Technical Brief

A Novel Method for Indirect Estimation of Tire Pressure

[+] Author and Article Information
Selim Solmaz

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Gediz University,
Seyrek-Menemen, Izmir 35665, Turkey

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received February 5, 2015; final manuscript received January 25, 2016; published online March 10, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Junmin Wang.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 138(5), 054501 (Mar 10, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: DS-15-1058; doi: 10.1115/1.4032744 History: Received February 05, 2015; Revised January 25, 2016

In this paper, a novel algorithm for indirect tire failure indication is described. The estimation method is based on measuring changes in the lateral dynamics behavior resulting from certain types of tire failure modes including excessive deflation or significant thread loss in a combination of tires. Given the fact that both failures will notably affect the lateral dynamics behavior, quantifying these changes constitutes the basis of the estimation method. In achieving this, multiple models and switching method are utilized based on lateral dynamics models of the vehicle that are parametrized to account for the uncertainty in tire pressure levels. The results are demonstrated using representative numerical simulations.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Pressure , Vehicles , Tires
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005, “ Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, FMVSS No.138: Tire Pressure Monitoring System,” Final Regulatory Impact Analysis, Technical Report.
European Union, 2010, “ European Union UNECE Vehicle Regulations—1958 Agreement. Addendum No. 63, Regulation No. 64-Rev.1,” E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.63/Rev.1.
Gustafsson, F. , 2009, “ Automotive Safety Systems: Replacing Costly Sensors With Software Algorithms,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 26(4), pp. 32–47. [CrossRef]
Persson, N. , Gustafsson, F. , and Drevö, M. , 2002, “ Indirect Tire Pressure Monitoring Using Sensor Fusion,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2002-01-1250.
Suender, R. , Prokop, G. , and Roscher, T. , 2015, “ Comparative Analysis of Tire Evaluation Methods for an Indirect Tire Pressure Monitoring System (iTPMS),” SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars Mech. Syst., 8, pp. 110–118.
Thiriez, K. K. , 2003, “ Evaluation of Indirect Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems Using Data From NCSA's Tire Pressure Special Study,” 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 1–8.
van Zanten, A. T. , 2002, “ Evolution of Electronic Control Systems for Improving the Vehicle Dynamic Behavior,” AVEC’02 International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, Hiroshima, Japan.
U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007, “ Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, FMVSS No.126: Electronic Stability Control Systems, Final Regulatory Impact Analysis,” Technical Report.
Kiencke, U. , and Nielsen, L. , 2000, Automotive Control Systems for Engine, Driveline and Vehicle, Springer-Verlag & SAE International, Berlin.
Pacejka, H. B. , 2005, Tire and Vehicle Dynamics, 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
Solmaz, S. , Akar, M. , Shorten, R. , and Kalkkuhl, J. , 2008, “ Realtime Multiple-Model Estimation of Center of Gravity Position in Automotive Vehicles,” Veh. Syst. Dyn. J., 46(9), pp. 763–788. [CrossRef]
Narendra, K. S. , and Balakrishnan, J. , 1994, “ Improving Transient Response of Adaptive Control Systems Using Multiple Models and Switching,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 39(9), pp. 1861–1866. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Effect of inflation pressure on the tire contact patch geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Tire failure modes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The flow diagram for the indirect tire pressure estimation method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of lateral tire force with changing vertical force and sideslip angle for two sets of tire parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Simulated input signals for the vehicle during a double lane change maneuver at constant speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Simulation results with comparison of the measured values and their switched estimates



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In