0
Technical Brief

A Performance Study of Controlled Impact Timing on Harmonics Reduction in Operational Modal Testing

[+] Author and Article Information
Hong Cheet Lim

Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Malaysia
h_chet_l@siswa.um.edu.my

Alex Ong

Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Malaysia
zhichao83@gmail.com
alexongzc@um.edu.my

Zubaidah Ismail

Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Malaysia
zu_ismail@um.edu.my

Shin Yee Khoo

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur, 50603 Malaysia
khooshinyee@um.edu.my

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4041609 History: Received July 05, 2017; Revised September 27, 2018

Abstract

As an alternative to operational modal analysis (OMA) and classical experimental modal analysis (EMA), a novel method was introduced previously namely impact-synchronous modal analysis (ISMA). The effectiveness ISMA on rotor and structural dynamic systems has been proven in previous literature. More recently, an automated impact device (AID) was introduced which utilised tachometer pulse as initiation signal and its effectiveness on ISMA was proven. An attempt to further enhance this device in term of equipment and cost is then proposed by replacing the tachometer with the in-use tri-axial accelerometer through utilising the filtered response of cyclic load component as an initiation signal to control the impact device, which is also the primary aim for this study. Prior to modal testing, accuracy of this device is illustrated at desired phase angles of 0°, 90°, 180° and 270°. Subsequently, frequency response function (FRF) estimations obtained for ISMA using enhanced AID has demonstrated the suppression capabilities of this device on disturbances, i.e., reduction of 93.58 % at 30 Hz and 57.78 % at 60 Hz, resulting in a high correlation for signature assurance criterion (SAC) and cross signature assurance criterion (CSAC). Modal parameters extracted from the EMA and ISMA using impact device are presented and compared, for the first three natural modes of the test rig. It is found that natural frequencies are deviating by less than 6% whereas modal assurance criterion (MAC) values between the mode shapes of the two tests are found to be above 0.9.

Copyright (c) 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In