Research Papers

A Composite Robust Fault-Tolerant Control Scheme for Limited-Thrust Spacecraft Rendezvous in Near-Circular Orbits

[+] Author and Article Information
Neng Wan

Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
University of Minnesota Duluth,
Duluth, MN 55812
e-mail: wanxx179@d.umn.edu

Weiran Yao

School of Astronautics,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Harbin 150001, China
e-mail: yaoweiran@hit.edu.cn

Mingming Shi

Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences,
University of Groningen,
Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands
e-mail: m.shi@rug.nl

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received June 16, 2016; final manuscript received May 31, 2017; published online August 28, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Ming Xin.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 139(12), 121009 (Aug 28, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: DS-16-1319; doi: 10.1115/1.4037211 History: Received June 16, 2016; Revised May 31, 2017

External perturbations and actuator faults are two practical and significant issues that deserve designers' considerations when synthesizing the controllers for spacecraft rendezvous. A composite robust fault-tolerant control (FTC) scheme that does not require the fault information is proposed in this paper for limited-thrust rendezvous in near-circular orbits. Within the control scheme, a reliable integral sliding mode (ISM) auxiliary controller and a modified guaranteed cost FTC are, respectively, developed to attenuate the external disturbances and to stabilize the nominal rendezvous system with actuator faults. Comparisons with previous works as well as a more practical and challenging simulation example are presented to verify the advantages of this composite control scheme.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Guo, S. , 2013, “Robust Reliability Based Optimal Design of H Control of Parametric Uncertain Systems,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 136(2), p. 024504. [CrossRef]
Li, X. , Yu, C. , and Gao, H. , 2015, “Frequency-Limited H Model Reduction for Positive Systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 60(4), pp. 1093–1098. [CrossRef]
Shtessel, Y. , Edwards, C. , Fridman, L. , and Levant, A. , 2014, Sliding Mode Control and Observation, Birkhäuser, New York. [CrossRef]
Yunt, K. , 2016, “Chattering-Free Error Integral Driven MIMO Sliding Mode Regulator for Linear Time-Invariant Systems,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 138(7), p. 071010. [CrossRef]
Liu, M. , Ho, D. W. C. , and Shi, P. , 2015, “Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Compensation Control for Markovian Jump Systems With Mismatched External Disturbance,” Automatica, 58, pp. 5–14. [CrossRef]
Li, H. , Shi, P. , Yao, D. , and Wu, L. , 2016, “Observer-Based Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Nonlinear Markovian Jump Systems,” Automatica, 64, pp. 133–142. [CrossRef]
Islam, S. , Liu, P. X. , and Saddik, A. E. , 2015, “Robust Control of Four-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle With Disturbance Uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 62(3), pp. 1563–1571. [CrossRef]
Sanz, R. , Garcia, P. , Zhong, Q. , and Albertos, P. , 2016, “Robust Control of Quadrotors Based on an Uncertainty and Disturbance Estimator,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 138(7), p. 071006. [CrossRef]
Yang, X. , and Gao, H. , 2013, “Robust Reliable Control for Autonomous Spacecraft Rendezvous With Limited-Thrust,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 24(1), pp. 161–168. [CrossRef]
Yang, Z. , Luo, Y. , and Zhang, J. , 2013, “Two-Level Optimization Approach for Mars Orbital Long-Duration, Large Non-Coplanar Rendezvous Phasing Maneuvers,” Adv. Space Res., 52(5), pp. 883–894. [CrossRef]
Yang, Z. , Luo, Y. , Zhang, J. , and Tang, G. , 2015, “Homotopic Perturbed Lambert Algorithm for Long-Duration Rendezvous Optimization,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 38(11), pp. 2215–2223. [CrossRef]
Li, Z. , Yang, X. , and Gao, H. , 2013, “Autonomous Impulsive Rendezvous for Spacecraft Under Orbital Uncertainty and Thruster Faults,” J. Franklin Inst., 350(9), pp. 2455–2473. [CrossRef]
Zhang, A. , Hu, Q. , and Zhang, Y. , 2015, “Observer-Based Attitude Control for Satellite Under Actuator Fault,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 38(4), pp. 806–811. [CrossRef]
Yin, S. , Xiao, B. , Ding, S. X. , and Zhou, D. , 2016, “A Review on Recent Development of Spacecraft Attitude Fault Tolerant Control System,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 63(5), pp. 3311–3320. [CrossRef]
Liu, M. , Cao, X. , and Shi, P. , 2013, “Fault Estimation and Tolerant Control for Fuzzy Stochastic Systems,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 21(2), pp. 221–229. [CrossRef]
Jia, Q. , Chen, W. , Zhang, Y. , and Chen, X. , 2015, “Fault Reconstruction and Accommodation in Linear Parameter-Varying Systems Via Learning Unknown-Input Observers,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 137(6), p. 061008. [CrossRef]
Wu, X. , and Lin, Z. , 2014, “Dynamic Anti-Windup Design in Anticipation of Actuator Saturation,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 24(2), pp. 295–312. [CrossRef]
Wang, Q. , Zhou, B. , and Duan, G. , 2015, “Robust Gain Scheduled Control of Spacecraft Rendezvous System Subject to Input Saturation,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 42, pp. 442–450. [CrossRef]
Matthews, G. P. , and DeCarlo, R. A. , 1988, “Decentralized Tracking for a Class of Interconnected Nonlinear Systems Using Variable Structure Control,” Automatica, 24(2), pp. 187–193.
Saravanakumar, R. , and Debashisha, J. , 2015, “Validation of an Integral Sliding Mode Control for Optimal Control of a Three Blade Variable Speed Variable Pitch Wind Turbine,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 69, pp. 421–429. [CrossRef]
Shen, Q. , Wang, D. , Zhu, S. , and Poh, E. K. , 2015, “Integral-Type Sliding Mode Fault-Tolerant Control for Attitude Stabilization of Spacecraft,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 23(3), pp. 1131–1138. [CrossRef]
Fridman, L. , Poznyak, A. , and Bejarano, F. J. , 2014, Robust Output LQ Optimal Control Via Integral Sliding Modes, Birkhäuser, New York. [CrossRef]
Rios, H. , Kamal, S. , Fridman, L. , and Zolghadri, A. , 2015, “Fault Tolerant Control Allocation Via Continuous Integral Sliding-Modes: A HOSM-Observer Approach,” Automatica, 51, pp. 318–325. [CrossRef]
Yu, S. , and Long, X. , 2015, “Finite-Time Consensus for Second-Order Multi-Agent Systems With Disturbances by Integral Sliding Mode,” Automatica, 54, pp. 158–165. [CrossRef]
Liu, H. , Duan, G. , and Zhang, Y. , 2006, “Robust Reliable Guaranteed Cost Control of Linear Descriptor Time-Delay Systems With Actuator Failures,” Fifth International Symposium on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC), Dalian, China, Aug. 13–16, pp. 422–427.
Li, J. , Gao, H. , Zhang, P. , and Huang, D. , 2012, “Fault Diagnosis and Optimal Fault-Tolerant Control for Systems With Delayed Measurements and States,” Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., 10(1), pp. 150–157. [CrossRef]
Xie, C. H. , and Yang, G. H. , 2016, “Approximate Guaranteed Cost Fault-Tolerant Control of Unknown Nonlinear Systems With Time-Varying Actuator Faults,” Nonlinear Dyn., 83(1–2), pp. 269–282. [CrossRef]
Wan, N. , Liu, M. , and Karimi, H. R. , 2013, “Robust Tracking Control for Rendezvous in Near-Circular Orbits,” Math. Probl. Eng., 2013, p. 726945.
Wan, N. , Liu, M. , and Karimi, H. R. , 2014, “Observer-Based Robust Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous With Thrust Saturation,” Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014, p. 710850.
Gao, X. , Teo, K. L. , and Duan, G. , 2015, “An Optimal Control Approach to Spacecraft Rendezvous on Elliptical Orbit,” Optim. Control Appl. Methods, 36(2), pp. 158–178. [CrossRef]
Yang, X. , Yu, J. , and Gao, H. , 2012, “An Impulse Control Approach to Spacecraft Autonomous Rendezvous Based on Genetic Algorithms,” Neurocomputing, 77(1), pp. 189–196. [CrossRef]
Liu, R. , Liu, M. , Sun, Z. , and Ding, J. , 2016, “Impulse Variance Control for Spacecraft Autonomous Rendezvous With an Observer-Based Approach,” IMA J. Math. Control Inf., epub.
Breger, L. , and How, J. P. , 2008, “Safe Trajectories for Autonomous Rendezvous of Spacecraft,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 31(5), pp. 1478–1489. [CrossRef]
Cairano, S. D. , Park, H. , and Kolmanovsky, I. , 2012, “Model Predictive Control Approach for Guidance of Spacecraft Rendezvous and Proximity Maneuvering,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 22(12), pp. 1398–1427. [CrossRef]
Xie, L. , and Souza, C. E. , 1990, “Robust H Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems With Norm-Bounded Uncertainty in the Input Matrix,” Syst. Control Lett., 14(5), pp. 389–396. [CrossRef]
Singla, P. , Subbarao, K. , and Junkins, J. L. , 2006, “Adaptive Output Feedback Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous and Docking Under Measurement Uncertainty,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 29(4), pp. 892–902. [CrossRef]
Khargonekar, P. P. , Petersen, I. R. , and Zhou, K. , 1990, “Robust Stabilization of Uncertain Linear System: Quadratic Stability and H Control Theory,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 35(3), pp. 356–361. [CrossRef]
Wang, S. , Wu, M. , and Jia, Z. , 2006, Matrix Inequalities, Science Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
Fehse, W. , 2003, Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft, Vol. 16, Cambridge University Press, New York. [CrossRef]
Wen, C. , Zhou, J. , Liu, Z. , and Su, H. , 2011, “Robust Adaptive Control of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in the Presence of Input Saturation and External Disturbance,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 56(7), pp. 1672–1678. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Relative Cartesian coordinate system for spacecraft rendezvous

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Hierarchy of the composite control scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Actuator efficiencies ni(t) along each axis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Spatial trajectories of different rendezvouses in the first 30,000 s: (a) fault-free rendezvous with composite controllers, (b) fault-free rendezvous with single fault-tolerant controller, and (c) faulty rendezvous with composite controllers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relative distances between spacecrafts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Switching function S(t)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

ACO and CCS of fault-tolerant controller along each axis: (a) ACO and CCS of fault-tolerant controller along x-axis, (b) ACO and CCS of fault-tolerant controller along y-axis, and (c) ACO and CCS of fault-tolerant controller along z-axis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

ACO of reliable ISM auxiliary controller along each axis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Total velocity changes Δv of faulty and fault-free rendezvouses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Performance indices J of faulty and fault-free rendezvouses




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In