serious case J2 and atmospheric drag e = 0.01–2 orbits

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In