0
Research Papers

Adaptive and Nonlinear Control of Discharge Pressure for Variable Displacement Axial Piston Pumps

[+] Author and Article Information
Janne Koivumäki

Laboratory of Automation and Hydraulics (AUT),
Tampere University of Technology (TUT),
Korkeakoulunkatu 6,
Tampere 33720, Finland
e-mail: janne.koivumaki@tut.fi

Jouni Mattila

Laboratory of Automation and Hydraulics (AUT),
Tampere University of Technology (TUT),
Korkeakoulunkatu 6,
Tampere 33720, Finland
e-mail: jouni.mattila@tut.fi

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received April 14, 2016; final manuscript received March 9, 2017; published online June 28, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Yongchun Fang.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 139(10), 101008 (Jun 28, 2017) (16 pages) Paper No: DS-16-1188; doi: 10.1115/1.4036537 History: Received June 11, 2016; Revised March 23, 2017

This paper proposes, for the first time without using any linearization or order reduction, an adaptive and model-based discharge pressure control design for the variable displacement axial piston pumps (VDAPPs), whose dynamical behaviors are highly nonlinear and can be described by a fourth-order differential equation. The rigorous stability proof, with an asymptotic convergence, is given for the entire system. In the proposed novel controller design method, the specifically designed stabilizing terms constitute an essential core to cancel out all the stability-preventing terms. The experimental results reveal that rapid parameter adaptation significantly improves the feedback signal tracking precision compared to a known-parameter controller design. In the comparative experiments, the adaptive controller design demonstrates the state-of-the-art discharge pressure control performance, enabling a possibility for energy consumption reductions in hydraulic systems driven with VDAPP.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Mattila, J. , Koivumäki, J. , Caldwell, D. , and Semini, C. , 2017, “ A Survey on Control of Hydraulic Robotic Manipulators With Projection to Future Trends,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 22(2), pp. 669–680. [CrossRef]
Zeiger, G. , and Akers, A. , 1985, “ Torque on the Swashplate of an Axial Piston Pump,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 107(3), pp. 220–226. [CrossRef]
Zeiger, G. , and Akers, A. , 1986, “ Dynamic Analysis of an Axial Piston Pump Swashplate Control,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 200(1), pp. 49–58. [CrossRef]
Kim, S. , Cho, H. , and Lee, C. , 1987, “ A Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for the Dynamic Model of a Variable Displacement Axial Piston Pump,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 201(4), pp. 235–243. [CrossRef]
Schoenau, G. , Burton, R. , and Kavanagh, G. , 1990, “ Dynamic Analysis of a Variable Displacement Pump,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 112(1), pp. 122–132. [CrossRef]
Manring, N. , and Johnson, R. , 1994, “ Swivel Torque Within a Variable-Displacement Pump,” 46th National Conference on Fluid Power, Anaheim, CA, Mar. 23–24, pp. 13–24. http://www.nfpa.com/tech_papers/1994/94-1_3.pdf
Manring, N. , and Johnson, R. , 1996, “ Modeling and Designing a Variable-Displacement Open-Loop Pump,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 118(2), pp. 267–271. [CrossRef]
Manring, N. , 1998, “ The Torque on the Input Shaft of an Axial-Piston Swash-Plate Type Hydrostatic Pump,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 120(1), pp. 57–62. [CrossRef]
Manring, N. , and Damtew, F. , 2001, “ The Control Torque on the Swash Plate of an Axial-Piston Pump Utilizing Piston-Bore Springs,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 123(3), pp. 471–478. [CrossRef]
Kim, S. , Cho, H. , and Lee, C. , 1988, “ Stability Analysis of a Load-Sensing Hydraulic System,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 202(2), pp. 79–88. [CrossRef]
Krus, P. , 1988, “ On Load Sensing Fluid Power Systems,” Ph.D. thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Chiriboga, J. , Thein, M.-W. , and Misawa, E. , 1995, “ Input-Output Feedback Linearization Control of a Load-Sensing Hydraulic Servo System,” Fourth IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA), Albany, NY, Sept. 28–29, pp. 910–915.
Sakurai, Y. , Nakada, T. , and Tanaka, K. , 2002, “ Design Method of an Intelligent Oil-Hydraulic System (Load Sensing Oil-Hydraulic System),” IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control (ISIC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, Oct. 30, pp. 626–630.
Wu, D. , Burton, R. , Schoenau, G. , and Bitner, D. , 2002, “ Establishing Operating Points for a Linearized Model of a Load Sensing System,” Int. J. Fluid Power, 3(2), pp. 47–54. [CrossRef]
Pedersen, H. , Andersen, T. , and Hansen, M. , 2008, “ Controlling a Conventional LS-Pump Based on Electrically Measured LS-Pressure,” Bath/ASME Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Bath, UK, Sept. 10–12, pp. 541–546. http://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/controlling-a-conventional-lspump-based-on-electrically-measured-lspressure(ec97b9f0-fc2c-11dd-83f3-000ea68e967b).html
Jayaraman, G. , and Lunzman, S. , 2010, “ Parameter Estimation of an Electronic Load Sensing Pump Using the Recursive Least Squares Algorithm,” 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlanta, GA, Dec. 15–17, pp. 3445–3450.
Jayaraman, G. , and Lunzman, S. , 2011, “ Modeling and Analysis of an Electronic Load Sensing Pump,” IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA), Denver, CO, Sept. 28–30, pp. 82–87.
Lin, S. , and Akers, A. , 1990, “ Optimal Control Theory Applied to Pressure-Controlled Axial Piston Pump Design,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 112(3), pp. 475–481. [CrossRef]
Du, H. , and Manring, N. , 2001, “ A Single-Actuator Control Design for Hydraulic Variable Displacement Pumps,” American Control Conference (ACC), Arlington, VA, June 25–27, Vol. 6, pp. 4484–4489.
Grabbel, J. , and Ivantysynova, M. , 2005, “ An Investigation of Swash Plate Control Concepts for Displacement Controlled Actuators,” Int. J. Fluid Power, 6(2), pp. 19–36. [CrossRef]
Dean, P. , and Fales, R. , 2007, “ Modern Control Design for a Variable Displacement Hydraulic Pump,” American Control Conference (ACC), New York, July 9–13, pp. 3535–3540.
Kemmetmüller, W. , Fuchshumer, F. , and Kugi, A. , 2010, “ Nonlinear Pressure Control of Self-Supplied Variable Displacement Axial Piston Pumps,” Control Eng. Pract., 18(1), pp. 84–93. [CrossRef]
Guo, K. , and Wei, J. , 2013, “ Adaptive Robust Control of Variable Displacement Pumps,” American Control Conference (ACC), Washington, DC, June 17–19, pp. 1112–1117.
Wei, J. , Guo, K. , Fang, J. , and Tian, Q. , 2015, “ Nonlinear Supply Pressure Control for a Variable Displacement Axial Piston Pump,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part I, 229(7), pp. 614–624.
Zhu, W.-H. , Xi, Y.-G. , Zhang, Z.-J. , Bien, Z. , and De Schutter, J. , 1997, “ Virtual Decomposition Based Control for Generalized High Dimensional Robotic Systems With Complicated Structure,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 13(3), pp. 411–436. [CrossRef]
Zhu, W.-H. , 2010, Virtual Decomposition Control: Toward Hyper Degrees of Freedom Robots, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Slotine, J.-J. E. , and Li, W. , 1991, Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Tao, G. , 1997, “ A Simple Alternative to the Barbalat Lemma,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 42(5), p. 698. [CrossRef]
Zhu, W.-H. , and De Schutter, J. , 1999, “ Adaptive Control of Mixed Rigid/Flexible Joint Robot Manipulators Based on Virtual Decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 15(2), pp. 310–317. [CrossRef]
Zhu, W.-H. , Bien, Z. , and De Schutter, J. , 1998, “ Adaptive Motion/Force Control of Multiple Manipulators With Joint Flexibility Based on Virtual Decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 43(1), pp. 46–60. [CrossRef]
Sohl, G. A. , and Bobrow, J. E. , 1999, “ Experiments and Simulations on the Nonlinear Control of a Hydraulic Servosystem,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 7(2), pp. 238–247. [CrossRef]
Yao, B. , Bu, F. , Reedy, J. , and Chiu, G. T.-C. , 2000, “ Adaptive Robust Control of Single-Rod Hydraulic Actuators: Theory and Experiments,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 5(1), pp. 79–91. [CrossRef]
Zhu, W.-H. , and Piedboeuf, J. , 2005, “ Adaptive Output Force Tracking Control of Hydraulic Cylinders With Applications to Robot Manipulators,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 127(2), pp. 206–217. [CrossRef]
Lovrec, D. , and Ulaga, S. , 2007, “ Pressure Control in Hydraulic Systems With Variable or Constant Pumps?,” Exp. Tech., 31(2), pp. 33–41. [CrossRef]
Koivumäki, J. , Honkakorpi, J. , Vihonen, J. , and Mattila, J. , 2014, “ Hydraulic Manipulator Virtual Decomposition Control With Performance Analysis Using Low-Cost MEMS Sensors,” IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Besacon, France, July 8–11, pp. 910–917.
Harrison, A. , and Stoten, D. , 1995, “ Generalized Finite Difference Methods for Optimal Estimation of Derivatives in Real-Time Control Problems,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part I, 209(2), pp. 67–78.
Roberts, S. , 1959, “ Control Charts Based on Geometric Moving Averages,” Technometrics, 1(3), pp. 239–250. [CrossRef]
Koivumäki, J. , and Mattila, J. , 2015, “ Stability-Guaranteed Force-Sensorless Contact Force/Motion Control of Heavy-Duty Hydraulic Manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 31(4), pp. 918–935. [CrossRef]
Bonsignorio, F. , and del Pobil, A. , 2015, “ Toward Replicable and Measurable Robotics Research (From the Guest Editors),” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 22(3), pp. 32–32. [CrossRef]
Zhu, W.-H. , and Vukovich, G. , 2011, “ Virtual Decomposition Control for Modular Robot Manipulators,” IFAC. Proc. Vol., 44(1), pp. 13486–13491.
Zhu, W.-H. , Lamarche, T. , Dupuis, E. , Jameux, D. , Barnard, P. , and Liu, G. , 2013, “ Precision Control of Modular Robot Manipulators: The VDC Approach With Embedded FPGA,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 29(5), pp. 1162–1179. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Decomposed subsystems and system control setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Operating principle of the variable displacement axial piston pump

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The mapping between the controlling variable uc and the controlled variable ps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The diagram of the designed adaptive control system for the VDAPP controlling the discharge pressure. The error signals are highlighted in bold and the feedback variables are highlighted with the dashed line.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Experimental installation for the experiments. The auxiliary supply line is highlighted in blue, the fluid return line is highlighted in green, the line between the control valve and the VDAPP is highlighted in red, and the line for an additional fluid flow rate Qadd is highlighted in yellow.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The inherent oscillatory behavior of the VDAPP's discharge pressure and control piston chamber pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The known-parameter control design. The system discharge pressure tracking performance is shown in plots 1 and 2. The measured (normalized) swash plate angle is shown in plot 3. The control valve voltage (the controller output) is shown in plot 4.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The tracking performance of the system's subsidiary feedback variables p˙s, α˙, and pcp with the known-parameter control design. The reference trajectories are given in black (—) and their feedback variables are given in red ().

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The adaptive control design. The system discharge pressure tracking performance is shown in plots 1 and 2. The measured (normalized) swash plate angle is shown in plot 3. The control valve voltage (the controller output) is shown in plot 4.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The tracking performance of the system's subsidiary feedback variables p˙s, α˙, and pcp with the adaptive control design. The reference trajectories are given in black (—) and their feedback variables are given in red ().

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experiment with three fluid flow rate conditions through the system load. The first plot shows the discharge pressure trajectory, which is the same trajectory as used in Ref. [24]. The second plot shows the normalized swash plate angles αnlow, αnmed, and αnhigh in the low-, medium- and high-fluid flow rate conditions, respectively. The last plot shows the discharge pressure tracking errors eplow, epmed, and ephigh in the low-, medium- and high-flow rate conditions, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The flow map for the boundedness of the control system variables. Each bounded signal in the flow map is named with a two-part number, where the first number denotes the row number and the second number is a signal identifier (for instance, α˙∈L∞ is named with 3.1, because it lies in the third line and is the first signal in it). The main flow is highlighted in bold. In the flow map, the boundedness of a certain signal is formed from Eqs. (I1)(I5) and from the earlier bounded signals (see entries to the equations). The controller main signals are grouped with a column-based presentation (for instance, ps, p˙s, p¨s, and ps(3) lie in the same column), whereas subsidiary signals are delimited with a dashed line. Finally, the boundedness of (p˙sd−p˙s), (p¨sr−p¨s), (α¨d−α¨), and (p˙cpd−p˙cp) in Eqs. (70)(73) is delimited with a rectangle. The boundedness of the system input (uc∈L∞) is highlighted with a circle.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In