0
Research Papers

Multivariable Proportional-Integral-Derivative Controller Tuning Via Linear Matrix Inequalities Based on Minimizing the Nonconvexity of Linearized Bilinear Matrix Inequalities

[+] Author and Article Information
Farshad Merrikh-Bayat

Department of Electrical and
Computer Engineering,
University of Zanjan,
Zanjan 4537138791, Iran
e-mail: f.bayat@znu.ac.ir

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT,AND CONTROL. Manuscript received October 11, 2017; final manuscript received May 19, 2018; published online June 18, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Yunjun Xu.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 140(11), 111012 (Jun 18, 2018) (9 pages) Paper No: DS-17-1516; doi: 10.1115/1.4040420 History: Received October 11, 2017; Revised May 19, 2018

This paper proposes an iterative linear matrix inequality (LMI) method for tuning the parameters of multi-input multi-output (MIMO) proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controllers. The proposed method calculates the parameters of controller such that the singular values (SVs) of the sensitivity function are shaped according to the given weight function. For this purpose, first using bounded real lemma (BRL), this problem is represented as a bilinear matrix inequality (BMI) where one of the matrix variables is the variable of Lyapunov equation and the other is structured and contains the matrices of the state-space representation of the controller. This BMI is solved approximately using a novel iterative procedure which linearizes the BMI around an initial solution to arrive at an LMI. The point around which the BMI is linearized is updated automatically at each iteration and the linearized BMI has the nice property that it is obtained by minimizing the amplitude of nonconvex terms.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Åström, K. J. , and Hägglund, T. , 2006, Advanced PID Control, Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Vilanova, R. , and Visioli, A. , 2012, PID Control in the Third Millennium: Lessons Learned and New Approaches, Springer Verlag, Berlin. [CrossRef]
Ukpai, U. I. , and Jayasuriya, S. , 2004, “ Using Controller Reduction Techniques for Efficient PID Controller Synthesis,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 126(3), pp. 692–696. [CrossRef]
Wang, Q.-G. , Ye, Z. , Cai, W.-J. , and Hang, C. C. , 2008, PID Control for Multivariable Processes, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.
Gündeş, A. N. , Özbayb, H. , and Özgüler, A. B. , 2007, “ PID Controller Synthesis for a Class of Unstable MIMO Plants With I/O Delays,” Automatica, 43(1), pp. 135–142. [CrossRef]
Ruiz-López, I. I. , Rodríguez-Jimenes, G. C. , and García-Alvarado, M. A. , 2006, “ Robust MIMO PID Controllers Tuning Based on Complex/Real Ratio of the Characteristic Matrix Eigenvalues,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 61(13), pp. 4332–4340. [CrossRef]
Wang, C. , and Li, D. , 2011, “ Decentralized PID Controllers Based on Probabilistic Robustness,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 133(6), p. 061015. [CrossRef]
Blondel, V. D. , and Tsitsiklis, J. N. , 1997, “ NP-Hardness of Some Linear Control Design Problems,” SIAM J. Control Optim., 35(6), pp. 2118–2127. [CrossRef]
Apkarian, P. , and Noll, D. , 2006, “ Nonsmooth H-Synthesis,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 51(2), pp. 229–244. [CrossRef]
Pradhan, J. K. , and Ghosh, A. , 2015, “ Multi-Input and Multi-Output Proportional-Integral-Derivative Controller Design Via Linear Quadratic Regulator-Linear Matrix Inequality Approach,” IET Control Theory Appl., 9(14), pp. 2140–2145. [CrossRef]
Boyd, S. , Hast, M. , and Åström, K. J. , 2016, “ MIMO PID Tuning Via Iterated LMI Restriction,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 26(8), pp. 1718–1731. [CrossRef]
Wu, Z. , Iqbal, A. , and Ben Amara, F. , 2011, “ LMI-Based Multivariable PID Controller Design and Its Application to the Control of the Surface Shape of Magnetic Fluid Deformable Mirrors,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 19(4), pp. 717–729. [CrossRef]
Zheng, F. , Wang, Q.-G. , and Lee, T. H. , 2002, “ On the Design of Multivariable PID Controllers Via LMI Approach,” Automatica, 38(3), pp. 517–526. [CrossRef]
Lin, C. , Wang, Q.-G. , and Lee, T. H. , 2004, “ An Improvement on Multivariable PID Controller Design Via Iterative LMI Approach,” Automatica, 40(3), pp. 519–525. [CrossRef]
Liu, J. , Lam, J. , Shen, M. , and Shu, Z. , 2017, “ Non-Fragile Multivariable PID Controller Design Via System Augmentation,” Int. J. Syst. Sci., 48(10), pp. 2168–2181. [CrossRef]
Mohamed, Z. , Khairudin, M. , Husain, A. R. , and Subudhi, B. , 2016, “ Linear Matrix Inequality-Based Robust Proportional Derivative Control of a Two-Link Flexible Manipulator,” J. Vib. Control, 22(5), pp. 1244–1256. [CrossRef]
Ge, M. , Chiu, M.-S. , and Wang, Q.-G. , 2002, “ Robust PID Controller Design Via LMI Approach,” J. Process Control, 12(1), pp. 3–13. [CrossRef]
Skogestad, S. , and Postlethwaite, I. , 2005, Multivariable Feedback Control, John Willey and Sons, New York.
Tran Dinh, Q. , Gumussoy, S. , Michiels, W. , and Diehl, M. , 2012, “ Combining Convex-Concave Decompositions and Linearization Approaches for Solving BMIs, With Application to Static Output Feedback,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 57(6), pp. 1377–1390. [CrossRef]
Hast, M. , Åström, K. J. , Bernhardsson, B. , and Boyd, S. , 2013, “ PID Design by Convex-Concave Optimization,” European Control Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 4460–4465.
Gahinet, P. , and Apkarian, P. , 1994, “ A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach to H Control,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 4(4), pp. 421–448. [CrossRef]
Patel, R. V. , and Munro, N. , 1982, Multivariable System Theory and Design, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
Porter, B. , and Khaki-Sedigh, A. , 1990, “ Design of Tunable Digital Set-Point Tracking Controllers for Linear Multivariable Type-One Plants,” Int. J. Syst. Sci., 21(3), pp. 447–461. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The MIMO feedback system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Representation of the MIMO PID tuning as a weighted sensitivity problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Closed-loop step response from r to yp for the PID controlled system, corresponding to Example 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Singular values of S(s) (dash-dotted: iteration 1, dashed: iteration 3, solid: iteration 5) and Bode magnitude plot of Wp−1(s), corresponding to Example 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The effect of using different sets of LMIs for calculating the initial P on the closed-loop step responses. At each case, the controller is obtained after five iterations.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparing the proposed method with hinfstruct function of matlab

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Closed-loop step response from r to yp for the PID controlled system, corresponding to Example 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The effect of using different sets of LMIs for calculating the initial P on the closed-loop step responses. At each case, the controller is obtained after five iterations.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparing the proposed method with hinfstruct function of matlab

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In