Research Papers

Design and Experimental Validation of Nonlinear Infinite-Dimensional Adaptive Observer in Automated Managed Pressure Drilling

[+] Author and Article Information
Agus Hasan

Department of Cybernetics Engineering,
Norwegian University of Science
and Technology,
Trondheim 7134, Norway
e-mail: agha@mmmi.sdu.dk

Lars Imsland

Department of Cybernetics Engineering,
Norwegian University of Science
and Technology,
Trondheim 7134, Norway
e-mail: lars.imsland@itk.ntnu.no

Espen Hauge

Research and Technology,
Statoil ASA,
Ranheim 7053, Norway
e-mail: eshau@statoil.com

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received December 12, 2016; final manuscript received March 21, 2017; published online July 20, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Davide Spinello.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 139(11), 111005 (Jul 20, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: DS-16-1595; doi: 10.1115/1.4036553 History: Received December 12, 2016; Revised March 21, 2017

Utilizing flow rate and pressure data in and out of the fluid circulation loop provides a driller with real-time trends for early detection of well-control problems that impact the drilling efficiency. Due to limited number of sensors and time delay in processing and measurements, the flow rate and pressure along the annulus and drill string need to be estimated. This paper presents state and parameter estimations for infinite-dimensional models used in automated managed pressure drilling (MPD). The objective is to monitor the key process variables associated with process safety by designing a nonlinear adaptive observer that use the available information coming from the continuous-time online process measurements at the outlet of the well. The adaptive observer consists of a copy of the infinite-dimensional model plus output injection terms where the gain is computed analytically in terms of the Bessel function of the first kind. The design is tested using field data from a drilling commissioning test by Statoil ASA, Stavanger, Norway. The results show that the nonlinear adaptive observer estimates the flow rate and pressure of the drilling fluid accurately.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kaasa, G.-O. , Stamnes, Ø. N. , Aamo, O. M. , and Imsland, L. S. , 2012, “ Simplified Hydraulics Model Used for Intelligent Estimation of Downhole Pressure for a Managed-Pressure-Drilling Control System,” SPE Drill. Completion, 27(1), pp. 127–138. [CrossRef]
Petersen, J. , Bjørkevoll, K. S. , and Lekvam, K. , 2001, “ Computing the Danger of Hydrate Formation Using a Modified Dynamic Kick Simulator,” SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Feb. 27–Mar. 1, SPE Paper No. SPE-67749-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/67749-MS
Bjørkevoll, K. S. , Anfinsen, B.-T. , Merlo, A. , Eriksen, N.-H. , and Olsen, E. , 2000, “ Analysis of Extended Reach Drilling Data Using and Advanced Pressure and Temperature Model,” SPE/IADC Asia Pacific Drilling Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Sept. 11–13, SPE Paper No. SPE-62728-MS.
Lage, A. C. V. M. , Nakagawa, E. Y. , Time, R. W. , Vefring, E. H. , and Rommetveit, R. , 1999, “ Full-Scale Experiment Study for Improved Understanding of Transient Phenomena in Underbalanced Drilling Operations,” SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mar. 9–11, SPE Paper No. SPE-52829-MS.
Rommetveit, R. , and Vefring, E. H. , 1991, “ Comparison of Results From an Advanced Gas Kick Simulator With Surface and Downhole Data From Full Scale Gas Kick Experiments in an Inclined Well,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, Oct. 6–9, SPE Paper No. SPE-22558-MS.
Hasan, A. , Hasan, A., Foss, B., Krogstad, S., Gunnerud, V., and Teixeira, A. F., 2013, “ Decision Analysis for Long-Term and Short-Term Production Optimization Applied to the Voador Field,” SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Sept. 16–18, SPE Paper No. SPE-166027-MS.
Hasan, A. , and Foss, B. , 2013, “ Optimal Wells Scheduling of a Petroleum Reservoir,” European Control Conference (ECC), Zurich, Switzerland, July 17–19, pp. 1095–1100. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6669831/
Hasan, A. , Foss, B. , and Aamo, O. M. , 2011, “ Boundary Control of Long Waves in Nonlinear Dispersive Systems,” Australian Control Conference (AUCC), Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 10–11, pp. 230–235. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6114353/
Hauge, E. , Aamo, O. M. , and Godhavn, J.-M. , 2012, “ Model-Based Estimation and Control of In/Out-Flux During Drilling,” American Control Conference (ACC), Montreal, QC, Canada, June 27–29, pp. 4909–4914.
Hauge, E. , Aamo, O. M. , and Godhavn, J.-M. , 2009, “ Model-Based Monitoring and Leak Detection in Oil and Gas Pipelines,” SPE Proj. Facil. Constr., 4(3), pp. 53–60. [CrossRef]
Hauge, E. , Aamo, O. M. , and Godhavn, J.-M. , 2013, “ Application of an Infinite-Dimensional Observer for Drilling Systems Incorporating Kick and Loss Detection,” European Control Conference (ECC), Zurich, Switzerland, July 17–19, pp. 1065–1070. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6669316/
Landet, I. S. , Pavlov, A. , and Aamo, O. M. , 2013, “ Modeling and Control of Heave-Induced Pressure Fluctuations in Managed Pressure Drilling,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 21(4), pp. 1340–1351. [CrossRef]
Hasan, A. , 2015, “ Adaptive Boundary Observer for Nonlinear Hyperbolic Systems: Design and Field Testing in Managed Pressure Drilling,” American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, IL, July 1–3, pp. 2606–2612.
Krstic, M. , and Smyshlyaev, A. , 2008, Boundary Control of PDEs, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA. [CrossRef]
Aamo, O. M. , Smyshlyaev, A. , and Krstic, M. , 2005, “ Boundary Control of the Linearized Ginzburg–Landau Model of Vortex Shedding,” SIAM J. Control Optim., 43(6), pp. 1953–1971. [CrossRef]
Krstic, M. , Guo, B.-Z. , and Smyshlyaev, A. , 2011, “ Boundary Controllers and Observers for the Linearized Schrödinger Equation,” SIAM J. Control Optim., 49(4), pp. 1479–1497. [CrossRef]
Smyshlyaev, A. , and Krstic, M. , 2005, “ Backstepping Observers for a Class of Parabolic PDEs,” Syst. Control Lett., 54(7), pp. 613–625. [CrossRef]
Vazquez, R. , and Krstic, M. , 2013, “ Marcum Q-Functions and Explicit Feedback Laws for Stabilization of Constant Coefficient 2 × 2 Linear Hyperbolic Systems,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Florence, Italy, Dec. 10–13, pp. 466–471.
Di Meglio, F. , 2011, “ Dynamics and Control of Slugging in Oil Production,” Ph.D. thesis, MINES ParisTech, Paris, France.
Hasan, A. , 2014, “ Disturbance Attenuation of n + 1 Coupled Hyperbolic PDEs,” Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Los Angeles, CA, Dec. 15–17, pp. 2058–2064.
Hasan, A. , 2014, “ Adaptive Boundary Control and Observer of Linear Hyperbolic Systems With Application to Managed Pressure Drilling,” ASME Paper No. DSCC2014-6109.
Hasan, A. , and Imsland, L. , 2014, “ Moving Horizon Estimation in Managed Pressure Drilling Using Distributed Models,” IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA), Nice, France, Oct. 8–10, pp. 605–610.
Hasan, A. , Aamo, O. M. , and Krstic, M. , 2016, “ Boundary Observer Design for Hyperbolic PDE–ODE Cascade Systems,” Automatica, 68, pp. 75–86. [CrossRef]
White, F. , 2007, Fluid Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Vazquez, R. , Krstic, M. , and Coron, J.-M. , 2011, “ Backstepping Boundary Stabilization and State Estimation of a 2 × 2 Linear Hyperbolic System,” 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC), Orlando, FL, Dec. 12–15, pp. 4937–4942.
Coron, J.-M. , Vazquez, R. , Krstic, M. , and Bastin, G. , 2013, “ Local Exponential H2 Stabilization of a 2 × 2 Quasilinear Hyperbolic System Using Backstepping,” SIAM J. Control Optim., 51(3), pp. 2005–2035. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of an automated MPD system [1]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Ullrigg test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematics of the flow-loop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The flow-loop facilities: (a) the main pump, (b) the pipes, (c) the bottom hole assembly, and (d) topside measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Loop profile in XZ-coordinate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Measured topside flow rate and pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Estimated and measured downhole pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Estimated and measured topside flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pressure estimation at different locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Estimated and measured topside flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Estimated and measured downhole pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Estimated and measured fluid loss

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Control input U(t)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Controlled downhole pressure



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In