Research Papers

FLane: An Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Lane Tracking System for Driver Assistance

[+] Author and Article Information
Giulio Reina1

Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italygiulio.reina@unisalento.it

Annalisa Milella

Institute of Intelligent Systems for Automation, National Research Council, Via G. Amendola 122/D, 70126 Bari, Italymilella@ba.issia.cnr.it


Corresponding author.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 133(2), 021002 (Feb 11, 2011) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4003091 History: Received July 09, 2008; Revised July 23, 2010; Published February 11, 2011; Online February 11, 2011

In the last few years, driver assistance systems are increasingly being investigated in the automotive field to provide a higher degree of safety and comfort. Lane position determination plays a critical role toward the development of autonomous and computer-aided driving. This paper presents an accurate and robust method for detecting road markings with applications to autonomous vehicles and driver support. Much like other lane detection systems, ours is based on computer vision and Hough transform. The proposed approach, however, is unique in that it uses fuzzy reasoning to combine adaptively geometrical and intensity information of the scene in order to handle varying driving and environmental conditions. Since our system uses fuzzy logic operations for lane detection and tracking, we call it “FLane.” This paper also presents a method for building the initial lane model in real time, during vehicle motion, and without any a priori information. Details of the main components of the FLane system are presented along with experimental results obtained in the field under different lighting and road conditions.

Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Driver assistance systems that require lane position: (a) lane-departure warning, (b) driver-attention monitoring, and (c) vehicle-control

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Sample images of road markings and conditions: (a) simple road with solid lane marking, (b) disturbances due to curb and manhole cover, (c) transversal solid lines due to side road enters, (d) nonuniform pavement texture, (e) freeway overpass causing lighting change and reducing road-marking contrast, and (f) low lighting and shadowing at night time

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Model of the lane marking in the image plane. Note that the parameters ρ1, ρ2, and ρ are expressed in pixels.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Model of the lane marking in the real world. Note that the distances d1 and d2 are expressed in millimeters.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Membership function of the intensity indicator. If the degree of membership is greater than a threshold T (T=0.7 in our case), then the pixel is accepted, and it is set to 1 (white), otherwise it is disregarded, and it is set to 0 (black).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Results of a sample image binarization using the fuzzy edge detection module: (a) selected ROI, (b) fuzzy thresholding using the Intensity Indicator, (c) Canny edge detection, and (d) Boolean AND of the two previous operations. Note that the negatives of the binary images are shown for visualization’s sake.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Membership functions of the FLR module

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Fuzzy lane selection applied to a sample image. Five lines were selected forming ten lane marker candidates.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Lane detection for a sample image where extraneous transversal white road markings are present: (a) output of the FED module and (b) indication of the lane marker candidates

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

DMB: input and output membership functions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Conceptual scheme of the CHM

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Result of the DMB module applied to a sample sequence: (a) first frame of the sequence, (b) fifth frame of the sequence, (c) representation of the CHM, and (d) selected lane marker model. Images (a) and (b) report indication of the confidence assigned to the selected lane marker.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Example of robust marker model building: (a)-(l) consecutive frames used for model building; (m) marker model obtained as output of the DMB module. Although the absence of the main lane marker in (d) or the presence of multiple lines in (e), (f) and results in misidentifications, the DMB module retains a correct model.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

The test bed used for experimental validation of the FLane system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Example of false positive due the presence of a manhole cover: (a) grey lines (red lines in the online version of the paper): erroneous lane marker estimated by the FLane system and black lines: lane candidates; and (b) output of the FED module

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Example of false negative due to poor image segmentation: (a) black lines: lane candidates; and (b) output of the FED module.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In