0
Research Papers

Modeling of Oscillating Control Surfaces Using Overset-Grid-Based Navier–Stokes Equations Solver

[+] Author and Article Information
Guru P. Guruswamy

Computational Physics Branch,
NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division,
Ames Research Center,
Moffett Field, CA 94035
e-mail: guru.p.guruswamy@nasa.gov

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received January 15, 2016; final manuscript received September 28, 2016; published online January 10, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Ming Xin.This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 139(3), 031005 (Jan 10, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: DS-16-1030; doi: 10.1115/1.4034945 History: Received January 15, 2016; Revised September 28, 2016

A modular procedure is presented to simulate moving control surfaces within an overset grid environment using the Navier–Stokes equations. Gaps are modeled by locally shearing the wing grids instead of using separate grids to model gaps. Grid movements for control surfaces are defined through a separate module, which is driven by an external grid generation tool. Results are demonstrated for a wing with a part-span control surface. Grids for the test case are determined from detailed grid sensitivity studies based on both nonoscillating and oscillating cases. Steady and, for the first time, unsteady pressures from overset grid computations are validated with wind tunnel data. This paper addresses the current needs of high-fidelity flow modeling to design advanced active-controls.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Typical sheared grid for part-span control surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of the wind tunnel model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Grid topology-near body and a portion of box grid, (b) near-body wing and cap grids, and (c) grid at gap

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Convergence residual at M = 0.77, α = 4.0, δ0 = 5.0 deg, and Re_c = 3.82 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Convergence steady for Cl, Cm, and Cd at M = 0.77, α = 4.0, δ0 = 5.0 deg, and Re_c = 3.82 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of normal spacing at surface on Cl, Cm, and Cd at M = 0.77, α = 4.0 deg, and δ0 = 5.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of normal grid SF on Cl, Cm, and Cd at M = 0.77, α = 4.0, and δ0 = 5.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effects of chordwise spacing on Cl, Cm, and Cd at M = 0.77, α = 4.0, and δ0 = 5.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effect of outer boundary location spacing on Cl, Cm, and Cd at M = 0.77, α = 4.0, δ0 = 5.0 deg, and Re_c = 3.82 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Response of unsteady Cl, Cm, and Cd at M = 0.77, α = 4.0 deg, δ0 = 0.0 deg, δβ = 5.0 deg, k = 0.22, and Re_c = 3.82 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effect of number of Newton subiterations on magnitude and phase angles of unsteady Cl for M = 0.77, α = 4.0 deg, δ0 = 0.0 deg, δβ = 5.0 deg, k = 0.22, and Re_c = 3.82 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effect of outer boundary location on magnitude and phase angles of unsteady Cl for M = 0.77, α = 4.0 deg, δ0 = 0.0 deg, δβ = 5.0 deg, k = 0.22, and Re_c = 3.82 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison between computed and measured steady Cp for M = 0.77, α = 0.0, and δ0 = 5.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison between computed and measured values of steady Cp for M = 0.77, α = 4.0, δ0 = 5.0 deg, and Re_c = 3.83 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Comparison between computed and measured values of in-phase and out-of-phase components of upper-surface oscillatory pressures for M = 0.77, α = 0.0 deg, k = 0.1083, δ0 = 0.0, δβ = 2.0 deg, and Re_c = 3.96 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison between computed and measured values of in-phase and out-of-phase components of upper-surface oscillatory pressures for M = 0.77, α = 4.01 deg, k = 0.2166, δ0 = 0.0, δβ = 3.86 deg, and Re_c = 3.86 × 106

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Snapshots at the peak control-surface amplitude for M = 0.77, α = 4.01 deg, k = 0.2166, δ0 = 0.0, δβ = 3.86 deg, and Re_c = 3.86 × 106. (a) Surface pressure, (b) spanwise velocity contours at control surface, and (c) chordwise density contours at midspan of control surface.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In