0
Technical Brief

An Experimental Validation of a New Method for Multimodel Identification

[+] Author and Article Information
Anis Messaoud

Department of Electrical Engineering,
National School of Engineers of Gabes,
University of Gabes Tunisia,
Gabes 6029, Tunisia
e-mail: messaoud_anis@yahoo.fr

Ridha Ben Abdennour

Professor
Department of Electrical Engineering,
National School of Engineers of Gabes,
University of Gabes Tunisia,
Gabes 6029, Tunisia
e-mail: ridha.benabdennour@enig.rnu.tn

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received October 3, 2016; final manuscript received July 14, 2017; published online October 6, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Yang Shi.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 140(2), 024502 (Oct 06, 2017) (7 pages) Paper No: DS-16-1480; doi: 10.1115/1.4037530 History: Received October 03, 2016; Revised July 14, 2017

In this paper, we propose a new method for an optimal systematic determination of models' base for multimodel identification. This method is based on the neural classification of data set picked out on a considered nonlinear system. The obtained cluster centers are exploited to provide the weighting functions and to deduce the corresponding dispersions and their models' base. A simulation example and an experimental validation on a chemical reactor are presented to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Data set for the system identification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Weighting functions evolutions (classical choice based on the static characteristic)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Evolutions of the real and the multimodel outputs (classical technique)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Data classification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Weighting functions evolutions (proposed method)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Evolutions of the multimodel and the real outputs (proposed approach)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The chemical reactor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Identification data set

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Data classification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Evolutions of weighting functions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Evolutions of the multimodel output yMM(k) and the reactor output y(k)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The evolution of the relative error (proposed approach)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In