0
Research Papers

Fault Detection and Isolation for Complex Thermal Management Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Pamela J. Tannous

Mechanical Science and Engineering
Department,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: tannous2@illinois.edu

Andrew G. Alleyne

Mechanical Science and Engineering
Department,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: alleyne@illinois.edu

Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT,AND CONTROL. Manuscript received May 15, 2018; final manuscript received January 26, 2019; published online February 21, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Youngsu Cha.

J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 141(6), 061008 (Feb 21, 2019) (10 pages) Paper No: DS-18-1238; doi: 10.1115/1.4042675 History: Received May 15, 2018; Revised January 26, 2019

This paper presents a fault detection and isolation (FDI) approach for actuator faults of complex thermal management systems. In the case of safety critical systems, early fault diagnosis not only improves system reliability, but can also help prevent complete system failure (i.e., aircraft system). In this work, a robust unknown input observer (UIO)-based actuator FDI approach is applied on an example aircraft fluid thermal management system (FTMS). Robustness is achieved by decoupling the effect of unknown inputs modeled as additive disturbances (i.e., modeling errors, linearization errors, parameter variations, or model order reduction errors) from the residuals generated from a bank of UIOs. Robustness is central to avoid false alarms without reducing residual sensitivity to actual faults in the system. System dynamics are modeled using a graph-based approach. A structure preserving aggregation-based model-order reduction technique is used to reduce the complexity of the dynamic model. A reduced-order linearized state space model is then used in a bank of UIOs to generate a set of structured robust (in the sense of disturbance decoupling) residuals. Simulation and experimental results show successful (i.e., no false alarms) actuator FDI in the presence of unknown inputs.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Favre, C. , 1994, “ Fly-By-Wire for Commercial Aircraft: The Airbus Experience,” Int. J. Control, 59(1), pp. 139–157. [CrossRef]
Kiyak, E. , Cetin, O. , and Kahvecioglu, A. , 2008, “ Aircraft Sensor Fault Detection Based on Unknown Input Observers,” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. Int. J., 80(5), pp. 545–548. [CrossRef]
Briere, D. , and Traverse, P. , 1993, “ AIRBUS A320/A330/A340 Electrical Flight Controls a Family of Fault-Tolerant Systems,” 23rd International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing (FTCS-23), Toulouse, France, June 22–24, pp. 616–623.
Castaldi, P. , Geri, W. , Bonfè, M. , Simani, S. , and Benini, M. , 2010, “ Design of Residual Generators and Adaptive Filters for the FDI of Aircraft Model Sensors,” Control Eng. Pract., 18(5), pp. 449–459. [CrossRef]
Dimogianopoulos, D. G. , Hios, J. D. , and Fassois, S. D. , 2009, “ FDI for Aircraft Systems Using Stochastic Pooled-NARMAX Representations: Design and Assessment,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 17(6), pp. 1385–1397. [CrossRef]
Bokor, J. , Ganguli, S. , Szaszi, I. , Balas, G. J. , and Marcos, A. , 2002, “ Application of FDI to a Nonlinear Boeing-747 Aircraft,” Tenth Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED2002), Lisbon, Portugal, July 9–12.
Xue, W. , Guo, Y. Q. , and Zhang, X. D. , 2008, “ Application of a Bank of Kalman Filters and a Robust Kalman Filter for Aircraft Engine Sensor/actuator Fault Diagnosis,” Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control, 4(12), pp. 3161–3168.
Fravolini, M. L. , Brunori, V. , Campa, G. , Napolitano, M. R. , and Cava, M. L. , 2009, “ Structural Analysis Approach for the Generation of Structured Residuals for Aircraft FDI,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 45(4), p. 1446. [CrossRef]
Wang, D. , and Lum, K.-Y. , 2007, “ Adaptive Unknown Input Observer Approach for Aircraft Actuator Fault Detection and Isolation,” Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process, 21(1), pp. 31–48.
Goupil, P. , 2011, “ AIRBUS State of the Art and Practices on FDI and FTC in Flight Control System,” Control Eng. Pract., 19(6), pp. 524–539. [CrossRef]
Seng, Y. , and Srinivasan, R. , 2010, “ Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Multi-Agent Based Collaborative Fault Detection and Identification in Chemical Processes,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 23(6), pp. 934–949. [CrossRef]
Chetouani, Y. , 2008, “ Design of a Multi-Model Observer-Based Estimator for Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) Strategy: Application to a Chemical Reactor,” Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 25(4), pp. 777–788. [CrossRef]
Sotomayor, O. A. Z. , and Odloak, D. , 2005, “ Observer-Based Fault Diagnosis in Chemical Plants,” Chem. Eng. J., 112(1–3), pp. 93–108. [CrossRef]
Roy, K. , Banavar, R. N. , and Thangasamy, S. , 1998, “ Application of Fault Detection and Identification (FDI) Techniques in Power Regulating Systems of Nuclear Reactors,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 45(6), pp. 3184–3201. [CrossRef]
Upadhyaya, B. , Zhao, K. , and Lu, B. , 2003, “ Fault Monitoring of Nuclear Power Plant Sensors and Field Devices,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 43(1–4), pp. 337–342. [CrossRef]
Peuget, R. , Courtine, S. , and Rognon, J. , 1998, “ Fault Detection and Isolation on a PWM Inverter by Knowledge-Based Model,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 34(6), pp. 1318–1326. [CrossRef]
Hwang, I. , Kim, S. , Kim, Y. , and Seah, C. E. , 2010, “ A Survey of Fault Detection, Isolation, and Reconfiguration Methods,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 18(3), pp. 636–653. [CrossRef]
Frank, P. M. , 1990, “ Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems Using Analytical Knowledge-Based Redundancy—A Survey and Some New Results,” Automatica, 26(3), pp. 459–474. [CrossRef]
Gao, Z. , Cecati, C. , and Ding, S. X. , 2015, “ A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques—Part I: Fault Diagnosis,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 62(6), pp. 3768–3774.
Ray, A. , and Desai, M. , 1986, “ A Redundancy Management Procedure for Fault Detection and Isolation,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 108(3), pp. 248–254. [CrossRef]
Shim, D. S. , and Yang, C. K. , 2010, “ Optimal Configuration of Redundant Inertial Sensors for Navigation and FDI Performance,” Sensors, 10(7), pp. 6497–6512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gertler, J. J. , 1991, “ Analytical Redundancy Methods in Fault Detection and Isolation-Survey and Synthesis,” IFAC Proc. 24(6), pp. 9–21. [CrossRef]
Chow, E. Y. , and Willsky, A. S. , 1984, “ Analytical Redundancy and the Design of Robust Failure-Detection Systems,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 29(7), pp. 603–614. [CrossRef]
Patton, R. J. , and Chen, J. , 1997, “ Observer-Based Fault Detection and Isolation: Robustness and Applications,” Control Eng. Pract., 5(5), pp. 671–682. [CrossRef]
Frank, P. M. , and Ding, X. , 1997, “ Survey of Robust Residual Generation and Evaluation Methods in Observer-Based Fault Detection Systems,” J. Proc. Control, 7(6), pp. 403–424. [CrossRef]
Mondal, S. , Chakraborty, G. , and Bhattacharyya, K. , 2008, “ Robust Unknown Input Observer for Nonlinear Systems and Its Application to Fault Detection and Isolation,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 130(4), p. 044503. [CrossRef]
Liu, C.-S. , and Peng, H. , 2002, “ Inverse-Dynamics Based State and Disturbance Observers for Linear Time-Invariant Systems,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 124(3), pp. 375–381. [CrossRef]
Chen, W. , and Saif, M. , 2007, “ Observer-Based Fault Diagnosis of Satellite Systems Subject to Time-Varying Thruster Faults,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 129(3), p. 352. [CrossRef]
Chen, J. , Patton, R. J. , and Zhang, H. Y. , 1996, “ Design of Unknown Input Observers and Robust Fault Detection Filters,” Int. J. Control, 63(1), pp. 85–105. [CrossRef]
Koeln, J. P. , Williams, M. A. , Pangborn, H. C. , and Alleyne, A. G. , 2016, “ Experimental Validation of Graph-Based Modeling for Thermal Fluid Power Flow Systems,” ASME Paper No. DSCC2016-9782.
Pangborn, H. C. , Koeln, J. P. , Williams, M. A. , and Alleyne, A. G. , 2018, “ Experimental Validation of Graph-Based Hierarchical Control for Thermal Management,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 140(10), p. 101016. [CrossRef]
Moore, B. , 1981, “ Principal Component Analysis in Linear Systems: Controllability, Observability, and Model Reduction,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 26(1), pp. 17–32. [CrossRef]
Glover, K. , 1984, “ All Optimal Hankel-Norm Approximations of Linear Multivariable Systems and Their L, ∞ -Error Bounds,” Int. J. Control, 39(6), pp. 1115–1193. [CrossRef]
Schilders, W. , 2008, Introduction to Model Order Reduction, Springer, Berlin.
Deng, K. , Barooah, P. , Mehta, P. G. , and Meyn, S. P. , 2010, “ Building Thermal Model Reduction Via Aggregation of States,” American Control Conference (ACC), Baltimore, MD, June 30–July 2, pp. 5118–5123.
Deng, K. , Goyal, S. , Barooah, P. , and Mehta, P. G. , 2014, “ Structure-Preserving Model Reduction of Nonlinear Building Thermal Models,” Automatica, 50(4), pp. 1188–1195. [CrossRef]
Chen, J. , 2014, Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems, Vol. 1, Springer, New York.
Corless, M. , and Tu, J. , 1998, “ State and Input Estimation for a Class of Uncertain Systems,” Automatica, 34(6), pp. 757–764. [CrossRef]
Darouach, M. , Zasadzinski, M. , and Xu, S. J. J. , 1994, “ Full-Order Observers for Linear Systems With Unknown Inputs,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 39(3), pp. 606–609. [CrossRef]
Guan, Y. , and Saif, M. , 1991, “ A Novel Approach to the Design of Unknown Input Observers,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 36(5), pp. 632–635. [CrossRef]
Hou, M. , and Muller, P. C. , 1992, “ Design of Observers for Linear Systems With Unknown Inputs,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 37(6), pp. 871–875. [CrossRef]
Hudson, W. A. , and Levin, M. L. , 1998, “ Integrated Aircraft Fuel Thermal Thermal Management System,” U.S. Patent No. 4776536.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

An example graph-based model representing mass flow dynamics of an aircraft fluid thermal management system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Testbed representing an example aircraft FTMS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of the testbed shown in Fig. 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Full-order graph-based model of the mass flow dynamics of the FTMS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Reduced-order (left) versus full order (right) graph-based models of the mass flow dynamics of the FTMS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Pressure dynamics of the graph-based model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

FDI—scenario 1 (Nonfaulty case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

FDI—scenario 2 (faulty case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

FDI—scenario 3 (faulty case)

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In