0
Technical Brief

Fixed-Order Decoupling of Interval Plant Families

[+] Author and Article Information
Mostafa Negim

Department of Electrical Engineering,
Sharif University of Technology,
Tehran 11365-9363, Iran
e-mail: negim@ee.sharif.edu

Amin Nobakhti

Department of Electrical Engineering,
Sharif University of Technology,
Tehran 11365-9363, Iran
e-mail: nobakhti@sharif.edu

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received June 14, 2015; final manuscript received August 27, 2016; published online October 17, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Ryozo Nagamune.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 139(1), 014502 (Oct 17, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: DS-15-1270; doi: 10.1115/1.4034747 History: Received June 14, 2015; Revised August 27, 2016

A method for the reduction of interactions in linear time invariant (LTI) multivariable uncertain systems is proposed. An H-norm metric is proposed for the assessment of interactions in interval uncertain multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) plants. Based on this, a procedure for the design of fixed-order dynamic decoupling precompensators for MIMO plants with interval uncertainty is outlined which can be solved using efficient solvers such as cvx. The proposed methodology is used to develop a low-order robust multivariable controller for voltage and frequency control of an islanded distributed generation (DG) unit.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Rosenbrock, H. , 1974, Computer Aided Control System Design, Academic Press, London.
Maciejoski, L. , 1989, Multivariable Feedback Design, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.
Firouzbahrami, M. , and Nobakhti, A. , 2012, “ Norm-Bounded Integrity Conditions of Uncertain Multivariable Linear Time-Invariant Systems Under Decentralized Control With Integral Action,” J. Process Control, 22(2), pp. 463–469. [CrossRef]
Hawkins, D. , 1972, “ Pseudodiagonalisation and the Inverse Nyquist Array Method,” Proc. IEE, 119(3), pp. 337–342.
Kouvaritakis, B. , 1974, “ Characteristic Locus Methods for Multivariable Feedback System Design,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Leininger, G. , 1979, “ Diagonal Dominance for Multivariable Nyquist Array Methods Using Function Minimisation,” Automatica, 15(3), pp. 339–345. [CrossRef]
Nobakhti, A. , Munro, N. , and Porter, B. , 2003, “ Evolutionary Achievement of Diagonal Dominance in Linear Multivariable Plants,” Electron. Lett., 39(1), pp. 165–166. [CrossRef]
Chughtai, S. , and Munro, N. , 2004, “ Diagonal Dominance Using LMIs,” IEE Proc. - Control Theory Appl., 151(2), pp. 225–233.
Nobakhti, A. , and Wang, H. , 2006, “ On a New Method for H2-Based Decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 51(12), pp. 1956–1961. [CrossRef]
Nobakhti, A. , 2010, “ Conditions for Static Precompensation,” Electron. Lett., 46(24), pp. 1598–1600. [CrossRef]
Chughtai, S. , Nobakhti, A. , and Wang, H. , 2005, “ A Systematic Approach to the Design of Robust Diagonal Dominance Based MIMO Controllers,” 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 6875–6880.
Chughtai, S. , and Wang, H. , 2007, “ A High-Integrity Multivariable Robust Control With Application to a Process Control Rig,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 15(4), pp. 775–785. [CrossRef]
Babazadeh, M. , and Nobakhti, A. , 2016, “ Synthesis of Sparse Dynamic Structures Via Semi-Definite Programming,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 24(3), pp. 1028–1035. [CrossRef]
Van Diggelen, F. , and Glover, K. , 1994, “ A Hadamard Weighted Loop Shaping Design Procedure for Robust Decoupling,” Automatica, 30(5), pp. 831–845. [CrossRef]
Shamgah, L. , and Nobakhti, A. , 2012, “ Decomposition Via QP,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 20(6), pp. 1630–1637. [CrossRef]
Barmish, B. , 1994, New Tools for Robustness of Linear Systems, 1st ed., Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
Rosenbrock, H. , 1970, State Space and Multivariable Theory, Nelson, London.
Bartlett, A. C. , Tesi, A. , and Vicino, A. , 1993, “ Frequency Response of Uncertain System With Interval Plant,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 38(6), pp. 929–933. [CrossRef]
Santis, E. D. , and Vicino, A. , 1996, “ Diagonal Dominance for Robust Stability of MIMO Interval Systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 41(6), pp. 871–875. [CrossRef]
Bhattacharyya, S. , Chapellat, H. , and Keel, L. , 1995, Robust Control: The Parametric Approach, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Boyd, S. , and Vandenberghe, L. , 2004, Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Grant, M. C. , and Boyd, S. P. , 2013, “ The CVX Users' Guide Release 2.0 (beta),” CVX Research, Stanford, CA.
Shamgah, L. , Nejati, A. , Nobakhti, A. , and Karimi, H. , 2011, “ Design of Low Order Dynamic Pre-Compensators Using Convex Methods,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Fransisco, CA, June 29–July 1, pp. 3680–3685.
Karimi, H. , Nikkhajoei, H. , and Iravani, M. , 2008, “ Control of an Electronically-Coupled Distributed Resource Unit Subsequent to an Islanding Event,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, 23(1), pp. 493–501. [CrossRef]
Nejati, A. , Nobakhti, A. , and Karimi, H. , 2011, “ Multivariable Control Strategy for Autonomous Operation of a Converter-Based Distributed Generation System,” IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exhibition, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 1–8.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Independent step response for DG compensated system in nominal resistance R = 76 Ω. QP is designed for R = 760 Ω.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Independent step response for DG compensated system in nominal resistance R = 76 Ω. QP is designed for R = 76 Ω.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dependent step response for DG compensated system in nominal resistance R = 76 Ω. QP is designed for R = 760 Ω.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

RCDDR for uncompensated DG-R = [76, 760] Ω

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

RCDDR for compensated DG-R = [76, 760] Ω. QP designed for R = 760 (col1 = V and col2 = f).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

RCDDR for R = [76, 760] Ω and ω for first column (DG system)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

RCDDR for R = [76, 760] Ω and ω for second column (DG system)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In