0
Research Papers

Nonlinear Estimation of Variables for Heat Release Calculation Using a Gradient Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Lianhao Yin

Department of Energy Sciences,
Lund University,
Lund 223 63, Sweden
e-mail: Lianhao.Yin@energy.lth.se

Gabriel Turesson

Department of Automatic Control,
Lund University,
Lund 223 63, Sweden
e-mail: Gabriel@control.lth.se

Rolf Johansson

Department of Automatic Control,
Lund University,
Lund 223 63, Sweden
e-mail: Rolf.Johansson@control.lth.se

Per Tunestål

Department of Energy Sciences,
Lund University,
Lund 223 63, Sweden
e-mail: Per.Tunestal@energy.lth.se

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT,AND CONTROL. Manuscript received September 18, 2017; final manuscript received February 6, 2019; published online March 8, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Junmin Wang.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 141(6), 061011 (Mar 08, 2019) (9 pages) Paper No: DS-17-1473; doi: 10.1115/1.4042877 History: Received September 18, 2017; Revised February 06, 2019

Advanced combustion such as the partially premixed combustion (PPC) is characterized by high energy efficiency. However, they are sensitive to the inlet condition and injection of a combustion engine. Therefore, it is essential to use combustion feedback. The accuracy of the feedback variables, derived from the cylinder pressure signal, is crucial for effective combustion feedback control. This paper proposes a nonlinear least-squares regression method to estimate the pressure offsets and variable polytropic exponent in heat release calculation automatically. The combustion feedback variables derived from the auto-tuned heat-release rate were applied to a heavy-duty compression ignition (CI) engine burning with gasoline fuel.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Powell, J. D. , 1993, “ Engine Control Using Cylinder Pressure: Past, Present, and Future,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 115(2B), pp. 343–350. [CrossRef]
Sellnau, M. C. , Matekunas, F. A. , Battiston, P. A. , Chang, C.-F. , and Lancaster, D. R. , 2000, “ Cylinder-Pressure-Based Engine Control Using Pressure-Ratio-Management and Low-Cost Non-Intrusive Cylinder Pressure Sensors,” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0932.
Husted, H. , Kruger, D. , Fattic, G. , Ripley, G. , and Kelly, E. , 2007, “ Cylinder Pressure-Based Control of Pre-Mixed Diesel Combustion,” SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0773.
Tunestål, P. , 2001, “ Estimation of the In-Cylinder Air/Fuel Ratio of an Internal Combustion Engine by the Use of Pressure Sensors,” Ph.D. thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/d7c69d47-fe7b-4673-96a0-15c670590a78
Guardiola, C. , Olmeda, P. , Pla, B. , and Bares, P. , 2017, “ In-Cylinder Pressure Based Model for Exhaust Temperature Estimation in Internal Combustion Engines,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 115, pp. 212–220. [CrossRef]
Henningsson, M. , Tunestål, P. , and Johansson, R. , 2012, “ A Virtual Sensor for Predicting Diesel Engine Emissions From Cylinder Pressure Data,” Workshop on Engine and Powertrain Control, Simulation and Modeling, IFAC, Rueil-Malmaison, France, Oct. 23–25, pp. 424–431.
Willems, F. , Doosje, E. , Engels, F. , and Seykens, X. , 2010, “ Cylinder Pressure-Based Control in Heavy-Duty EGR Diesel Engines Using a Virtual Heat Release and Emission Sensor,” SAE Paper No. 2010-01-0564.
Randolph, A. L. , 1990, “ Methods of Processing Cylinder-Pressure Transducer Signals to Maximize Data Accuracy,” SAE Paper No. 900170.
Eriksson, L. , 1998, “ Requirements for and a Systematic Method for Identifying Heat-Release Model Parameters,” SAE Paper No. 980626.
Heywood, J. B. , 1988, Internal Combustion Engines Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Gatowski, J. , Balles, E. N. , Chun, K. M. , Nelson, F. E. , Ekchian, J. A. , and Heywood, J. B. , 1984, “ Heat Release Analysis of Engine Pressure Data,” SAE Paper No. 841359.
Lee, K. , Yoon, M. , and Sunwoo, M. , 2008, “ A Study on Pegging Methods for Noisy Cylinder Pressure Signal,” Control Eng. Pract., 16(8), pp. 922–929. [CrossRef]
Tunestål, P. , 2009, “ Self-Tuning Gross Heat Release Computation for Internal Combustion Engines,” Control Eng. Pract., 17(4), pp. 518–524. [CrossRef]
Tunestål, P. , 2011, “ TDC Offset Estimation From Motored Cylinder Pressure Data Based on Heat Release Shaping,” IFP Energies Nouvelles, 66(4), pp. 705–716. [CrossRef]
Barzilai, J. , and Borwein, J. , 1988, “ Two-Point Step Size Gradient Methods,” IMA J. Numer. Anal., 8(1), pp. 141–149. [CrossRef]
Yin, L. , Ingesson, G. , Tunestål, P. , Johansson, R. , and Johansson, B. , 2016, “ An Experimental Investigation of a Multi-Cylinder Engine With Gasoline-Like Fuel Towards a High Engine Efficiency,” SAE Paper No. 2016-01-0763.
Yin, L. , Ingesson, G. , Shamun, S. , Tunestål, P. , Johansson, R. , and Johansson, B. , 2015, “ Sensitivity Analysis of Partially Premixed Combustion (PPC) for Control Purposes,” SAE Paper No. 2015-01-0884.
Boyd, S. , and Vandenberghe, L. , Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Heat-release rate with heat transfer loss of a typical PPC point [16]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Engine configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Illustration of the pressure signal from one cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Illustration of heat-release rate and cumulative heat-release rate as an average of 100 cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Estimate κ̂ in 100 cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Estimate κ̂ and in-cylinder temperature trace through the whole combustion period

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Heat-release rate using three different methods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Cumulative heat-release rate. The dashed line is the total energy of the burned fuel. The three methods have the accuracy of 84%, 76%, and 98% in terms of the total energy of the burned fuel, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Combustion phasing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The end of the combustion timing and the combustion duration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison between the linear regression and the proposed nonlinear regression method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Autocovariance of the estimation results

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In