Research Papers

Maximizing Wind Energy Capture for Speed-Constrained Wind Turbines During Partial Load Operation

[+] Author and Article Information
Zeyu Yan, Victor Yu, Matthew Chu Cheong

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712

Mohamed L. Shaltout

Mechanical Design and Production Department,
Faculty of Engineering,
Cairo University,
Giza 12613, Egypt

Dongmei Chen

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: dmchen@me.utexas.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received June 9, 2014; final manuscript received June 11, 2016; published online July 21, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Yongchun Fang.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 138(9), 091014 (Jul 21, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: DS-14-1249; doi: 10.1115/1.4033906 History: Received June 09, 2014; Revised June 11, 2016

With the development of wind turbine technology, more wind turbines operate in the partial load region, where one of the main objectives is to maximize captured wind energy. This paper presents the development of an optimal control framework to maximize wind energy capture for wind turbines with limited rotor speed ranges. Numerical optimal control (NOC) techniques were applied to search for the achievable maximum power coefficient, thus maximum wind energy capture. Augmentations of these optimal techniques significantly reduced the computational cost. Simulation results show that, in comparison with the traditional torque feedback and conventional optimal control algorithms, the proposed augmented optimal control algorithm increases the harvested energy while minimizing the computational expense for speed-constrained wind turbines during partial load operation.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Blanco, M. I. , 2009, “ The Economics of Wind Energy,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 13(6), pp. 1372–1382. [CrossRef]
Pao, L. Y. , and Johnson, K. E. , 2011, “ Control of Wind Turbines,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 31(2), pp. 44–62. [CrossRef]
Pao, L. Y. , and Johnson, K. E. , 2009, “ A Tutorial on the Dynamics and Control of Wind Turbines and Wind Farms,” American Control Conference, pp. 2076–2089.
Laks, J. H. , Pao, L. Y. , and Wright, A. D. , 2009, “ Control of Wind Turbines: Past, Present, and Future,” American Control Conference, pp. 2096–2103.
Johnson, K. E. , Fingersh, L. J. , Balas, M. J. , and Pao, L. Y. , 2004, “ Methods for Increasing Region 2 Power Capture on a Variable-Speed Wind Turbine,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 126(4), pp. 1092–1100. [CrossRef]
Zou, Y. , Elbuluk, M. E. , and Sozer, Y. , 2013, “ Stability Analysis of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Method in Wind Power Systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 49(3), pp. 1129–1136. [CrossRef]
Abdeddaim, S. , and Betka, A. , 2013, “ Optimal Tracking and Robust Power Control of the DFIG Wind Turbine,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 49, pp. 234–242. [CrossRef]
Dang, D. Q. , Wang, Y. , and Cai, W. , 2009, “ A Multi-Objective Optimal Nonlinear Control of Variable Speed Wind Turbine,” IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, pp. 17–22.
Akermann, T. , 2005, Wind Power in Power Systems, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Carlin, P. W. , Laxson, A. S. , and Muljadi, E. B. , 2003, “ The History and State of the Art of Variable-Speed Wind Turbine Technology,” Wind Energy, 6(2), pp. 129–159. [CrossRef]
Hall, J. F. , and Chen, D. , 2012, “ Performance of a 100 kW Wind Turbine With a Variable Ratio Gearbox,” Renewable Energy, 44, pp. 261–266. [CrossRef]
Hall, J. F. , and Chen, D. , 2013, “ Dynamic Optimization of Drivetrain Gear Ratio to Maximize Wind Turbine Power Generation-Part 1: System Model and Control Framework,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 135(1), p. 11016. [CrossRef]
Shaltout, M. L. , Hall, J. F. , and Chen, D. , 2014, “ Optimal Control of a Wind Turbine With a Variable Ratio Gearbox for Maximum Energy Capture and Prolonged Gear Life,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 136(3), p. 31007. [CrossRef]
Schlipf, D. , Schlipf, D. J. , and Kuhn, M. , 2013, “ Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Wind Turbines Using LIDAR,” Wind Energy, 16(7), pp. 1107–1129. [CrossRef]
Schlipf, D. , and Cheng, P. W. , 2013, “ Adaptive Feed Forward Control for Wind Turbines,” At-Automatisierungstechnik, 61(5), pp. 329–338. [CrossRef]
Johnson, K. E. , Pao, L. Y. , Balas, M. J. , and Fingersh, L. J. , 2006, “ Control of Variable-Speed Wind Turbines: Standard and Adaptive Techniques for Maximizing Energy Capture,” IEEE Control Syst., 26(3), pp. 70–81. [CrossRef]
Song, Y. D. , Dhinakaran, B. , and Bao, X. Y. , 2000, “ Variable Speed Control of Wind Turbines Using Nonlinear and Adaptive Algorithms,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 85(3), pp. 293–308. [CrossRef]
Frost, S. A. , Balas, M. J. , and Wright, A. D. , 2009, “ Direct Adaptive Control of a Utility-Scale Wind Turbine for Speed Regulation,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 19(1), pp. 59–71. [CrossRef]
Koutroulis, E. , and Kalaitzakis, K. , 2006, “ Design of a Maximum Power Tracking System for Wind-Energy-Conversion Applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 53(2), pp. 486–494. [CrossRef]
Wang, Q. C. , and Chang, L. C. , 2004, “ An Intelligent Maximum Power Extraction Algorithm for Inverter-Based Variable Speed Wind Turbine Systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 19(5), pp. 1242–1249. [CrossRef]
Barakati, S. M. , Kazerani, M. , and Aplevich, J. D. , 2009, “ Maximum Power Tracking Control for a Wind Turbine System Including a Matrix Converter,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 24(3), pp. 705–713. [CrossRef]
Dalala, Z. M. , Zahid, Z. U. , Yu, W. , Cho, Y. , and Lai, J. , 2013, “ Design and Analysis of an MPPT Technique for Small-Scale Wind Energy Conversion Systems,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 28(3), pp. 756–767. [CrossRef]
Liu, J. , and Peng, H. , 2008, “ Modeling and Control of a Power-Split Hybrid Vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 16(6), pp. 1242–1251. [CrossRef]
Stryk, O. , and Bulirsch, R. , 1992, “ Direct and Indirect Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Ann. Oper. Res., 37(1), pp. 357–373. [CrossRef]
Hull, D. G. , 2003, Optimal Control Theory for Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sargent, R. W. H. , 2000, “ Optimal Control,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., 124(1), pp. 361–371. [CrossRef]
Hull, D. G. , 1997, “ Conversion of Optimal Control Problems Into Parameter Optimization Problems,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 20(1), pp. 57–60. [CrossRef]
Gornov, A. Y. , Tyatyushkin, A. I. , and Finkelstein, E. A. , 2013, “ Numerical Methods for Solving Applied Optimal Control Problems,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 53(12), pp. 1825–1838. [CrossRef]
Noton, A. , Dyer, P. , and Markland, C. , 1967, “ Numerical Computation of Optimal Control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 12(1), pp. 59–66. [CrossRef]
Heier, S. , 2006, Grid Integration of Wind Energy Conversion Systems, 2nd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Hall, J. F. , Mecklenborg, C. A. , Chen, D. , and Pratap, S. B. , 2011, “ Wind Energy Conversion With a Variable-Ratio Gearbox: Design and Analysis,” Renewable Energy, 36(3), pp. 1075–1080. [CrossRef]
Hager, W. W. , 1999, “ Stabilized Sequential Quadratic Programming,” Comput. Optim. Appl., 12(1), pp. 253–273.
Frank, E. C. , and Michael, L. O. , 2012, “ A Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithm for Nonconvex, Nonsmooth Constrained Optimization,” SIAM J. Optim., 22(2), pp. 474–500. [CrossRef]
Wang, F. , Zhang, H. , and Liu, D. , 2009, “ Adaptive Dynamic Programming: An Introduction,” IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag., 4(2), pp. 39–47. [CrossRef]
Iyengar, G. N. , 2005, “ Robust Dynamic Programming,” Math. Oper. Res., 30(2), pp. 257–280. [CrossRef]
Lexa, M. A. , Davies, M. E. , Thompson, J. S. , and Nikolic, J. , 2011, “ Compressive Power Spectral Density Estimation,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 3884–3887.
Lee, D. , and Baldick, R. , 2013, “ Future Wind Power Scenario Synthesis Through Power Spectral Density Analysis,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 5(1), pp. 490–500. [CrossRef]
Lange, M. , 2005, “ On the Uncertainty of Wind Power Predictions—Analysis of the Forecast Accuracy and Statistical Distribution of Errors,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 127(2), pp. 177–184.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Plot of the aerodynamic power coefficient versus the rotor tip speed ratio with different blade pitch angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Performance comparison between NOC and TFC controllers (high wind speed)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison between Cp with and without uncertainty

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Performance comparison of controllers including TFC, DS, conventional DP, and augmented DP (low wind speed)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Performance comparison among controllers including TFC, DS with a good initial guess, conventional DP, and augmented DP (low wind speed)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Performance comparison between NOC and TFC controllers under continuous wind speed input



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In