Research Papers

Developing Compact Models of Terrain Surfaces

[+] Author and Article Information
John B. Ferris

e-mail: jbferris@vt.edu
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
150 Slayton Avenue,
Danville, VA 24540

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received February 24, 2012; final manuscript received July 12, 2013; published online August 23, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Sean Brennan.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 135(6), 061008 (Aug 23, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: DS-12-1070; doi: 10.1115/1.4025016 History: Received February 24, 2012; Revised July 12, 2013

Terrain topology is the principal source of vertical excitation to the vehicle system and must be accurately represented in order to correctly predict the vehicle response. It is desirable to evaluate vehicle and tire models over a wide range of terrain types, but it is computationally impractical to simulate long distances of every terrain variation. This work seeks to study the terrain surface, rather than the terrain profile, to maximize the information available to the tire model (i.e., wheel path data), yet represent it in a compact form. A method to decompose the terrain surface as a combination of deterministic and stochastic components is presented. If some, or all, of the components of the terrain surface are considered to be stochastic, then the sequence can be modeled as a stochastic process. These stochastic representations of terrain surfaces can then be implemented in tire and vehicle models to predict chassis loads.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Aurell, J., and Edlund, S., 1989, “Operating Severity Distribution—A Base for Vehicle Optimization,” 11th International Association of Vehicle System Dynamics Symposium (IAVSD 1989), Kingston, ON, Vol. 18, pp. 42–56.
Chaika, M., Gorsich, D., and Sun, T. C., 2004, “Some Statistical Tests in the Study of Terrain Modeling,” Int. J. Veh. Des., 36(2–3), pp. 132–148. [CrossRef]
Brandenburg, E. L., and Rudd, T. J., 1974, “Development of an Inertial Profilometer,” Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC, Report No. FRA-ORD&D-75-15.
Karamihas, S. M., 2005, “ACPA Profiler Repeatability Tests,” Transportation Research Institute. Ann Arbor, MI, Report No. UMTRI-2005-35.
Kern, J. V., and Ferris, J. B., 2007, “Development of a 3D Vehicle-Terrain Measurement System Part I: Equipment Setup,” Proceedings of the Joint North America, Asia-Pacific ISTVS Conference, Fairbanks, AK.
Wagner, S. M., Kern, J. V., and Ferris, J. B., 2007, “Development of a 3-D Vehicle-Terrain Measurement System Part II: Signal Processing and Validation,” ISTVS: Innovations in Terrain and Vehicle Systems, Fairbanks, AK.
Ferris, J. B., 1999, “Factors Affecting Perceptions of Ride Quality in Automobiles,” Dyn. Syst. Controls, 67 pp. 649–654.
Ahlin, K., Granlund, J., and Lindstrom, F., 2004, “Comparing Road Profiles With Vehicle Perceived Roughness,” Int. J. Veh. Des., 35(2–3), pp. 270–286. [CrossRef]
Lu, M. W., and Lee, Y. L., 1996, “Reliability Based Strength/Fatigue Design Criteria,” Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Piscataway, NJ.
Liu, C., and Herman, R., 1999, “Road Profile, Vehicle Dynamics, and Ride Quality Rating,” J. Transp. Eng., 125(2), pp. 123–128. [CrossRef]
Stadterman, T. J., Connon, W., Choi, W., Freeman, J. S., and Peltz, A. L., 2003, “Dynamic Modeling and Durability Analysis From the Ground up,” J. Inst. Environ Sci. Technol., 46, pp. 128–134.
Bogsjo, K., and Forsan, A., 2004, “Fatigue Relevant Road Surface Statistics,” Veh. Syst. Dyn., 41, pp. 724–733.
Lei, G., and Yang, R. J., 2006, “On Reliability-Based Optimisation Methods for Automotive Structures,” Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol., 25(1–3), pp. 3–26.
Duni, E., Toniato, G., Saponaro, R., and Smeriglio, P., 2008, “Vehicle Fatigue Load Prediction Based on Finite Element Tire/Road Interaction Implemented in an Integrated Implicit-Explicit Approach,” 2008 Abaqus Users' Conference, Newport, RI, p. 16.
Chemistruck, H., BinnsR., and Ferris, J. B., 2010, “Correcting INS Drift in Terrain Measurements,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 133(2), p. 021009. [CrossRef]
Wagner, S. M., and Ferris, J. B., 2007, “A Polynomial Chaos Approach to ARIMA Modeling and Terrain Characterization,” Proceedings of SPIE: Modeling and Simulation for Military Applications, Orlando, FL.
Wagner, S. M., and Ferris, J. B., 2008, “Reduced Order ARIMA Models of 2-D Terrain Profiles Using Singular Value Decomposition,” ASME International Congress and Exposition, Paper No. IMECE2007-43388, Seattle, WA.
Wagner, S., and Ferris, J. B., 2012, “Residual Analysis of Autoregressive Models of Terrain Topology,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 134(3), p. 031003. [CrossRef]
Chemistruck, H., and Ferris, J. B., 2012, “Using a Galerkin Approach to Define Terrain Surfaces,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 134(2), p. 021017. [CrossRef]
Herr, W. J., 1996, “Highway Profile Measuring System,” U.S. Patent No. 5,510,889.
Kennedy, S., Hamilton, J., and Martell, H., 2006, “Architecture and System Performance of SPAN-NovAtel's GPS/INS Solution,” Position, Location, and Navigation Symposium, San Diego, CA.
Lanyi, G. E., and Roth, T., 1988, “A Comparison of Mapped and Measured Total Ionospheric Electron Content Using Global Positioning System and Beacon Satellites,” Radio Sci., 23(4), pp. 483–492. [CrossRef]
Coco, D. S., Coker, C., Dahlke, S. R., and Clynch, J. R., 1991, “Variability of GPS Satellite Differential Group Delay Biases,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 27(6), pp. 931–938. [CrossRef]
Sardon, E., Rius, A., and Zarraoa, N., 1994, “Estimation of the Transmitter and Receiver Differential Biases and the Ionospheric Total Electron Content From Global Positioning System Observations,” Radio Sci., 29(3), pp. 577–586. [CrossRef]
Sardon, E., and Zarraoa, N., 1997, “Estimation of Total Electron Content Using GPS Data: How Stable are Differential Satellite and Receiver Instrumental Biases?,” Radio Sci., 32(5), pp. 1899–1910. [CrossRef]
Mannucci, A. J., Hajj, G. A., Lijima, B. A., Komjathy, A., Meehan, T. K., Pi, X. Q., and Modlwin, M., 2004, “GPS-Based Remote Sensing of the Geospace Environment: Horizontal and Vertical Structure of the Ionosphere and Plasmasphere,” Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Ocean, Environment, and Space 2004, Honolulu, HI.
Sarma, A. D., Rao, G. S., Rao, P. V. D. S., and Ramalingam, K., 2008, “GPS Satellite and Receiver Instrumental Biases Estimation using SVD Algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 44(4), pp. 1560–1566. [CrossRef]
Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., 2008, Time Series Analyisis: Forecasting and Control, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Wagner, S., and Ferris, J. B., 2012, “Developing Compact Autoregressive Characterizations of Terrain Topology Profiles,” Int. J. Veh. Syst. Model. Test., 7(1), pp. 12–25. [CrossRef]
Kern, J. V., and Ferris, J. B., 2006, “Characterizing 2-D Topographic Mappings of Roads,” Proceedings of the ASME International Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL.
Kern, J. V., and Ferris, J. B., 2006, “Preliminary Results for Model Identification in Characterizing 2-D Topographic Road Profiles,” Modeling and Simulation for Military Applications, Kissimmee, FL.
Li, L., and Sandu, C., 2007, “Modeling and Simulation of 2D ARMA Terrain Models for Vehicle Dynamics Applications,” SAE World Congress and Exhibition, Detroit, MI.
Gimmler, H., Ammon, D., and Rauh, J., 2005, “Road Profiles: Mobile Measurement, Data Processing for Efficient Simulation and Assessment of Road Properties,” VDI Report No. 1912, pp. 335–352.
Rauh, J., and Mossner-Beigel, M., 2008, “Tyre Simulation Challenges,” Veh. Syst. Dyn.46(Suppl 1), pp. 49–62. [CrossRef]
VIRES, Oct. 2008, Nov. 12, 2009, “OpenCRG,” Retrieved Nov. 18, 2009, from http://www.opencrg.org/
Detweiler, Z. R., and Ferris, J. B., 2009, “Interpolation Methods for High-Fidelity Three Dimensional Terrain Surfaces,” J. Terramech., 47(4), pp. 209–217. [CrossRef]
Detweiler, Z. R., and Ferris, J. B., 2008, “Uniform Grid Spacing for Three Dimensional High Fidelity Terrain Profiles,” 16th International Conference of the International Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Turin, Italy.
Smith, H., and Ferris, J. B., 2008, “Post Processing Techniques to Correct Inertial Errors in High Fidelity Terrain Topology Measurements,” International Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Torino, Italy.
Smith, H. F., and Ferris, J. B., 2009, “Calibration Surface Design and Accuracy Verification Procedure for Terrain Measurement Systems,” J. Test. Eval., 38(4), pp. 6–7.
Kern, J. V., and Ferris, J. B., 2007, “Developing ARIMA Road Profile Models with a Stationary Residual Process,” Proceedings of the Fifth IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control, Aptos, CA.
Sayers, M. W., 1989, “Two Quarter-Car Models for Defining Road Roughness. IRI and HRI,” Transportation Research Record No. 1215, pp. 165–172.
Sayers, M. W., 1995, “On the Calculation of International Roughness Index From Longitudinal Road Profile,” Transportation Research Record No. 1501, pp. 1–12.
Hajek, J. J., Kazmierowski, T. J., and Musgrove, G., 1998, “Switching to International Roughness Index,” Transportation Research Record No. 1643, pp. 116–124.
Attoh-Okine, N. O., Ayenu-Prah, A. Y., Jr., and Mensah, S. A., 2006, “Application of the Empirical Mode Decomposition to Pavement Profile Analysis,” GeoCongress, Atlanta, GA.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Creating a uniform grid (curved regular grid) in the horizontal plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Defining the surface coordinate system (u, v, s) in a CRG format

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Example of a discretized terrain surface in curved regular grid format

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Original terrain profile measured with VTMS of longitudinally tined concrete located at MnRoad test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

First two empirical basis vectors for a sample of U.S. Highway data, bl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

First two analytic basis vectors for a sample of U.S. Highway data, pl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

First two empirical components of terrain for a sample of U.S. Highway data, σi,l

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

First two analytic components of terrain, σi,l for a sample of U.S. Highway data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparing true surface to subsequent empirical truncated surfaces for a sample of U.S. Highway data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Partial autocorrelation of the second empirical component of terrain σi,2 for a sample of U.S. Highway data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Empirical bank angle component of terrain and AR synthesis of bank angle component of terrain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparing true surface to truncated surface with AR synthesized bank angle component of terrain



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In